journal article·2022-04

Optimal analysis and application of the warp tension control system for a rapier loom

Yanjun Xiao, Zhenpeng Zhang, Zhenhao Liu, Weiling Liu, Nan Gao, Wei Zhou, Zhe Mao

Textile Research Journal· Volume 92· Issue 7-8
Publisher page

Abstract

Traditional proportional–integral–derivative (PID) control performance optimization is an essential method to improve a loom’s warp tension control performance. This work proposes an improved genetic algorithm optimized PID control scheme to overcome the decline in control performance of the traditional PID control algorithm in a loom’s warp tension control system. Through the decoupling analysis of loom motion mechanism, the establishment of warp tension model and the optimization of fitness evaluation mechanism of genetic algorithm can effectively overcome the problems of local optimal solution and algorithm degradation of genetic algorithm. Simulation experiments were carried out with the traditional PID, the integral separation PID, and the genetic PID in warp tension control. The results show the advantage of the genetic-PID algorithm to control warp tension stability. Ultimately, according to the functional characteristics of the loom mechanism, a tension control platform for experimental studies was established. The test results show that the maximum fluctuation range of warp tension is within [−2, +6] at the test speed of 850 rpm, which meets the requirements of long-term stable and reliable control of warp tension under different weaving conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Vibration and Dynamic Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, People’s Republic of China

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Wang S, He F, Wang Q. Integral separation fuzzy PID control for winding tension system. In: 2019 Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC) . Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2019, pp.4083–4088.10.1109/CCDC.2019.8832428 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.isatra.2020.10.04810.1016/j.isatra.2020.10.048 ↗
3. Sugie N, Okuda H, Suzuki T, et al. Simultaneous realization of planning and control for lane-change behavior using nonlinear model predictive control. In: 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC ). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2018, pp.2406–2411.10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569973 ↗
4. Jiang L, Wang S, Meng J, et al. Inverse decoupling-based direct yaw moment control of a four-wheel independent steering mobile robot. In: 2020 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM) . Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2020, pp.892–897.10.1109/AIM43001.2020.9158953 ↗
5. 10.1177/004051751769398110.1177/0040517517693981 ↗
6. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.298305910.1109/ACCESS.2020.2983059 ↗
7. 10.1177/004051752092860410.1177/0040517520928604 ↗
8. 10.1177/004051751881365610.1177/0040517518813656 ↗
9. Cao W. · Adv Text Technol · 2018 · 26 · 80
10. 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.273480510.1109/ACCESS.2017.2734805 ↗
11. Li T · Meas Control Technol · 2015 · 34 · 67
12. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.635-637.129410.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.635-637.1294 ↗
13. 10.1109/AEECA49918.202010.1109/AEECA49918.2020 ↗
14. 10.1007/s00521-018-3739-z10.1007/s00521-018-3739-z ↗
15. 10.1007/s00521-019-04192-y10.1007/s00521-019-04192-y ↗
16. 10.1177/004051752098258310.1177/0040517520982583 ↗
17. Peng Z · J Text Res · 2011 · 32 · 127
18. 10.1177/004051751668196510.1177/0040517516681965 ↗
19. 10.1177/002199831984042710.1177/0021998319840427 ↗
20. 10.1177/004051751769061910.1177/0040517517690619 ↗
21. 10.3390/electronics802015710.3390/electronics8020157 ↗
22. Sun S · Text Res J · 2018 · 39 · 140
23. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.846-847.15710.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.846-847.157 ↗
24. Shi W. · Electron Technol Softw Eng · 2016 · 21 · 109
25. 10.1177/146441931987639710.1177/1464419319876397 ↗
26. 10.3390/e2103025710.3390/e21030257 ↗
27. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.627.48910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.627.489 ↗
28. 10.1109/JSEN.2019.291284910.1109/JSEN.2019.2912849 ↗
29. 10.1109/ICWAPR51924.2020.949438510.1109/ICWAPR51924.2020.9494385 ↗
30. Jia K. · J Lanzhou Inst Technol · 2018 · 25 · 73
31. 10.1007/s13369-017-2433-210.1007/s13369-017-2433-2 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.solener.2020.02.05510.1016/j.solener.2020.02.055 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.renene.2020.05.09310.1016/j.renene.2020.05.093 ↗
34. 10.3390/s2017468310.3390/s20174683 ↗
35. Karnoub A · J Text Inst · 2017 · 108 · 203
36. 10.1080/00405000.2017.139378610.1080/00405000.2017.1393786 ↗
37. Taieb AH · J Eng Fiber Fabr · 2018 · 13 · 87
38. Chung-Feng JK · Text Res J · 2014 · 85 · 458