Dynamic mechanical analysis, surface chemistry and morphology of alkali and enzymatic retted kenaf fibers
Source abstract
Abstract
Bast fibers grow in the bark layer of many plants and have been used for textiles and cordage for over 6000 years. Bast fibers are expanding into new markets of non-woven fabrics and composite materials, and a comparative assessment of surface reactive groups and mechanical properties after different retting procedures is of value. Here, bast fiber of kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus L., Malvaceae) were prepared by (1) alkali retting with 2% NaOH and (2) enzymatic retting with pectinase, and compared with commercially-available fiber retted by the natural microbe population in ocean water. Fiber structure was analyzed by fluorescence and electron microscopy; fiber chemistry was assessed by Raman and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and by carbohydrate analysis; and mechanical properties were determined by dynamic mechanical analysis. Collectively, these show that enzymatic and microbial retting preserve the natural fiber structure and result in superior mechanical properties compared with alkali retting, which disrupts structure and degrades quality. The impacts of the retting procedure on fiber chemistry, morphology and mechanical properties are discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of North Texas, USA
USDA Sugarcane Research Unit, USA
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Grove CS, Casey RS and Vodonik JL. Fibers. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry 1959; 51(9): 1172-1175.10.1021/ie51397a023 ↗
2. Taylor CS and Kugler DE. Kenaf: annual fiber crop products generate a growing response from industry: new crops, new uses, new markets. In: Yearbook of Agriculture . Office of Publishing and Visual Communication, USDA, Washington, DC, 1992, pp.92-98.
3. Webber CL · 2002 · 348
4. Webber CLI · 2002 · 327
5. Francois LE, Donovun DS and Moss EV. Yields, vegetative growth and fibre length of kenaf grown in saline soils. Agron J 1992; 84(4): 592-598.10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400040010x ↗
6. 10.4029/2011jemrest7no00210.4029/2011jemrest7no002 ↗
7. Mohta DC · Tappi J · 2004 · 3 · 9
8. Bel-Berger P · J Cotton Sci · 1999 · 3 · 60
9. Choi H-M · J Environ Sci Health Part A Environ Sci Eng Toxic Hazard Subst Control · 1996 · 31 · 1441
10. Goforth CE. The evaluation of kenaf as an oil sorbent. In: Goforth CE and Fuller MJ (eds) A summary of kenaf production and product development research . Mississippi State University Bulletin, vol. 1011, 1994, p. 25.
11. 10.2115/fiber.55.12_57610.2115/fiber.55.12_576 ↗
12. 10.1177/004051750606339310.1177/0040517506063393 ↗
13. Sellers T · For Prod J · 1993 · 43 · 69
14. Goda K · 2009 · 329
15. 10.1201/978020350820610.1201/9780203508206 ↗
16. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, and the International Jute Organization, Improved Retting and Extraction of Jute: Project Findings and Recommendations (1998), (cited AG:GCP/RAS/122/IJO), Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/field/381307.htm.
17. 10.1177/00405175020720070910.1177/004051750207200709 ↗
18. 10.1177/004051750607052010.1177/0040517506070520 ↗
19. Vidhate S, Stevens KJ, Ayre B, et al. Biocomposites of Sesbania herbaceae plant fibers/polyvinyl alcohol (PVA): effect of chemical retting. In: SPE annual technical conference ANTEC , 2011.
20. D’Souza NA · 2011 · 75
21. 10.1177/004051750810018510.1177/0040517508100185 ↗
22. Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, et al. Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass . Laboratory Analytical Procedure Report NREL/TP-510-42618. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), USA Department of Energy, 2012.
23. 10.1177/00405175940640050710.1177/004051759406400507 ↗
24. Rasband WS. ImageJ. 1.45s ed. 2011.
25. Carpita N · 2000 · 52
26. Williams T, Hosur M, Theodore M, et al. Time effects on morphology and bonding ability in mercerized natural fibers for composite reinforcement. Int J Polym Sci 2011; 2011.10.1155/2011/192865 ↗
27. Agarwal UP · 1999 · 201
28. 10.1366/000370297193931610.1366/0003702971939316 ↗
29. 10.1007/s12221-010-0782-510.1007/s12221-010-0782-5 ↗
30. 10.1007/s10295-013-1242-110.1007/s10295-013-1242-1 ↗