Superhydrophobic and superoleophilic cotton fabric membrane with recycled ZnO for oil–water separation: particle size effect micrometric versus nanometric
Source abstract
Abstract
This study demonstrates the synthesis of superhydrophobic and hydrophobic cotton fabric membranes, used for separating oil–water emulsions, by a simple immersion method with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and zinc oxide (ZnO) from waste alkaline batteries. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis confirmed the effectiveness of ZnO/PDMS treatment, which increased the surface roughness and enhanced water contact angles (WCAs). The membranes treated with PDMS (5 g PDMS prepolymer, 0.5 g curing agent, 45 mL isopropyl alcohol) exhibited a WCA of 145 ± 1°, whereas those treated with PDMS and 1 g of ZnO (micro or nano) achieved WCAs of 145 ± 1° and 153 ± 1°, respectively. This difference is attributed to the low surface tension of the PDMS layer on the cotton fabric, combined with the surface roughness topography created by the ZnO micro- and nanostructures. Filtration tests showed that the membranes treated with only PDMS achieved >96% oil filtration and 94% water blockage, whereas ZnO/PDMS membranes maintained similar oil filtration efficiency but achieved 100% water blockage. These results highlight the potential of recycled ZnO in cotton fabric membranes for oil–water separation, with micro-ZnO offering a cost-effective and sustainable solution and nano-ZnO providing superhydrophobic behavior, both contributing to improved membrane performance in wastewater treatment applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Solar-Powered Water Purification Methods · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Instituto de Ingeniería y Tecnología, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Cd. Juárez, Chihuahua, México
Funding
Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.11552610.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115526 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.desal.2014.11.02310.1016/j.desal.2014.11.023 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jece.2022.10725710.1016/j.jece.2022.107257 ↗
4. 10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60408-010.1016/S1672-6529(16)60408-0 ↗
5. Wang B et al. Methodology for robust superhydrophobic fabrics and sponges from in situ growth of transition metal/metal oxide nanocrystals with thiol modification and their applications in oil/water separation. ACS Appl Mater Interf 2013; 5(5): 1827–1839. doi: 10.1021/am303176a.10.1021/am303176a ↗
6. Kumar S Sahare PD Kumar S. Optimization of the CVD parameters for ZnO nanorods growth: its photoluminescence and field emission properties. Mater Res Bull 2018; 105: 237–245. doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.05.002.10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.05.002 ↗
7. 10.1039/C4RA04904G10.1039/C4RA04904G ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.05.68010.1016/j.matpr.2023.05.680 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.03.16010.1016/j.apsusc.2008.03.160 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cej.2013.06.00410.1016/j.cej.2013.06.004 ↗
11. 10.2147/IJN.S1826710.2147/IJN.S18267 ↗
12. León CL, et al. Synthesis by sol-gel and cytotoxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles using wasted alkaline batteries. Digest J Nanomater Biostruct 2017; 12: 371.
13. Tovar E. Preparacion y caracterizacion de peliculas delgadas de ZnO para su uso en estructuras vidrio/ITO/ZnO/CdS. 2013.
14. 10.1016/j.cplett.2019.13705110.1016/j.cplett.2019.137051 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.12477610.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.124776 ↗
16. 10.1002/adfm.20110109010.1002/adfm.201101090 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b0025410.1021/acs.iecr.8b00254 ↗
18. 10.1039/C5TA01014D10.1039/C5TA01014D ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jece.2021.10608310.1016/j.jece.2021.106083 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.11389610.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113896 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.nantod.2017.10.01210.1016/j.nantod.2017.10.012 ↗
22. 10.1088/1468-6996/9/3/03500110.1088/1468-6996/9/3/035001 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.01.10510.1016/j.matlet.2014.01.105 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c0232510.1021/acs.langmuir.3c02325 ↗
25. 10.3390/coatings1103032610.3390/coatings11030326 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.09.04110.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.09.041 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.12729010.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.127290 ↗
28. 10.3390/ijms2514767510.3390/ijms25147675 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.08.11810.1016/j.carbpol.2012.08.118 ↗
30. 10.1002/jctb.274610.1002/jctb.2746 ↗
31. 10.1039/c1cp20671k10.1039/c1cp20671k ↗
32. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.07.23610.1016/j.matpr.2022.07.236 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.12157810.1016/j.seppur.2022.121578 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10570-020-03261-z10.1007/s10570-020-03261-z ↗
35. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.12846210.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.128462 ↗
36. 10.1016/0927-7757(93)80252-A10.1016/0927-7757(93)80252-A ↗
37. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.14928610.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149286 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0515710.1021/acsnano.9b05157 ↗
39. 10.1007/s10570-021-04408-210.1007/s10570-021-04408-2 ↗
40. 10.1088/0957-4484/21/32/32560310.1088/0957-4484/21/32/325603 ↗
41. 10.1007/s10570-019-02891-210.1007/s10570-019-02891-2 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.05.01210.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.05.012 ↗
43. 10.1002/masy.20180024710.1002/masy.201800247 ↗
44. Jeronimo K Koutsos V Cheung R Mastropaolo E. PDMS-ZnO piezoelectric nanocomposites for pressure sensors. Sensors. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/17/587310.3390/s21175873 ↗
45. Miranda Olmedo NA. Efecto de las nanopartículas en la inyección de agua con baja salinidad como un método novedoso de recuperación mejorada: Alteración de la humectabilidad 2017. Available at: https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/63464
46. 10.1007/s10570-024-05819-710.1007/s10570-024-05819-7 ↗