Investigating the effect of body shape on denim clothing fit
Source abstract
Abstract
Denim products have original visual effects that are integrated with their sewing features. This initial aesthetic appearance risks deterioration if seams are modified because clothing does not fit. Clothing fit problems caused by variations in body shape are sensitive issues that need to be explicitly examined for denim products. In this work, to investigate the effects of body shape on denim clothing fit, denim overalls were chosen, as they cover three primary areas (chest, waist, hips) which are mainly used to define body shapes. For this purpose, overalls were designed in size 40 using 3D fashion design software. In the first part of the study, the size-40 avatar in the program was dressed in denim overalls using four different constructions of denim fabric. Clothing fit for the standard body shape for each fabric was evaluated using tension and pressure maps. Fabric 2, having an average value in terms of weight, thickness, bend, and stretch among the fabrics, was chosen for the second part of the study to examine the effect of body shape on clothing fit. Subsequently, five avatars with different body shapes were designed. Then, for the five different body shapes, avatars were dressed in overalls in the chosen denim fabric. Clothing fit values were evaluated using software tension and pressure maps and found to be within acceptable limits, which is considered ideal. The fit evaluation indicated that varying body shapes with extra width or narrowness of the chest, waist, and hip lines affected the clothing fit.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis · Human Motion and Animation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Technology, Department of Textile Engineering, Marmara University, Turkey
Denizli Vocational School of Technical Sciences—Fashion Design Department, Pamukkale University, Turkey
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00006-X10.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00006-X ↗
2. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00002-210.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00002-2 ↗
3. Textile Institute. Denim. Textiles Terms and Definitions. https://www.textileinstitute.org/?s=denim&site_section=search (2024 accessed 05 May 2023).
4. 10.1080/15440478.2022.202979310.1080/15440478.2022.2029793 ↗
5. 10.1016/B978-0-85709-843-6.00007-X10.1016/B978-0-85709-843-6.00007-X ↗
6. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00010-110.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00010-1 ↗
7. Özdil N. Stretch and bagging properties of denim fabrics containing different rates of elastane. Fibres Text East Eur 2008; 16: 63–66.
8. 10.1533/9781782422150.1.310.1533/9781782422150.1.3 ↗
9. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00001-010.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00001-0 ↗
10. 10.1186/s40691-018-0140-610.1186/s40691-018-0140-6 ↗
11. Rahman O. Understanding consumers’ perceptions and buying behaviours: Implications for denim jeans design. J Text Apparel, Technol Manage 2011; 7: 1–16.
12. Tama D, Öndoğan Z. Fitting evaluation of pattern making systems according to female body shapes. Fibres Text East Eur 2014; 4: 107–111.
13. 10.1108/0955622071081955510.1108/09556220710819555 ↗
14. Devarajan P, Istook CL. Validation of female figure identification technique (FFIT) for apparel software. J Text Apparel, Technol Manage 2004; 4: 1–23.
15. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102604-5.00005-610.1016/B978-0-08-102604-5.00005-6 ↗
16. Hidayati SC Hsu C-C Chang Y-T et al. What dress fits me best? Fashion recommendation on the clothing style for personal body shape. In: MM ’18: Proceedings of the 26th ACM international conference on multimedia Seoul Republic of Korea 22–26 October 2018 pp. 438–446. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/3240508.3240546 ↗
17. 10.1177/0887302X1246205810.1177/0887302X12462058 ↗
18. Simmons KP, Istook CL, , andDevarajan P. Female figure identification technique (FFIT) for apparel. Part I: Describing female shapes. J Text Apparel, Technol Manage 2004; 4: 1–15.
19. 10.4156/jdcta.vol4.issue7.610.4156/jdcta.vol4.issue7.6 ↗
20. 10.1108/0955622981023932410.1108/09556229810239324 ↗
21. Faust ME, Carrier S. Women’s wear sizing: A new labelling system. J Fash Mark Manage 2010; 14: 88–126.
22. 10.1108/IJCST-07-2014-008110.1108/IJCST-07-2014-0081 ↗
23. 10.1108/0955622021042034510.1108/09556220210420345 ↗
24. Simmons KKP. Body shape analysis using three-dimensional body scanning technology. PhD Thesis North Carolina State University USA 2002.
25. Simmons K., Istook CL, , andDevarajan P. Female figure identification technique (FFIT) for apparel. Part II: Development of shape sorting software. J Text Apparel, Technol Manage 2004; 4: 1–15.
26. 10.1080/17543266.2011.58908310.1080/17543266.2011.589083 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cviu.2014.06.01210.1016/j.cviu.2014.06.012 ↗
28. Hidayati SC Anistyasari Y. Body shape calculator: Understanding the type of body shapes from anthropometric measurements. In: ICMR ’21: Proceedings of the 2021 international conference on multimedia retrieval Taipei 21–24 August 2021 pp. 461–465. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/3460426.3463582 ↗
29. 10.1177/0887302X060240020310.1177/0887302X0602400203 ↗
30. 10.1108/0955622111109673210.1108/09556221111096732 ↗
31. 10.1007/978-981-99-9983-5_710.1007/978-981-99-9983-5_7 ↗
32. Sokolowski SL Bettencourt C. Modification of the female figure identification technique (FFIT) formulas to include plus size bodies. In: 3DBODY. TECH 2020: 11th international conference and exhibition on 3D body scanning and processing technologies (ed. N D’Apuzzo) Online/Virtual (Lugano Switzerland) 17–18 November 2020 paper no. 22. Ascona Switzerland: Hometrica Consulting.10.15221/20.22 ↗
33. 10.1177/004051751039244810.1177/0040517510392448 ↗
34. Anand N, Tiwari M. Comprehensive analysis of body shapes in the Indian female population: A national and regional study. In: Montagna G, Carvalho C (eds.) Human factors for apparel and textile engineering: AHFE (2024) international conference. New York: AHFE, 2024, vol. 134, pp. 63–76.
35. Zangue F Pirch C Klepser A et al. Virtual fit vs. physical fit: How well does 3D simulation represent the physical reality. In: 3DBODY. TECH 2020: 11th international conference and exhibition on 3D body scanning and processing technologies (ed. N D’Apuzzo) Online/Virtual (Lugano Switzerland) 17–18 November 2020 paper no. 21. Ascona Switzerland: Hometrica Consulting.10.15221/20.21 ↗
36. 10.1080/17543266.2016.125029010.1080/17543266.2016.1250290 ↗
37. 10.1007/978-981-13-0080-6_1410.1007/978-981-13-0080-6_14 ↗
38. 10.1108/0955622081087882910.1108/09556220810878829 ↗
39. 10.1007/s00170-022-08965-z10.1007/s00170-022-08965-z ↗
40. 10.35530/IT.074.01.202111110.35530/IT.074.01.2021111 ↗
41. 10.3390/su1507623510.3390/su15076235 ↗
42. 10.35530/IT.074.01.20229510.35530/IT.074.01.202295 ↗
43. 10.1108/RJTA-03-02-1999-B00810.1108/RJTA-03-02-1999-B008 ↗
44. 10.1108/0955622051057796110.1108/09556220510577961 ↗
45. Sattar H Pons-Moll G andFritz M. Fashion is taking shape: Understanding clothing preference based on body shape from online sources (ed. P Kellenberger). In: 2019 IEEE winter conference on applications of computer vision (WACV) Waikoloa HI USA 7–11 January 2019 pp. 968–977. Piscataway NJ: IEEE.10.1109/WACV.2019.00108 ↗
46. 10.1108/JFMM-03-2022-004910.1108/JFMM-03-2022-0049 ↗
47. 10.1108/IJCST-12-2012-008010.1108/IJCST-12-2012-0080 ↗
48. 10.1007/s10055-024-00945-w10.1007/s10055-024-00945-w ↗
49. 10.1088/1757-899X/254/15/15200110.1088/1757-899X/254/15/152001 ↗
50. Carrico M. Bat-wing denim dress. In: International textile and apparel association annual conference proceedings Las Vegas NV USA 25–29 October 2019 vol. 76. Ames IA: Iowa State University Digital Press.10.31274/itaa.8777 ↗
51. 10.51551/verimlilik.98935210.51551/verimlilik.989352 ↗
52. Aldrich W. Metric pattern cutting for women’s wear. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 2008.
53. Shoben M, Ward J. Pattern cutting and making up: The professional approach. London: Heinemann, 1987.
54. Cihangir E. Technical manual series: Dimensions in apparel industry. Istanbul: Istanbul Textile and Apparel Exporter Associations (ITKIB) Publishing, 2002.
55. Simmons KP. Body measurement techniques: A comparison of three-dimensional body scanning and physical anthropometric methods. PhD Thesis North Carolina State University USA 2001.
56. 10.1108/IJCST-12-2012-008010.1108/IJCST-12-2012-0080 ↗
57. 10.5850/JKSCT.2010.34.12.196810.5850/JKSCT.2010.34.12.1968 ↗
58. Browzwear. V-Stitcher training manual. Polytropon: Browzwear, 2018.