The effect of fiber type, yarn structure and fabric structure on the frictional characteristics of sock fabrics
Source abstract
Abstract
The objective of this study was to measure the combined effects of fiber type (fine wool, mid-micron wool, acrylic), yarn type (high twist, low twist, single) and fabric structure (single jersey, half-terry, terry) on friction between sock fabrics and a synthetic skin using the horizontal platform method. The effect of weight of a hypothetical wearer and moisture content of a sock fabric were also investigated. Differences among fabrics were analyzed using frictional force traces. Data compared included the static and dynamic friction and coefficients of friction, as well as three new descriptive parameters. All variables investigated affected the frictional characteristics between a sock fabric and a synthetic skin. Single jersey fabrics had the lowest coefficient of static and dynamic friction. Friction between fabric and a synthetic skin was affected most by the applied weight, with the simulated adult weight resulting in a greater frictional force, and higher coefficients of static and dynamic friction. The most important effect of fiber was on the static frictional force and coefficient of static friction of damp fabrics, with fabrics composed of fine wool exhibiting lowest friction, and acrylic fabrics the highest.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Tribology and Wear Analysis · Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
AgResearch, Christchurch, New Zealand
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/jid.1966.16910.1038/jid.1966.169 ↗
2. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1971.tb14194.x10.1111/j.1365-2133.1971.tb14194.x ↗
3. 10.1080/1556952050053660010.1080/15569520500536600 ↗
4. 10.7547/87507315-80-2-6310.7547/87507315-80-2-63 ↗
5. Euler RD · Knitting Times · 1985 · 47
6. 10.1177/004051751036940910.1177/0040517510369409 ↗
7. 10.1177/00405175940640120410.1177/004051759406401204 ↗
8. 10.1080/0040500030863061110.1080/00405000308630611 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.wear.2010.01.01010.1016/j.wear.2010.01.010 ↗
10. 10.1177/004051751246169810.1177/0040517512461698 ↗
11. 10.1177/00405175860560090910.1177/004051758605600909 ↗
12. 10.7547/87507315-83-9-51510.7547/87507315-83-9-515 ↗
13. 10.1177/00405175880580030210.1177/004051758805800302 ↗
14. 10.1177/00405175850550020710.1177/004051758505500207 ↗
15. 10.1002/app.2021310.1002/app.20213 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00440-X10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00440-X ↗
17. 10.1177/00405175910610090710.1177/004051759106100907 ↗
18. Morton WE, Hearle JWS. Fibre friction. In: Physical Properties of Textile Fibres . 3rd edition. Manchester, UK: The Textile Institute 1993, p.635.
19. Ramkumar SS · AATCC Review · 2005 · 5 · 17
20. 10.1177/00405175920620010810.1177/004051759206200108 ↗
21. ISO 6330:2000. Textiles—Domestic washing and drying procedures for textile testing. Geneva, ISO.
22. 10.1177/004051750606339110.1177/0040517506063391 ↗
23. ISO 139:2005. Textiles—Standard atmospheres for conditioning and testing. Geneva, ISO.
24. 10.1080/0040500080254224210.1080/00405000802542242 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.wear.2006.11.03110.1016/j.wear.2006.11.031 ↗
26. 10.1177/004051750707823210.1177/0040517507078232 ↗
27. 10.1177/00405175530230080910.1177/004051755302300809 ↗
28. Scheiner SM · 200110.1093/oso/9780195131871.001.0001 ↗
29. Gupta BS · 2008 · 177
30. 10.1080/1944701610868850910.1080/19447016108688509 ↗
31. Sanders JE · J Rehab Res Dev · 1998 · 35 · 161
32. Myshkin NK · Tribol Int · 2006 · 38 · 910
33. Morton WE, Hearle JWS. Tensile properties. In: Physical Properties of Textiles Fibres . 3rd edition. Manchester, UK: The Textile Institute, 1993: 406.
34. 10.1080/0040500730863025510.1080/00405007308630255 ↗
35. 10.1021/la950896z10.1021/la950896z ↗
36. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.10.00210.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.10.002 ↗