Effect of surface density and fiber length on the porosity and permeability of nonwoven flax reinforcement
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents an experimental study and modeling of the influence of surface density and fiber length on the permeability of novel nonwoven flax fiber manufactured by the paper making process. Firstly, the relation between surface density, fiber lengths and pore size distribution measured with a porometer capillary instrument is reported in this study. The results show that higher surface density gives a denser fibrous network with a low porosity rate and longer fiber decreases the total number of fibers and increases the pore size for a given surface density. A liquid permeability study was then carried out to identify the impact of surface density, short fiber length and fiber volume fraction on in-plane impregnation of the reinforcement. Permeability was found to be inversely proportional to the reinforcement of surface density. In contrast, an increase of the fiber length increases the in-plane permeability of the reinforcement. Finally, a mathematical modeling is proposed to predict the permeability behavior of these innovative natural fiber webs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Universite du Quebec a Trois-Rivieres, Canada
École Polytechnique de Montréal, Canada
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/1359-835X(95)00028-Z10.1016/1359-835X(95)00028-Z ↗
2. Gebart B. Permeability of unidirectional reinforcements for RTM. J Compos Mater 1992; 26: 1100–1133.10.1177/002199839202600802 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.11.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2008.11.011 ↗
4. Ledru Y. Etude de la porosité dans les materiaux composites stratifies aeronautiques . PhD Thesis, Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse, France, 2009, p.22.
5. Baichen L · Composites · 1996 · 27 · 13510.1016/1359-835X(95)00012-Q ↗
6. Qiang L, Richard SP and Hermione SG. New set-up for in-plane permeability measurement. Composites Part A 2007; 38: 954–962.10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.06.024 ↗
7. 10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00035-010.1016/S1359-835X(02)00035-0 ↗
8. 10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00183-310.1016/S1359-835X(98)00183-3 ↗
9. 10.1007/978-94-011-4437-710.1007/978-94-011-4437-7 ↗
10. 10.1002/pc.1058910.1002/pc.10589 ↗
11. 10.1177/073168440809397410.1177/0731684408093974 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.02.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2011.02.010 ↗
13. 10.1002/pc.2229010.1002/pc.22290 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.01010.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.010 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.11.03810.1016/j.compositesb.2015.11.038 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.01110.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.011 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.01910.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.019 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.00410.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.004 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.014 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.01.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2011.01.017 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.014 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.02710.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.027 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.11.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2015.11.004 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.07.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2008.07.008 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.01.00310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.01.003 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.06.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2014.06.009 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.01.01110.1016/j.compscitech.2012.01.011 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.01810.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.018 ↗
29. 10.1177/07316840177267863410.1177/073168401772678634 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00093-910.1016/S0266-3538(03)00093-9 ↗
31. 10.1007/s10853-006-1027-210.1007/s10853-006-1027-2 ↗
32. Phillips S, Baets J, Lessard L, et al. Characterization of flax/epoxy prepregs before and after cure. J Reinf Plast Compos 2013; 32: 777–785.10.1177/0731684412473359 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.05110.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.051 ↗
34. Pomeroy RAH. Permeability characterisation of continuous filament mats for resin transfer moulding . PHD Thesis, University of Plymouth, Royaume-Uni, 2009, pp.60–70.
35. LeBel F, Fanaei AE, Ruiz E, et al. Experimental characterization by fluorescence of capillary flows in dual-scale engineering fabrics. Text Res J 2013; 83: 1634–1659.10.1177/0040517512471742 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.05.01910.1016/j.compscitech.2014.05.019 ↗
37. 10.1007/s12289-012-1111-x10.1007/s12289-012-1111-x ↗
38. 10.1016/0001-8686(91)80049-P10.1016/0001-8686(91)80049-P ↗
39. 10.1063/1.36442310.1063/1.364423 ↗
40. Q. Instruments. POROMETER 3G SERIES through-pore size analyzer, 2015.
41. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.02.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2014.02.010 ↗
42. Masoodi R, Pillai KM and Verhagen MA. Flow modeling in natural-fiber preforms used in liquid composite molding. In: Proceedings of the 1st joint American-Canadian international conference on composites , Newark, Delaware, USA, 15–17 September 2009.
43. Francucci GM, Rodriguez ES and Vázquez. A study of the compaction behavior of natural fiber reinforcements in liquid composite molding processes. In: The 10th International Conference on Flow Processes in Composite Materials (FPCM10) , Monte Verita, Ascona (Ticiono) – Switzerland, 12–15 July 2010.
44. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.07.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2009.07.012 ↗
45. 10.1177/00219983980320190210.1177/002199839803201902 ↗
46. Siddiqur Rahman M · Cellulose Chem Technol · 1997 · 31 · 87
47. Vázquez A, Ruiz E, Francucci G, et al. Key factors affecting processing of natural fiber composites. Plastics Research Online , 20 December 2012.
48. 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0341:LNDATS]2.0.CO;210.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0341:LNDATS]2.0.CO;2 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.03.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2006.03.003 ↗
50. 10.1177/004051751142453310.1177/0040517511424533 ↗