Effect of proportion of carbon fiber content and the dispersion of two fiber types on tensile and compressive properties of intra-layer hybrid composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Fourteen types of composite laminates—plain carbon/epoxy composite laminate, plain glass/epoxy composite laminate, and 12 carbon fiber–glass fiber/epoxy intra-layer hybrid composite laminates—were made with different relative proportions of the two fiber types and different dispersions. Tensile and compressive mechanical properties were tested and the results were simulated using the ABAQUS/Explicit commercial software package. The relative proportion of carbon fiber content largely affected the tensile and compressive mechanical properties and the so-called hybridization effect, and should be treated as one of the most crucial parameters. Though the degree of dispersion does not significantly affect mechanical performance, it certainly affects the failure modes of the composites. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that under both tensile and compressive loading, the low-elongation carbon fiber failed first, there was a stress drop in the stress–strain diagram, and then the materials continued extending; meaning that the rest of the load was carried by the remaining glass fibers. With a high dispersion of fiber types, composites tend to fail in a more controlled way, i.e. the curves have a plateau region at the end, and catastrophic failure is thereby avoided.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Textile Science and Technology, Donghua University, China
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. Sudarisman DIJ. Flexural failure of unidirectional hybrid fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites containing different grades of glass fibre. Adv Mater Res 2008; 41–42: 357–362.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.41-42.357 ↗
2. Sudarisman DIJ. Influence of compressive pressure, vacuum pressure, and holding temperature applied during autoclave curing on the microstructure of unidirectional CFRP composites. Adv Mater Res 2008; 41–42: 323–328.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.41-42.323 ↗
3. 10.1515/SECM.1996.5.3-4.10510.1515/SECM.1996.5.3-4.105 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00147-010.1016/S0008-6223(00)00147-0 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00123-210.1016/S0266-3538(99)00123-2 ↗
6. 10.1007/BF0054238610.1007/BF00542386 ↗
7. 10.1007/BF0054084610.1007/BF00540846 ↗
8. 10.1016/0010-4361(87)90003-610.1016/0010-4361(87)90003-6 ↗
9. 10.1016/0266-3538(87)90027-310.1016/0266-3538(87)90027-3 ↗
10. Kalnin I. Evaluation of unidirectional glass–graphite fiber/epoxy resin composites. 1972. Summit, NJ: Celanese Research Co.10.1520/STP27769S ↗
11. 10.1016/0010-4361(74)90107-410.1016/0010-4361(74)90107-4 ↗
12. 10.1007/BF0055319410.1007/BF00553194 ↗
13. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00068-310.1016/S1359-835X(00)00068-3 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.11.14810.1016/j.msea.2007.11.148 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.02110.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.021 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.00310.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.003 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.11.00610.1016/j.matdes.2011.11.006 ↗
18. 10.1002/pc.2220610.1002/pc.22206 ↗
19. 10.1016/0010-4361(90)90444-210.1016/0010-4361(90)90444-2 ↗
20. Hayashi T. On the improvement of mechanical properties of composites hybrid composition. Proc 8th Int Reinf Plas Conf 1972; paper 22: 149.
21. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.08.03710.1016/j.compscitech.2013.08.037 ↗
22. 10.1146/annurev.ms.10.080180.00130510.1146/annurev.ms.10.080180.001305 ↗
23. Shan Y · Int J Fatigue · 2002 · 24 · 847
24. 10.1016/0010-4361(90)90424-U10.1016/0010-4361(90)90424-U ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.04.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2013.04.006 ↗
26. 10.1007/BF0070826610.1007/BF00708266 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.02.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2010.02.003 ↗
28. Diao H, Bismarck A, Robonson P, et al. Pseudo-ductile behaviour of unidirectional fibre reinforced polyamide 12 composite by intra-tow hybridization. In: Proc 5th Eur Conf Compos Mater , Venice, Italy, June 2012, pp.1–8.
29. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.06510.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.065 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.08.02710.1016/j.compositesa.2014.08.027 ↗
31. Chamis C · ASTM STP · 1981 · 734 · 261
32. 10.1201/978142005829110.1201/9781420058291 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.01.01610.1016/j.apsusc.2006.01.016 ↗
34. 10.1002/pc.2101610.1002/pc.21016 ↗
35. 10.1016/0010-4361(93)90260-F10.1016/0010-4361(93)90260-F ↗
36. Bakis CE, Nanni A, Terosky JA, et al. Self-monitoring, pseudo-ductile, hybrid FRP reinforcement rods for concrete applications. Compos Science Technol 2001; 61: 815–823.10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00184-6 ↗
37. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:1(70)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:1(70) ↗
38. 10.1088/0022-3727/20/3/01310.1088/0022-3727/20/3/013 ↗
39. 10.1177/07316844840030020410.1177/073168448400300204 ↗
40. Goren A · Arch Mater Sci Eng · 2008 · 34 · 117
41. Koefoed M. Modelling and Simulation of the VARTM. Process for Wind Turbine Blades . Aalborg University, Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Denmark, January 2003.
42. 10.1115/1.166903210.1115/1.1669032 ↗
43. Khattab A · 2006
44. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.01.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2005.01.001 ↗
45. 10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00012-410.1016/S1359-835X(01)00012-4 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.matdes.2007.01.00210.1016/j.matdes.2007.01.002 ↗
47. ASTM D3039/D3039M-14. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials.
48. ASTM D3171-15. Standard test methods for constituent content of composite materials.
49. ASTM D3410/D3410M-03(2008). Standard test method for compressive properties of polymer matrix composite materials with unsupported gage section by shear loading.
50. 10.1115/1.315366410.1115/1.3153664 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.08.02410.1016/j.commatsci.2013.08.024 ↗
52. Christensen RM · 2012
53. 10.1016/0010-4361(78)90341-510.1016/0010-4361(78)90341-5 ↗
54. 10.1016/0010-4361(81)90417-110.1016/0010-4361(81)90417-1 ↗
55. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01383-110.1016/S0921-5093(01)01383-1 ↗
56. 10.1115/1.400067010.1115/1.4000670 ↗
57. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00048-310.1016/S0266-3538(01)00048-3 ↗
58. 10.1098/rsta.1980.006110.1098/rsta.1980.0061 ↗
59. 10.1115/1.316715510.1115/1.3167155 ↗
60. 10.1098/rsta.1996.008210.1098/rsta.1996.0082 ↗
61. 10.1007/BF0240278610.1007/BF02402786 ↗
62. 10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00100-810.1016/S0263-8223(00)00100-8 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.02.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2005.02.001 ↗
64. Ghiorse SR · SAMPE J · 1993 · 1 · 54