Effects of the moisture barrier and thermal liner components on the heat strain and thermal protective performance of firefighter turnout systems
Source abstract
Abstract
An ideal firefighter turnout system should be capable of releasing body heat to prevent heat stress, indicated by THL (total heat loss) and R ef (evaporative resistance) indexes, while maintaining high thermal protective performance (TPP). Our study found no correlations between THL and R ef , or between R ef and TPP. The results showed that, when tested in the mild condition as in the standard THL test method, turnout systems with bi-component moisture barriers exhibited an advantage in THL that did not translate to more thermally stressful hot environments. A physiological manikin was used to understand the effect of turnout clothing systems on heat strain in different environmental conditions and the value of utilizing R ef or THL to predict heat strain performance. We found no difference in heat strain performance between composites with one-layer and two-layer spunlace thermal liners in mild or hot conditions. It showed that both THL and R ef had their limitations: THL only predicted thermal burden in mild environments, while R ef was only correlated in hot conditions. Thus, the exclusive reliance on either index could increase the risk of heat stress, and we recommend incorporating the R ef heat strain index, along with THL, as dual metrics for certifying the heat strain performance of turnout suits in the NFPA 1971 standard.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermoregulation and physiological responses · Occupational Health and Performance · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Textile Protection and Comfort Center, North Carolina State University, USA
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. NFPA 1971:2018. Standard on protective ensembles for structural fire fighting and proximity fire fighting.
2. 10.1080/10803548.2021.198702410.1080/10803548.2021.1987024 ↗
3. 10.1177/0040517521102653710.1177/00405175211026537 ↗
4. 10.1177/0040517521107335310.1177/00405175211073353 ↗
5. 10.1108/RJTA-01-2019-000210.1108/RJTA-01-2019-0002 ↗
6. 10.1177/004051751038010810.1177/0040517510380108 ↗
7. 10.1177/004051751665110110.1177/0040517516651101 ↗
8. 10.1520/STP14468S10.1520/STP14468S ↗
9. 10.1520/STP14467S10.1520/STP14467S ↗
10. Gao H. · 2021
11. 10.1177/00405175000700051310.1177/004051750007000513 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0142-9418(99)00040-910.1016/S0142-9418(99)00040-9 ↗
13. 10.1039/b703447b10.1039/b703447b ↗
14. 10.1177/152808370708216410.1177/1528083707082164 ↗
15. 10.1007/s10694-010-0151-310.1007/s10694-010-0151-3 ↗
16. Song G, Mandal S, Rossi RM. Thermal protective clothing for firefighters . Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2017, pp.27–55.
17. 10.1177/0887302X1875734810.1177/0887302X18757348 ↗
18. 10.1177/154193121360185210.1177/1541931213601852 ↗
19. 10.1007/s12221-016-5360-z10.1007/s12221-016-5360-z ↗
20. 10.1007/s10694-018-0730-210.1007/s10694-018-0730-2 ↗
21. 10.1177/004051751880905510.1177/0040517518809055 ↗
22. ASTM F1868:2017. Standard test method for thermal and evaporative resistance of clothing materials using a sweating hot plate.
23. 10.1520/STP19903S10.1520/STP19903S ↗
24. Stoll AM · Aerosp Med · 1969 · 40 · 1232
25. Burke R
26. 10.1520/STP16242019007710.1520/STP162420190077 ↗
27. 10.1520/STP16242019007510.1520/STP162420190075 ↗
28. Corder GW, Foreman DI. Nonparametric statistics: a step-by-step approach. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2014, pp.139–148.
29. 10.1177/00405175000700070210.1177/004051750007000702 ↗
30. Barker RL · J Eng Fibers Fabr · 2011 · 6 · 1
31. Boguslawska-Baczek M · J Mater Sci Eng A · 2011 · 1 · 358
32. Boguslawska-Baczek M · Fibres Textil East Eur · 2013 · 1 · 67
33. 10.14502/Tekstilec2017.60.331-33810.14502/Tekstilec2017.60.331-338 ↗