Swinging Crystal Edge of Growing Carbon Nanotubes
Source abstract
Abstract
Recent direct measurements of the growth kinetics of individual carbon nanotubes revealed abrupt changes in the growth rate of nanotubes maintaining the same crystal structure. These stochastic switches call into question the possibility of chirality selection based on growth kinetics. Here, we show that a similar average ratio between fast and slow rates of around 1.7 is observed largely independent of the catalyst and growth conditions. A simple model, supported by computer simulations, shows that these switches are caused by tilts of the growing nanotube edge between two main orientations, close-armchair or close-zigzag, inducing different growth mechanisms. The rate ratio of around 1.7 then simply results from an averaging of the number of growth sites and edge configurations in each orientation. Beyond providing insights on nanotube growth based on classical crystal growth theory, these results point to ways to control the dynamics of nanotube edges, a key requirement for stabilizing growth kinetics and producing arrays of long, structurally selected nanotubes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, CINaM, UMR7325,13288, Marseille, France
Interfaces, Confinement, Matériaux et Nanostructures, ICMN, Université d’Orléans, CNRS, 45071, Orléans, France
Laboratoire Charles Coulomb, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, 34095, Montpellier, France
Funding
Agence Nationale de la Recherche · Air Force Office of Scientific Research · Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · Institut Universitaire de France
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.aay522010.1126/science.aay5220 ↗
2. 10.1007/s00339005088610.1007/s003390050886 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0651110.1021/acsnano.8b06511 ↗
4. Pimpinelli A. · 199810.1017/CBO9780511622526 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.02.04610.1016/j.carbon.2013.02.046 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.aat622810.1126/science.aat6228 ↗
7. 10.1073/pnas.081194610610.1073/pnas.0811946106 ↗
8. 10.1021/nl901380u10.1021/nl901380u ↗
9. 10.1038/nmat323110.1038/nmat3231 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c0343110.1021/acs.nanolett.1c03431 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.09.03110.1016/j.carbon.2019.09.031 ↗
12. 10.1007/s00339005099910.1007/s003390050999 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.119059610.1126/science.1190596 ↗
14. 10.1126/science.124462310.1126/science.1244623 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.05550110.1103/PhysRevLett.113.055501 ↗
16. 10.1126/sciadv.150172910.1126/sciadv.1501729 ↗
17. 10.1021/jacs.5b0440310.1021/jacs.5b04403 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsnano.1c1056910.1021/acsnano.1c10569 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.07740210.1103/PhysRevLett.95.077402 ↗
20. 10.1073/pnas.131280211010.1073/pnas.1312802110 ↗
21. 10.1038/ncomms900610.1038/ncomms9006 ↗
22. 10.1063/5.003094310.1063/5.0030943 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.08542110.1103/PhysRevB.82.085421 ↗
24. Voter A. F. · 2007
25. 10.1021/nl072431m10.1021/nl072431m ↗
26. Hedman, D. Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes A theoretical study of stability, growth and properties; Doctoral Thesis; Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, 2019.
27. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0206110.1021/acsnano.9b02061 ↗
28. 10.1039/C7NR09539B10.1039/C7NR09539B ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.25610110.1103/PhysRevLett.123.256101 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.16610110.1103/PhysRevLett.121.166101 ↗
31. 10.1021/jacs.1c0759810.1021/jacs.1c07598 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41929-018-0057-x10.1038/s41929-018-0057-x ↗
33. 10.1038/nature1343410.1038/nature13434 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.09.01010.1016/j.carbon.2015.09.010 ↗
35. 10.1126/sciadv.abb601010.1126/sciadv.abb6010 ↗