Influence of process parameters on the tensile properties of DREF-3000 friction spun hybrid yarns consisting of waste staple carbon fiber for thermoplastic composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Due to their excellent strength, rigidity, and damping properties, as well as low weight, carbon fiber reinforced composites (CFRCs) are being widely used for load bearing structures. On the other hand, with an increased demand and usage of CFRCs, effective methods to re-use waste carbon fiber (CF) materials, which are recoverable either from process scraps or from end-of-life components, are attracting increased attention. In this paper, hybrid yarns consisting of waste staple CF (40 and 60 mm) and polyamide 6 staple fibers (60 mm) are manufactured on a DREF-3000 friction spinning machine with various process parameters, such as spinning drum speed, suction air pressure, and core–sheath ratio. The relationship between different textile physical properties of the hybrid yarns, such as tensile strength, elongation, and evenness with different spinning parameters, core–sheath ratio, and input CF length is revealed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1533/978184569082310.1533/9781845690823 ↗
2. Maurice R. Composite solutions: thermosets and thermoplastics, Paris: JEC publications, 2006, pp. 31–39.
3. Pickering SJ, Turner TA and Warrior NA. Moulding compound development using recycled carbon fibres. In: SAMPE fall technical conference , Dallas, USA, 6–9 November, 2006.
4. Suzuki T and Takahashi J. Prediction of energy intensity of carbon fiber reinforced plastics for mass-produced passenger cars. In: ninth Japan international SAMPE symposium (JISSE-9) , Tokyo, Japan, 29 November–2 December, 2005, pp. 14–19.
5. Kraus T · Report, Carbon Composites e.V.
6. 10.1177/004051751561236310.1177/0040517515612363 ↗
7. Hengstermann M · Text Res J
8. Hengstermann M · Fibres Text East Eur
9. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.09.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2011.09.014 ↗
10. 10.1177/002199831347899210.1177/0021998313478992 ↗
11. Brockmanns K · Text-Prax Int Eng Suppl · 1985 · 40 · 15
12. Brockmanns KJ · Text Month · 1984 · 10
13. Lord P · Text Horiz · 1987 · 7 · 20
14. Hasan MMB · Fibres Text East Eur · 2011 · 4 · 59
15. 10.1177/004051751140737210.1177/0040517511407372 ↗
16. 10.1002/app.3927010.1002/app.39270 ↗
17. Cherif C · 2015
18. Altaş S · Fibres Text East Eur · 2010 · 18 · 79
19. Matthes A · Melliand Textilberichte · 2006 · 6 · 432
20. Salhotra KR · Indian J Fibre Text · 2002 · 27 · 122
21. 10.1177/00405175960660070510.1177/004051759606600705 ↗