journal article·2024-01-23

MRI Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis through Molecular Targeting of C–C Chemokine Receptor Type 2 and Monocyte Hitchhiking

Noah Trac, Zixi Chen, Hyun-seok Oh, Leila Jones, Yi Huang, Joshua Giblin, Mitchell Gross, Naomi S. Sta Maria, Russell E. Jacobs, Eun Ji Chung

ACS Nano· Volume 18· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Biopsy is the clinical standard for diagnosing lymph node (LN) metastasis, but it is invasive and poses significant risk to patient health. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been utilized as a noninvasive alternative but is limited by low sensitivity, with only ∼35% of LN metastases detected, as clinical contrast agents cannot discriminate between healthy and metastatic LNs due to nonspecific accumulation. Nanoparticles targeted to the C–C chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2), a biomarker highly expressed in metastatic LNs, have the potential to guide the delivery of contrast agents, improving the sensitivity of MRI. Additionally, cancer cells in metastatic LNs produce monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP1), which binds to CCR2 + inflammatory monocytes and stimulates their migration. Thus, the molecular targeting of CCR2 may enable nanoparticle hitchhiking onto monocytes, providing an additional mechanism for metastatic LN targeting and early detection. Hence, we developed micelles incorporating gadolinium (Gd) and peptides derived from the CCR2-binding motif of MCP1 (MCP1-Gd) and evaluated the potential of MCP1-Gd to detect LN metastasis. When incubated with migrating monocytes in vitro, MCP1-Gd transport across lymphatic endothelium increased 2-fold relative to nontargeting controls. After administration into mouse models with initial LN metastasis and recurrent LN metastasis, MCP1-Gd detected metastatic LNs by increasing MRI signal by 30–50% relative to healthy LNs. Furthermore, LN targeting was dependent on monocyte hitchhiking, as monocyte depletion decreased accumulation by >70%. Herein, we present a nanoparticle contrast agent for MRI detection of LN metastasis mediated by CCR2-targeting and demonstrate the potential of monocyte hitchhiking for enhanced nanoparticle delivery.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Chemokine receptors and signaling · Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics · Immunotherapy and Immune Responses

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, United States

Lawrence J. Ellison Institute for Transformative Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90064, United States

Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033, United States

Department of Physiology and Neuroscience, Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute and Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033, United States

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, United States

Department of Medicine, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, United States

Department of Medicine, Eli and Edythe Broad Center for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, United States

Funding

Alfred E. Mann Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California · Women in Science and Engineering, University of Southern California · University of Southern California · National Institutes of Health · Ming Hsieh Institute

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3322/caac.2166010.3322/caac.21660 ↗
2. 10.3390/pharmaceutics1502056510.3390/pharmaceutics15020565 ↗
3. 10.3389/fonc.2022.102105710.3389/fonc.2022.1021057 ↗
4. 10.2147/PROM.S6935110.2147/PROM.S69351 ↗
5. 10.1002/jso.2474310.1002/jso.24743 ↗
6. 10.1001/archsurg.140.1.8510.1001/archsurg.140.1.85 ↗
7. 10.1089/lrb.2020.009310.1089/lrb.2020.0093 ↗
8. 10.1093/jnci/djq45510.1093/jnci/djq455 ↗
9. 10.1259/bjr.2014054710.1259/bjr.20140547 ↗
10. 10.1097/SLA.000000000000340510.1097/SLA.0000000000003405 ↗
11. 10.1056/NEJMoa02274910.1056/NEJMoa022749 ↗
12. 10.2214/AJR.14.1413810.2214/AJR.14.14138 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.09.01910.1016/j.eururo.2011.09.019 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.crad.2007.05.02210.1016/j.crad.2007.05.022 ↗
15. 10.3389/fnmol.2018.0033510.3389/fnmol.2018.00335 ↗
16. 10.1007/s12274-018-2100-210.1007/s12274-018-2100-2 ↗
17. 10.1002/adtp.20190019610.1002/adtp.201900196 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.addr.2015.09.01210.1016/j.addr.2015.09.012 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.10.06410.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.10.064 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.joms.2016.09.05210.1016/j.joms.2016.09.052 ↗
21. 10.3390/ijms2216853010.3390/ijms22168530 ↗
22. 10.1089/jir.2008.002710.1089/jir.2008.0027 ↗
23. 10.1186/s12964-020-00589-810.1186/s12964-020-00589-8 ↗
24. 10.1002/adtp.20220004210.1002/adtp.202200042 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsnano.3c0142810.1021/acsnano.3c01428 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b0060010.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00600 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.coche.2014.11.00310.1016/j.coche.2014.11.003 ↗
28. 10.1007/s13346-021-01015-310.1007/s13346-021-01015-3 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41578-019-0110-710.1038/s41578-019-0110-7 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b0118210.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b01182 ↗
31. 10.1038/srep1166410.1038/srep11664 ↗
32. 10.3791/5662510.3791/56625 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsomega.6b0021010.1021/acsomega.6b00210 ↗
34. 10.1097/01.rli.0000184756.66360.d310.1097/01.rli.0000184756.66360.d3 ↗
35. 10.1038/cr.2015.910.1038/cr.2015.9 ↗
36. 10.2147/IJN.S7301710.2147/IJN.S73017 ↗
37. 10.18632/oncotarget.1683710.18632/oncotarget.16837 ↗
38. 10.1007/s12645-012-0029-910.1007/s12645-012-0029-9 ↗
39. 10.18632/oncotarget.737610.18632/oncotarget.7376 ↗
40. 10.1111/cpr.1311510.1111/cpr.13115 ↗
41. 10.1002/jcb.2122010.1002/jcb.21220 ↗
42. 10.2214/AJR.05.026310.2214/AJR.05.0263 ↗
43. 10.1007/s00330-008-1187-310.1007/s00330-008-1187-3 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jim.2013.06.01310.1016/j.jim.2013.06.013 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.05.00210.1016/j.ctro.2019.05.002 ↗
46. 10.1097/CMR.0b013e32833716f910.1097/CMR.0b013e32833716f9 ↗
47. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.044010.1001/jamadermatol.2019.0440 ↗
48. 10.1002/jso.293054010710.1002/jso.2930540107 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.08.00710.1016/j.immuni.2013.08.007 ↗
50. 10.1097/MOL.0b013e32830d5f0910.1097/MOL.0b013e32830d5f09 ↗
51. 10.3389/fimmu.2016.0032210.3389/fimmu.2016.00322 ↗
52. 10.1084/jem.194.9.137510.1084/jem.194.9.1375 ↗
53. 10.1002/adhm.20150099810.1002/adhm.201500998 ↗
54. 10.1021/jacs.9b1104610.1021/jacs.9b11046 ↗
55. Trotter S. C. · J. Clin Aesthet Dermatol · 2013 · 6 · 18
56. 10.1021/acsnano.2c1219310.1021/acsnano.2c12193 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.01.02110.1016/j.jconrel.2023.01.021 ↗
58. 10.1021/acsnano.1c0592210.1021/acsnano.1c05922 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.12.03310.1016/j.jconrel.2021.12.033 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.12023410.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120234 ↗
61. 10.3390/jcm1002027110.3390/jcm10020271 ↗
62. 10.1002/btm2.1017310.1002/btm2.10173 ↗
63. 10.35772/ghm.2020.0102210.35772/ghm.2020.01022 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.02210.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.022 ↗
65. 10.2147/IJN.S9196110.2147/IJN.S91961 ↗
66. 10.1038/s41598-017-01575-w10.1038/s41598-017-01575-w ↗
67. 10.1016/j.intimp.2012.11.01610.1016/j.intimp.2012.11.016 ↗