journal article·2020-08

A novel optimization approach to minimize aggregate-fit-loss for improved breast sizing

Jie Pei, Jintu Fan, Susan P Ashdown

Textile Research Journal· Volume 90· Issue 15-16
Publisher page

Abstract

Ready-to-wear clothing is typically based on the body-shape of human fit models that an apparel company hires. The body-shape difference between a consumer and the fit model of their size results in fit-loss of a certain degree. Aggregate-fit-loss is a concept attempting to quantify and estimate the accumulative fit-loss that a population may encounter. This paper reports on a novel method that minimizes the aggregate-fit-loss of a sizing system for bras, through shape categorization and optimized selection of prototypes (which can be regarded as the most appropriate fit models, or standard dress forms) for the categorized groups. A fit-loss function was introduced that calculates the dissimilarity between any two three-dimensional body scans, via pointwise comparisons of the point-to-origin distances of 9000 points on the scan surface. The within-group aggregate-fit-loss is minimized by an algorithm that returns the optimal prototype for the group. The overall aggregate-fit-loss is reduced by breast shape categorization based on the dissimilarities between the scans. Finally, the constraint of band sizes was brought into the categorization to provide a more feasible solution for improved bra sizing. The findings of this study can also contribute to the optimization of sizing systems for other apparel products.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis · Textile materials and evaluations · Color perception and design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Human Ecology, Cornell University, USA

Funding

Cornell Institute of Fashion and Fiber Innovation

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Cain G. The American way of designing . New York, NY, United States: Fairchild Publications, 1950.
2. 10.1108/eb00300810.1108/eb003008 ↗
3. 10.2190/BPTM-FFJ5-Y0FQ-Q47J10.2190/BPTM-FFJ5-Y0FQ-Q47J ↗
4. 10.1108/0955622051057796110.1108/09556220510577961 ↗
5. 10.1108/IJCST-03-2017-002410.1108/IJCST-03-2017-0024 ↗
6. Gribbin EA. Body shape and its influence on apparel size and consumer choices. In: Faust ME and Carrier S (eds) Designing apparel for consumers: The impact of body shape and size . Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 2014, pp.3–16.10.1533/9781782422150.1.3 ↗
7. 10.1057/palgrave.jors.260053310.1057/palgrave.jors.2600533 ↗
8. 10.1097/PRS.000000000000259310.1097/PRS.0000000000002593 ↗
9. 10.1080/00140139.2017.134993610.1080/00140139.2017.1349936 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ergon.2010.06.00210.1016/j.ergon.2010.06.002 ↗
11. Peterson A · J Text Apparel Technol Manag · 2019 · 11 · 1
12. 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00984.x10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00984.x ↗
13. 10.1080/00140139.2011.59751510.1080/00140139.2011.597515 ↗
14. 10.1177/004051751775363310.1177/0040517517753633 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.96810.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.968 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cps.2015.06.00210.1016/j.cps.2015.06.002 ↗
17. Peterson A and Suh M. Effect of Bra Style and Size on its Fit and Comfort. In: International Textile and Apparel Association (ITAA) Annual Conference Proceedings , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 9 November 2016, paper no. 73.10.31274/itaa_proceedings-180814-1454 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.03.00310.1016/j.jsams.2010.03.003 ↗
19. 10.2752/175174109X46751210.2752/175174109X467512 ↗
20. 10.1177/0887302X1985747410.1177/0887302X19857474 ↗
21. Ketron S and Naletelich K. Redefining vanity sizing: when bigger may be better. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal 2017; 21(4): 438–52.10.1108/JFMM-08-2016-0076 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ergon.2007.05.00810.1016/j.ergon.2007.05.008 ↗
23. Yu W · 2014
24. 10.1080/00405000.2016.119595410.1080/00405000.2016.1195954 ↗
25. 10.1080/00140139.2018.148122910.1080/00140139.2018.1481229 ↗
26. 10.1177/0887302X960140011110.1177/0887302X9601400111 ↗
27. 10.1177/0887302X030210010310.1177/0887302X0302100103 ↗
28. Petrova A. Creating sizing systems. In: Ashdown SP (eds) Sizing in clothing: Developing effective sizing systems for ready-to-wear clothing . Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 2007, pp. 57–87.10.1201/9781439824306.ch2 ↗
29. Chun J. Communication of sizing and fit. In: Ashdown SP (eds) Sizing in clothing: Developing effective sizing systems for ready-to-wear clothing . Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 2007, pp. 220–243.10.1201/9781439824306.ch7 ↗
30. Paal B. Creating efficient apparel sizing systems: an optimization approach . PhD Thesis, Cornell University, May 1997.
31. 10.1533/9780857096890.1.310.1533/9780857096890.1.3 ↗
32. 10.1108/0955622041055564110.1108/09556220410555641 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ergon.2007.05.00410.1016/j.ergon.2007.05.004 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.04.00910.1016/j.eswa.2008.04.009 ↗
35. Doustaneh AH · World Appl Sci J · 2010 · 9 · 1359
36. 10.1108/0955622121119432710.1108/09556221211194327 ↗
37. 10.1057/jors.1986.16910.1057/jors.1986.169 ↗
38. Robinette KM, Daanen H and Paquet E. The CAESAR project: a 3-D surface anthropometry survey. In: Second International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling (Cat. No. PR00062) , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 8 October 1999, pp. 380–386. IEEE.
39. 10.1177/0887302X060240020210.1177/0887302X0602400202 ↗
40. 10.1533/9781782422150.1.1710.1533/9781782422150.1.17 ↗
41. 10.2752/175693810X1277462538739610.2752/175693810X12774625387396 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.dss.2013.07.00710.1016/j.dss.2013.07.007 ↗
43. Arbutina M · Acta Technica Corviniensis Bull Eng · 2017 · 10 · 17
44. 10.1016/j.cegh.2018.05.00610.1016/j.cegh.2018.05.006 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.cad.2013.06.00110.1016/j.cad.2013.06.001 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.88410.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.884 ↗
47. Xia S, West A, Istook C, et al. Acquiring accurate body measurements on a smartphone from supplied colored garments for online apparel purchasing platforms and e-retailers. In: proceedings of the 3DBODY. TECH 2018–9th international conference and exhibition 3D body scanning processing technology , Lugano, Switzerland, October 2018, pp.126–130.10.15221/18.126 ↗
48. 10.1080/00405000.2014.94950210.1080/00405000.2014.949502 ↗
49. 10.1177/004051751983939810.1177/0040517519839398 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.apergo.2004.03.00410.1016/j.apergo.2004.03.004 ↗
51. 10.1038/nphys373410.1038/nphys3734 ↗
52. 10.1364/AO.9.00146710.1364/AO.9.001467 ↗
53. Kaufman L · 2009
54. 10.1002/047001108410.1002/0470011084 ↗