journal article·2022-07Open access

Probabilistic model for cattail and canola fibers: effect of environmental conditions, structural parameters, fiber length, and estimators

Md Shadhin, Danny Mann, Mashiur Rahman

Textile Research Journal· Volume 92· Issue 13-14

Abstract

Biomass fibers are being widely investigated for industrial applications as an alternative to synthetic fibers using a standard humidity condition. In this study, the mechanical properties of two waste biomass fibers – canola and cattail – have been investigated when subjected to different environmental conditions, fiber length, and type of estimators used during analysis. The effect of different environmental conditions and structural variations were investigated by measuring the tensile properties after exposing them to eight different relative humidity conditions using a fixed fiber length of 25 mm. Further investigation was conducted using fiber lengths of 25, 35 and 45 mm using the most conservative relative humidity condition. The data were analyzed by a Weibull distribution model using four different estimators. The results revealed that Weibull strength ( σ avg ) and modulus (E avg ) closely followed experimental values for cattail and canola fibers. The different relative humidity conditions and fiber lengths resulted in different Weibull parameters with 11% relative humidity and the mean rank estimator predicted the most conservative tensile strength for both waste biomass fibers. The experimental and characteristic Weibull strength decreased when fiber gauge length increased from 25 to 45 mm. The tensile strength and modulus of both waste biomass fibers at 50% reliability lie within the range of average experimental values. However, these values are reduced to 155 MPa (strength) and 20 GPa (modulus) for cattail fiber at 90% reliability. The survival probability of the tensile strength and modulus were found to be the highest at 75% and 100% relative humidity for cattail and canola fibers, respectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research · Textile materials and evaluations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biosystems Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

Funding

University of Manitoba · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

References (79)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1186/s40643-021-00453-810.1186/s40643-021-00453-8 ↗
2. 10.1002/pc.2625610.1002/pc.26256 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.014 ↗
4. Fahimian M. Processing-Structure-Property Relationship in Needle-Punched Nonwoven Natural Fiber Mat Composites . PhD Dissertation, University of Manitoba, Canada, 2013.
5. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.10.03810.1016/j.compositesb.2017.10.038 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0167-7799(02)01953-410.1016/S0167-7799(02)01953-4 ↗
7. Mazumda SP · 2013
8. 10.1177/004051751988663610.1177/0040517519886636 ↗
9. 10.1007/s12221-021-0194-810.1007/s12221-021-0194-8 ↗
10. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11789110.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117891 ↗
12. Canola Council of Canada. Industry Overview. Canola Council of Canada 2022, December 14, 400-167 Lombard Ave, Winnipeg, MB R3B 0T6, Canada. https://www.canolacouncil.org/about-canola/industry/
13. Erich Haber. Wetlands. THE CANADIAN ENCYCLOPEDIA July 30, 2013; https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/wetlands
14. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.06.00710.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.06.007 ↗
15. 10.1002/app.3030110.1002/app.30301 ↗
16. 10.3390/polym1409168510.3390/polym14091685 ↗
17. Barth M, Carus M. Carbon footprint and sustainability of different natural fibres for biocomposites and insulation material . Hürth: Nova-Institute. 2015. http://eiha.org/media/2017/01/15-04-Carbon-Footprint-of-Natural-Fibres-nova1.pdf (accessed 3 March 2022).
18. 10.32604/jrm.2020.0961510.32604/jrm.2020.09615 ↗
19. 10.1007/s42452-020-03931-410.1007/s42452-020-03931-4 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.clay.2013.03.01010.1016/j.clay.2013.03.010 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10853-011-6025-310.1007/s10853-011-6025-3 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matlet.2010.11.05310.1016/j.matlet.2010.11.053 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.02.01010.1016/j.indcrop.2015.02.010 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.03510.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.035 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.06.01210.1016/j.indcrop.2013.06.012 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.002 ↗
27. Kanade PS. · Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Tech · 2016 · 5 · 3202
28. 10.3390/jcs402006410.3390/jcs4020064 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.02.01810.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.02.018 ↗
30. 10.1007/s10853-011-6191-310.1007/s10853-011-6191-3 ↗
31. 10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00032-X10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00032-X ↗
32. Lamy B · J Mater Sci · 2000 · 19 · 979
33. 10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00040-410.1016/S1359-835X(02)00040-4 ↗
34. 10.1023/A:101796961592510.1023/A:1017969615925 ↗
35. 10.1177/00405175980680090110.1177/004051759806800901 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.01.02310.1016/j.compositesa.2016.01.023 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.03110.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.031 ↗
38. 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00451.x10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00451.x ↗
39. 10.1007/s12221-014-1935-810.1007/s12221-014-1935-8 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.08.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2005.08.006 ↗
41. 10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00051-710.1016/S1359-835X(98)00051-7 ↗
42. 10.1016/S1359-835X(03)00099-X10.1016/S1359-835X(03)00099-X ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.10.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2008.10.001 ↗
44. Djeghader D · Adv Comp Letters · 2019 · 28 · 1
45. 10.1016/S1003-6326(18)64634-510.1016/S1003-6326(18)64634-5 ↗
46. 10.1007/s42765-021-00089-510.1007/s42765-021-00089-5 ↗
47. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.02.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2006.02.005 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.dental.2009.09.00610.1016/j.dental.2009.09.006 ↗
50. 10.1080/15440478.2017.141465110.1080/15440478.2017.1414651 ↗
51. 10.1080/1944702290866148610.1080/19447022908661486 ↗
52. 10.1007/s10853-010-4935-010.1007/s10853-010-4935-0 ↗
53. Nilsson T. Micromechanical Modelling of Natural Fibres for Composite Materials . MSc Thesi, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 2006.
54. Booth JE. · 1970
55. 10.1007/s10924-006-0042-310.1007/s10924-006-0042-3 ↗
56. 10.1007/s13369-013-0897-210.1007/s13369-013-0897-2 ↗
57. 10.13031/trans.1388310.13031/trans.13883 ↗
58. Foulk J · BioResources · 2008 · 3 · 15510.15376/biores.3.1.155-169 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.03.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2011.03.007 ↗
60. Sparnins E. Mechanical properties of flax fibers and their composites . MSc Thesis, Luleå University of Technology, Sweden, 2006.
61. 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.03810.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.038 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.05.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2014.05.006 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.01010.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.010 ↗
64. Ibrahim I, Sarip S, et al. The Weibull probabilities analysis on the single kenaf fiber. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, May; (Vol. 1958; pp. 020009). AIP Publishing LLC, 2018.10.1063/1.5034540 ↗
65. 10.1017/CBO9780511552083.00210.1017/CBO9780511552083.002 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.018 ↗
67. 10.1177/002199830809774010.1177/0021998308097740 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.02.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2010.02.018 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.03.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2007.03.006 ↗
70. 10.1590/S1517-7076201300010000710.1590/S1517-70762013000100007 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.00410.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.004 ↗
72. 10.1002/pc.2384710.1002/pc.23847 ↗
73. Chawlaw N · J Am Chem Soci · 2005 · 88 · 101
74. 10.1007/s12221-016-6176-610.1007/s12221-016-6176-6 ↗
75. 10.1177/004051751773647010.1177/0040517517736470 ↗
76. Ghosh A · Ind J Fib Text Res · 1994 · 19 · 203
77. 10.1080/0040500680865997010.1080/00405006808659970 ↗
78. 10.1155/2013/32508510.1155/2013/325085 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.06.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2015.06.007 ↗