journal article·2021-06

Effect of nanoparticles on the mechanical properties of kenaf fiber-reinforced bio-based epoxy resin

EA Franco-Urquiza, AV Rentería-Rodríguez

Textile Research Journal· Volume 91· Issue 11-12
Publisher page

Abstract

Ecological composites materials have become a topic of interest in materials science and engineering in recent years because of the growing need for environment-friendly composites that maintain properties like light weight, but gain biodegradability and renewability. Bio-composites of kenaf fiber-reinforced bio-based epoxy resin filled with different kind of nanoparticles were prepared in this work using a hybrid manufacturing process combining vacuum-assisted resin infusion and an autoclave. Nanoparticles of carbon, metal oxides and layered silicates were employed in this work to analyze their effect on the mechanical properties of bio-kenaf composites. Nanoparticles were synthesized and heat-treated according to their nature, and Fourier transform infrared spectra confirmed the presence of functional groups. Laminar structures, such as graphene or layered silicates, had more influence on the bio-kenaf composite toughness than the particle-like morphology of metal oxides. However, the nanoparticles influenced the strength because of their effective stress transfer mechanism. Despite voids of different sizes, which were detected using scanning tomography, they did not influence the mechanical properties of the bio-kenaf composites, showing that the filler effect of the nanoparticles is the dominant mechanism.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Tribology and Wear Analysis · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Council for Science and Technology (CONACYT – CIDESI), National Center for Aeronautics Technologies (CENTA), Mexico. Carretera Estatal, 2000 Queretaro, Mexico

Center for Engineering and Industrial Development (CIDESI), National Center for Aeronautics Technologies (CENTA), México. Carretera Estatal, 2000 Queretaro, Mexico

References (84)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.03410.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.034 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.11.04310.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.11.043 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.01.04810.1016/j.matdes.2013.01.048 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.coco.2019.09.00510.1016/j.coco.2019.09.005 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10695610.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106956 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.00910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.009 ↗
7. 10.1016/0266-3538(96)00018-810.1016/0266-3538(96)00018-8 ↗
8. 10.1016/0032-3861(96)00144-910.1016/0032-3861(96)00144-9 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0165-2370(02)00047-510.1016/S0165-2370(02)00047-5 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.00810.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.008 ↗
11. Sathyaseelan P, Sellamuthu P and Palanimuthu L. Dynamic mechanical analysis of areca/kenaf fiber reinforced epoxy hybrid composites fabricated in different stacking sequences. In: Materials Today: Proceedings . Elsevier Ltd, 2020, pp. 2–5.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.590 ↗
12. Emran Ismail A, Khalid SNA and Muhd Nor NH. A review on the perforated impact energy absorption of kenaf fibres reinforced composites. J Phys Conf Ser . 914. Epub ahead of print 2017. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/914/1/012044.10.1088/1742-6596/914/1/012044 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.014 ↗
14. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970613)64:11<2073::AID-APP3>3.0.CO;2-G10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970613)64:11<2073::AID-APP3>3.0.CO;2-G ↗
15. Boyacá LA · Ing e Investig · 2010 · 30 · 13610.15446/ing.investig.v30n1.15222 ↗
16. Saurabh T · Int J Adv Eng Technol · 2011 · 2 · 491
17. Ray D and Sain S. Thermosetting bioresins as matrix for biocomposites . In: Biocomposites for High-Performance Applications. Elsevier, 2017, pp. 57–58.10.1016/B978-0-08-100793-8.00003-X ↗
18. 10.1166/jnn.2018.1392810.1166/jnn.2018.13928 ↗
19. Díez-Pascual A. Nanoparticle Reinforced Polymers. Polymers 2019; 11: 1–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11040625.10.3390/polym11040625 ↗
20. 10.1590/S1516-1439200900010000210.1590/S1516-14392009000100002 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.07.26210.1016/j.matpr.2017.07.262 ↗
22. 10.1002/pc.2535710.1002/pc.25357 ↗
23. 10.3390/polym1204074210.3390/polym12040742 ↗
24. Naveed Ul Haq A, Nadhman A, Ullah I, et al. Synthesis approaches of zinc oxide nanoparticles: the dilemma of ecotoxicity. J Nanomater . 2017; 2017(12): 1–14.10.1155/2017/8510342 ↗
25. Hanemann T and Szabó DV. Polymer-nanoparticle composites: from synthesis to modern applications. Materials (Basel) 2010; 3: 3468–3517.10.3390/ma3063468 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.00410.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.004 ↗
27. 10.1080/1023666X.2012.63993010.1080/1023666X.2012.639930 ↗
28. 10.1155/2015/23971710.1155/2015/239717 ↗
29. Chen T, Xia Y, Jia Z, et al. Synthesis, characterization, and tribological behavior of oleic acid capped graphene oxide. J Nanomater . Epub ahead of print 2014. DOI: 10.1155/2014/654145.10.1155/2014/654145 ↗
30. Shao D and Wei Q. Microwave-assisted rapid preparation of nano-ZnO/Ag composite functionalized polyester nonwoven membrane for improving its UV shielding and antibacterial properties. Materials (Basel) 2018; 11: 1412.10.3390/ma11081412 ↗
31. 10.1002/adma.20100106810.1002/adma.201001068 ↗
32. 10.1021/nn100636810.1021/nn1006368 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.489208910.1063/1.4892089 ↗
34. 10.13005/ojc/34012010.13005/ojc/340120 ↗
35. 10.1039/C6RA09292F10.1039/C6RA09292F ↗
36. 10.1177/002199831562578810.1177/0021998315625788 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2003.08.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2003.08.002 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.06.08010.1016/j.ceramint.2016.06.080 ↗
39. Paiva H, Velosa A, Cachim P, et al. Effect of pozzolans with different physical and chemical characteristics on concrete properties. Mater Constr 2016; 66: e083.10.3989/mc.2016.01815 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.10210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.102 ↗
41. 10.1039/C4RA10397A10.1039/C4RA10397A ↗
42. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.05.04310.1016/j.materresbull.2017.05.043 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ssi.2014.10.02510.1016/j.ssi.2014.10.025 ↗
44. Su D · Sci Rep · 2014 · 4 · 1
45. Mohan S, Singh Y, Verma DK, et al. Synthesis of CuO nanoparticles through green route using Citrus limon juice and its application as nanosorbent for Cr(VI) remediation: Process optimization with RSM and ANN-GA based model. Process Saf Environ Prot 2015; 96: 156–166.10.1016/j.psep.2015.05.005 ↗
46. 10.1007/s11664-015-3867-510.1007/s11664-015-3867-5 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.02310.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.023 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.29310.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.293 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jsamd.2016.08.00410.1016/j.jsamd.2016.08.004 ↗
50. 10.1080/03602559.2017.141083210.1080/03602559.2017.1410832 ↗
51. 10.1021/jp403948910.1021/jp4039489 ↗
52. 10.1021/ja01539a01710.1021/ja01539a017 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.photonics.2018.08.00510.1016/j.photonics.2018.08.005 ↗
54. Tran TH · Int Sch Res Not · 2014 · 2014 · 110.1093/imrn/rns215 ↗
55. 10.1002/adfm.20160049410.1002/adfm.201600494 ↗
56. 10.1021/jp806985k10.1021/jp806985k ↗
57. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.06.03310.1016/j.ceramint.2016.06.033 ↗
58. 10.15761/FNN.100010510.15761/FNN.1000105 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.11.02510.1016/j.apsusc.2011.11.025 ↗
60. 10.3390/ma1104049610.3390/ma11040496 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.proche.2015.12.10110.1016/j.proche.2015.12.101 ↗
62. Bonet-Martínez E, García-Cobo P, Pérez-Villarejo L, et al. Effect of olive-pine bottom ash on properties of geopolymers based on metakaolin. Materials (Basel) 2020; 13: 901.10.3390/ma13040901 ↗
63. Boukhoubza I, Khenfouch M, Achehboune M, et al. X-ray diffraction investigations of nanostructured ZnO coated with reduced graphene oxide. In: J Phys: Conf. Ser ; 1292. IOP Publishing, 2019, p. 012011. DOI.: 10.1088/1742-6596/1292/1/012011.10.1088/1742-6596/1292/1/012011 ↗
64. 10.1039/c3ra23455j10.1039/c3ra23455j ↗
65. Mohsen W · Int J Appl Eng Res · 2017 · 12 · 14927
66. Sheno N and Morsali A. Synthesis of different copper oxide nano-structures from direct thermal decomposition of porous copper(II) metal-organic framework precursors. Int J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2012; 8: 99–104.
67. Bhagyaraj SM, Kalarikkal N, Thomas S, et al. Quantum-Dot-Filled Epoxy Nanocomposites With Enhanced Thermal, Mechanical, and Optical Properties. In: Characterization of Nanomaterials . Mohan Bhagyaraj S, Oluwafemi OS, Kalarikkal N, et al. (eds). Woodhead Publishing, 2018, pp. 237–267.10.1016/B978-0-08-101973-3.00009-2 ↗
68. 10.1002/pi.163810.1002/pi.1638 ↗
69. Swaminathan G · Compos Interfaces · 2017 · 25 · 1
70. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10833210.1016/j.matdes.2019.108332 ↗
71. Labanieh A, Garnier C, Ouagne P, et al. Intra-ply yarn sliding defect in hemisphere preforming of a woven preform. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 2018; 107: 432–446.10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.018 ↗
72. 10.1007/s12221-013-0630-510.1007/s12221-013-0630-5 ↗
73. Kolodziejczak-Radzimska A, Markiewicz E and Jesionowski T. Structural characterisation of ZnO particles obtained by the emulsion precipitation method. J Nanomater . Epub ahead of print 13 October 2012. DOI: 10.1155/2012/656353.10.1155/2012/656353 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.wear.2007.01.01610.1016/j.wear.2007.01.016 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.03.08010.1016/j.jcis.2017.03.080 ↗
76. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970620)64:12<2467::AID-APP21>3.0.CO;2-X10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970620)64:12<2467::AID-APP21>3.0.CO;2-X ↗
77. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.003 ↗
78. 10.2147/IJN.S1969310.2147/IJN.S19693 ↗
79. 10.1021/ma501769310.1021/ma5017693 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.proche.2012.06.00610.1016/j.proche.2012.06.006 ↗
81. Balasubramaniam B, Sathiyan G, Palani GS, et al. (2020) Fiber Reinforced Polymer Nanocomposites for Structural Engineering Applications. In: Materials Science and Technology . Cahn R.W., Haasen P. and Kramer E.J. (eds). Wiley, 2019, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527603978.mst0452.10.1002/9783527603978.mst0452 ↗
82. Mohmmed JH · Al-Khwarizmi Eng J · 2015 · 11 · 96
83. 10.1115/1.178995810.1115/1.1789958 ↗
84. 10.1177/002199831982709110.1177/0021998319827091 ↗