Breeding Cottons with Higher Yarn Tenacity
Source abstract
Abstract
Stronger cotton yams are needed by the textile industry as knit and woven fabric manufacturing speeds increase, thus placing greater strain on cotton yarns. We compare fiber properties as selection criteria for the genetic improvement of yarn tenacity in a breeding population consisting of twenty-five cotton germplasm lines grown for two years at two locations near Florence, SC. Fiber properties measured with the fibrograph, Stelometer, fibronaire, and Arealometer are obtained on lint from each experimental line in this population, along with ring spun yam with a tenacity of 27 tex (22 Ne). Among individual fiber properties, selection for 50% fiber span length results in the greatest gain in yarn tenacity. Simultaneous selection for low Micronaire reading, long 50% fiber span length, and high fiber tenacity improve yam tenacity more so than selection for individual fiber properties. Selecting for fiber properties measured with the Arealometer generally results in lower gains in yarn tenacity. We show individual and combinations of fiber properties that are useful as selection criteria for yarn tenacity improvement.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Research in Cotton Cultivation · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
USDA, ARS, Department of Agronomy, Clemson University, Florence, South Carolina 29506, U.S.A.
USDA, ARS, Cotton Quality Research Station, Clemson South Carolina 29634, U.S.A.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Backe, E.E.
2. Becker, W.A. , Prediction of Correlated Responses, i "Manual of Quantitative Genetics," 5th ed. Academi Enterprises, Pullman, WA, 1992, pp. 27-28.
3. 10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600030008x10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600030008x ↗
4. Culp, T.W., and Harrell, D.C., Breeding Quality Cotto at the Pee Dee Experiment Station, Florence, SC, USDA Publ. ARS S-30, U.S. Gov. Print. Office. Washingtor D.C., 1974, pp. 1-12.
5. Culp, T.W. · Stn. Tech. Bull. · 1985 · 1090 · 1
6. Deussen, H., Improved Cotton Fiber Properties—Th Textile Industry's Key to Success in Global Competitior in "Cotton Fiber Cellulose: Structure, Function, and Uti lization Conf." National Cotton Council, Cotton Inc USDA, ARS, Savannah, GA, 1992 , pp. 43-63.
7. 10.1177/00405175740440040410.1177/004051757404400404 ↗
8. 10.2307/252757310.2307/2527573 ↗
9. Faerber, C., Future Demands on Cotton Fiber Quality in the Textile Industry: Technology—Quality—Cost . in "Proc. Beltwide Cotton Production Research Confer ence ," National Cotton Council, San Antonio, TX, 1995 pp. 1449-1454.
10. 10.1177/00405175510210110110.1177/004051755102101101 ↗
11. 10.1177/00405175620320080810.1177/004051756203200808 ↗
12. 10.1177/00405175590290090510.1177/004051755902900905 ↗
13. 10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400030016x10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400030016x ↗
14. Meredith, W.R. · 1984
15. 10.1177/00405175910610120310.1177/004051759106101203 ↗
16. Meredith, W.R. Jr. Sasser, P.E., and Rayburn, S.T., Regional High Quality Fiber Properties as Measured by Conventional and AFIS Methods, in "Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conference," National Cotton Council. Nashville, TN , 1996, pp. 1681-1684.
17. Relationship of Fiber Strength to Yarn Strength, Textile Top. 15 (12)(1987).
18. 10.1177/00405175770470100810.1177/004051757704701008 ↗
19. Taylor, R.A.