journal article·2022-04Open access

A study of the physical properties and bending stiffness of antistatic and antibacterial knitted fabrics

Norina Asfand, Virginija Daukantienė

Textile Research Journal· Volume 92· Issue 7-8

Abstract

Different fiber blends, knit patterns, and treatments may be applied to increase the functionality and comfort of knitted fabrics. In this research, the physical properties and bending stiffness of 1 × 1 rib and half-milano rib fabrics with four fiber blends (90% cotton/10% antistatic PET, 80% cotton/20% antistatic PET, 70% cotton/30% antistatic PET, and 65% cotton/35% antistatic PET) applied to each knit pattern were studied. The effect of fabric direction (course and wale), technical side (face side and back side), and treatment (dying, softening with Aquasoft® SI hydrophilic softener, and Polygiene VO-600 antibacterial finish) on the physical characteristics and bending stiffness of the fabrics was evaluated. The results revealed that dyeing and softening increased the fabric area density and both wale and course densities and decreased fabric thicknesses compared to the control fabrics. The antibacterial finish applied to the softened samples did not change the physical properties. Bending stiffness in the course direction was lower than in the wale direction, and it was higher for technical face samples than for technical back ones. The 1 × 1 rib knitted fabrics showed lower stiffness than the half-milano rib fabrics. Treatment of the investigated fabrics decreased bending stiffness for both treatment sample groups compared to the control group.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Production Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Design, Kaunas University of Technology, Lithuania

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/00405000.2020.177822410.1080/00405000.2020.1778224 ↗
2. 10.1177/004051752093189810.1177/0040517520931898 ↗
3. 10.1007/s10570-020-03215-510.1007/s10570-020-03215-5 ↗
4. 10.1177/002199831983985510.1177/0021998319839855 ↗
5. 10.1177/00405175920620040410.1177/004051759206200404 ↗
6. Emirhanova N · Fibres Text East Eur · 2008 · 16 · 69
7. 10.1108/IJCST-08-2019-012610.1108/IJCST-08-2019-0126 ↗
8. 10.1007/s12221-018-8275-z10.1007/s12221-018-8275-z ↗
9. 10.1177/15589250150100020610.1177/155892501501000206 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.01110.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.011 ↗
11. 10.1007/s12221-018-7690-x10.1007/s12221-018-7690-x ↗
12. Chidambaram P · African J Basic Appl Sci · 2012 · 4 · 60
13. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2010.05.01710.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2010.05.017 ↗
14. Mehmet Emin Yuksekkaya SA · Tekst ve Konfeksiyon · 2008 · 4 · 263
15. 10.1177/00405175040740091110.1177/004051750407400911 ↗
16. 10.1177/00405175000700120110.1177/004051750007001201 ↗
17. 10.1177/004051750707941010.1177/0040517507079410 ↗
18. Hasan KMF. · Int J Text Sci · 2015 · 6 · 119
19. 10.4236/jtst.2018.4200410.4236/jtst.2018.42004 ↗
20. Das S · Int J Text Sci · 2017 · 6 · 64
21. Emirhanova N · Fibres Text East Eur · 2008 · 16 · 69
22. 10.1177/004051751143315210.1177/0040517511433152 ↗
23. 10.1002/jsde.1231610.1002/jsde.12316 ↗
24. 10.1108/RJTA-10-2019-005310.1108/RJTA-10-2019-0053 ↗