journal article·2020-09

Multisensory perception and positive emotion: Exploratory study on mixed item set for apparel e-customization

Pei Li, Chunmao Wu, Charles Spence

Textile Research Journal· Volume 90· Issue 17-18
Publisher page

Abstract

With the rapid development of digital technology, many consumers increasingly prefer to buy their clothes online. In order to improve the quality of online services and enrich the consumer experience of apparel e-customization, this paper develops item scales that measure positive emotion, visual perception, and haptic perception. It also evaluates the relationships between the item scales, attitude, and intention. It is an exploratory study on consumers’ multisensory perception and positive emotion mixed item scale (MPPEMIS), collected by experts. Supported by factor analysis and correlation analysis, both laboratory and online studies were conducted to test the reliability and validity between item scales, attitude, and intention. Visual factors (e.g., transparency, brightness, dimness), haptic factors (e.g., comfort, coarseness, softness), and positive emotion (e.g., excitement, attractive, pleasantness) are proved in the MPPEMIS, which positively correlates with the factors of attitude and intention in apparel e-customization. As such, the MPPEMIS may help to assist brand managers, marketers, and retailers by recommending easily understood information and providing item scales for apparel e-customization that can also be adopted in online service strategies and system modularization.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Color perception and design · Multisensory perception and integration · Consumer Retail Behavior Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Shanghai University of Engineering Science

Donghua University

University of Oxford

References (86)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1108/0959055091095489210.1108/09590550910954892 ↗
2. 10.1177/0887302X930110020710.1177/0887302X9301100207 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.07.02110.1016/j.foodres.2017.07.021 ↗
4. 10.1002/mar.2070910.1002/mar.20709 ↗
5. 10.1108/IJCST-01-2018-001110.1108/IJCST-01-2018-0011 ↗
6. 10.1080/00405000.2019.160637710.1080/00405000.2019.1606377 ↗
7. 10.1080/0040500030863062210.1080/00405000308630622 ↗
8. Li P, Chen J, Liu Z. Consumer perception and behavioral intention in apparel e-shopping: A study on Chinese college students. J Fashion Tech Text Eng 2017; 5(1): 1–9.
9. 10.1016/j.tele.2016.02.00710.1016/j.tele.2016.02.007 ↗
10. 10.1108/OIR-11-2015-036410.1108/OIR-11-2015-0364 ↗
11. 10.1167/16.3.3410.1167/16.3.34 ↗
12. 10.1002/mar.2113010.1002/mar.21130 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jretai.2010.09.00210.1016/j.jretai.2010.09.002 ↗
14. 10.1007/978-3-642-28753-4_20133610.1007/978-3-642-28753-4_201336 ↗
15. 10.1002/mar.2039210.1002/mar.20392 ↗
16. Spence C Pavani F Maravita A et al. Multisensory contributions to the representation of peripersonal space in humans: Evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. J Physiol 2004; 98: 171–189.10.1016/j.jphysparis.2004.03.008 ↗
17. 10.1007/978-3-319-94977-2_610.1007/978-3-319-94977-2_6 ↗
18. 10.4018/978-1-60960-821-7.ch00110.4018/978-1-60960-821-7.ch001 ↗
19. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644469.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644469.001.0001 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.concog.2014.08.01110.1016/j.concog.2014.08.011 ↗
21. 10.1163/22134808-0000249710.1163/22134808-00002497 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.concog.2019.03.01210.1016/j.concog.2019.03.012 ↗
23. 10.1163/22134808-0000259710.1163/22134808-00002597 ↗
24. Glass ST, Lingg E, Heuberger E. Do ambient odors evoke basic emotions? Frontiers in Psychology 2014; 5(340): 1–11. Doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00340.
25. Spence C. A new multisensory approach to health and well-being. In Essence 2003; 2: 16–22.
26. 10.1162/pres.1992.1.3.27910.1162/pres.1992.1.3.279 ↗
27. 10.1108/1355585111116506610.1108/13555851111165066 ↗
28. 10.1007/s00221-003-1404-x10.1007/s00221-003-1404-x ↗
29. 10.1016/S0167-8760(03)00125-910.1016/S0167-8760(03)00125-9 ↗
30. 10.1038/415429a10.1038/415429a ↗
31. Ishikawa T Taira S Sasaki K et al. A method for developing images of clothes based on visual and tactile evaluations of “thickness” and “thinness”. Procedia Manufacturing 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics and the Affiliated Conference 2015 2162–2166.10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.356 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.05.03910.1016/j.matdes.2015.05.039 ↗
33. 10.1080/1944702340866163110.1080/19447023408661631 ↗
34. Binns H. Visual and tactual ‘judgement’ as illustrated in a practical experiment. Brit J Psychology 1937; 27: 404–410.
35. Bliglevens J, Creusen MEH, Schoormans JPL. How consumers perceive product appearance: The identification of three product appearance attributes. Int J Design 2009; 3(3): 27–35.
36. 10.1007/s12652-015-0307-610.1007/s12652-015-0307-6 ↗
37. Bosmans A. Scents and sensibility: When do (in)congruent ambient scents influence product evaluations? J Marketing 2006; 70(July): 32–43.
38. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.04.00110.1016/j.actpsy.2006.04.001 ↗
39. Sundar A and Noseworthy TJ. When sensory marketing works and when it backfires. Harvard Bus Rev May 19 2016. Available at: https://hbr.org/2016/05/when-sensory-marketing-works-and-when-it-backfires.
40. 10.1093/jcr/ucw00310.1093/jcr/ucw003 ↗
41. Gerdes ABM, Wieser MJ, Alpers GW. Emotional pictures and sounds: A review of multimodal interactions of emotion cues in multiple domains. Frontiers in Psychology 2014; 5(1351): 1–13. Doi: 10.3389/fpsyg. 2014.01351.
42. 10.1515/revneuro-2012-004010.1515/revneuro-2012-0040 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.02.00310.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.02.003 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jretai.2006.09.00110.1016/j.jretai.2006.09.001 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.engappai.2015.04.00110.1016/j.engappai.2015.04.001 ↗
46. Solomon MR. Consumer behavior: Buying, having and being, Global Edition. New Jersey, USA: Pearson Education, 2014.
47. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.04.00710.1016/j.jretconser.2017.04.007 ↗
48. Harmon-Jones E, Harmon-Jones C, Amodio DM, et al. Attitudes toward emotions. J Personality Soc Psych 2011; 81: 869–885.
49. 10.1108/HRMID-01-2014-001210.1108/HRMID-01-2014-0012 ↗
50. 10.1007/s12525-014-0153-y10.1007/s12525-014-0153-y ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.01010.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.010 ↗
52. 10.1108/JHOM-06-2016-010810.1108/JHOM-06-2016-0108 ↗
53. 10.1108/BFJ-08-2017-043610.1108/BFJ-08-2017-0436 ↗
54. 10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.17910.1037/0022-3514.90.1.179 ↗
55. 10.1002/mar.2076210.1002/mar.20762 ↗
56. 10.5057/ijae.14.11910.5057/ijae.14.119 ↗
57. 10.1177/004051751771209210.1177/0040517517712092 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.07.00110.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.07.001 ↗
59. Chen X, Shao F, Barnes C, et al. Exploring relationships between touch perception and surface physical properties. Int J Design 2009; 3(2): 67–76.
60. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.02.00510.1016/j.foodqual.2009.02.005 ↗
61. Spinelli S and Niedziela M. Emotion measurements and application to product and packaging development. In: Integrating the Packaging and Product Experience in Food and Beverages A Road-Map to Consumer Satisfaction. Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science Technology and Nutrition 2016 pp.77–119; Cambridge UK.10.1016/B978-0-08-100356-5.00005-X ↗
62. 10.1016/j.appet.2007.08.00310.1016/j.appet.2007.08.003 ↗
63. 10.1177/00222437790160011010.1177/002224377901600110 ↗
64. Devellis RF. Scale development: Theory and applications, Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 1991.
65. 10.1016/j.intmar.2018.07.00410.1016/j.intmar.2018.07.004 ↗
66. 10.1108/1061042001035696610.1108/10610420010356966 ↗
67. Qiao X, Wang P, Li Y, et al. Study on a correlation model between the kansei image and the texture harmony. Int J Signal Proc, Image Proc and Pattern Recog 2014; 7(4): 73–84.
68. Vergani G. Fashion dictionary, New York, NY: Baldini Castoldi Dalai Editore, 2006.
69. Sihombing H, Yuhazri MY, Yahaya SH, et al. The Kansei design characteristics towards learning style. J Eng 2013; 7: 1–29.
70. 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.000018410.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000184 ↗
71. 10.1177/014616720427141810.1177/0146167204271418 ↗
72. Westfall J, Kenny DA, Judd CM. Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. J Exp Psych: General 2014; 143(5): 1–26. Doi: 10.1037/xge0000014.
73. Hair JB, Joseph F, Anderson RE, et al. Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective, 4th ed. New Jersey, NJ: Pearson, 2010.
74. 10.1016/0167-8116(96)00002-X10.1016/0167-8116(96)00002-X ↗
75. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.07.00410.1016/j.jretconser.2014.07.004 ↗
76. 10.1108/0263557131130351410.1108/02635571311303514 ↗
77. 10.1108/1750593121127466010.1108/17505931211274660 ↗
78. 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2002.tb01646.x10.1111/j.1540-5915.2002.tb01646.x ↗
79. Wang YS Lin HH and Luarn P. Predicting consumer intention to use mobile service. Information Systems Journal 2006; 16: 157–179.10.1111/j.1365-2575.2006.00213.x ↗
80. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.01.00510.1016/j.foodqual.2018.01.005 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.kjss.2016.07.00710.1016/j.kjss.2016.07.007 ↗
82. Behera RK Gunasekaran A Gupta S et al. (in press). Personalized digital marketing recommender engine. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 2020; 53: 101799.10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.03.026 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.12.03510.1016/j.eswa.2018.12.035 ↗
84. Gussen LC Ellerich M and Schmitt RH. Prediction of perceived quality through the development of a robot-supported multisensory measuring system. Procedia CIRP 2019; 84: 368–373.10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.206 ↗
85. Chong AYL. Understanding mobile commerce continuance intentions: An empirical analysis of Chinese consumers. J Comp Inf Syst 2013; 53(4): 22–30.
86. 10.1108/0263557091093939910.1108/02635570910939399 ↗