Quantitative and sensory evaluation of odor retention on polyester/wool blends
Source abstract
Abstract
The odor sorption and emission characteristics of fabrics affect their functional performance, particularly for sportswear. This study systematically evaluated the impact of wool in polyester/wool blends on body odor retention properties. The odor sorption and emission of polyester/wool blend fabrics were quantitatively evaluated by an infrared-based spectrometer and by sensory testing. It was found that wool had the highest odor sorption capacity among all the test fabrics. Both odor sorption and emission are greatly affected by the presence of wool in the blends. Fabrics containing 20% wool had substantially reduced odor intensity compared to 100% polyester. The body odor retention properties of the 20/80 wool/polyester blend and the 100% polyester fabrics were also compared by wear trial, which further confirmed that the wool/polyester blend effectively reduced body odor intensity compared to 100% polyester. At low levels of body odor, fabric blends with at least 20% wool were shown to perform well, as they may not have reached their sorption capacity. Under higher and more extreme levels of body odor, where sorption plays a more important role, 100% wool showed higher sorption capacity than the blends. The data and methods presented in this paper provide a basis for optimizing the fiber composition of active wear garments with respect to odor.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · Textile materials and evaluations · Skin Protection and Aging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Deakin University, Institute for Frontier Materials, Australia
Funding
Australian Wool Innovation
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/jid.1963.1010.1038/jid.1963.10 ↗
2. 10.1080/0040500070165977410.1080/00405000701659774 ↗
3. Rathinamoorthy RaTG · J Text Apparel Technol Manag · 2014 · 9 · 1
4. 10.1080/00405000.2012.69762310.1080/00405000.2012.697623 ↗
5. 10.1177/004051750708233210.1177/0040517507082332 ↗
6. 10.1177/004051750810062610.1177/0040517508100626 ↗
7. 10.1177/00405175020720120310.1177/004051750207201203 ↗
8. 10.1002/app.2087610.1002/app.20876 ↗
9. Payne JD and Yates JE. Fibres treated with antimicrobial agents. Patent EP1697577(A1), Europe, 2006.
10. Mao JW · AATCC Rev · 2001 · 1 · 28
11. 10.1067/mic.2001.11322910.1067/mic.2001.113229 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.10.00610.1016/j.jconrel.2004.10.006 ↗
13. Joerger MC, Koniz RF, Sabesan S, et al. Antimicrobial Polyester-containing Articles and Process for their Preparation. Patent 7,081,139, USA, 2006.
14. 10.1177/004051751141627410.1177/0040517511416274 ↗
15. 10.1177/152808370935018410.1177/1528083709350184 ↗
16. 10.1177/004051751454076910.1177/0040517514540769 ↗
17. Eza TSM, Ahmad WYW · IEEE Busin Eng Ind Appl Colloq · 2012 · 7 · 210
18. 10.1177/004051750707481610.1177/0040517507074816 ↗
19. 10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00723-010.1016/S1473-3099(03)00723-0 ↗
20. 10.1097/00006454-200010001-0000810.1097/00006454-200010001-00008 ↗
21. 10.1093/chemse/24.6.64710.1093/chemse/24.6.647 ↗
22. Pucher M. Sorption of unpleasant odors by wool. Applied Polymer Symposium 1971; 18: 347–352.
23. Lewin M · 1998
24. 10.1177/00405175690390010110.1177/004051756903900101 ↗
25. 10.1002/ffj.313410.1002/ffj.3134 ↗