Role of fabric properties, moisture and friction in transfer of bacteria from fabric to fabric
Source abstract
Abstract
With increasing reports of textiles serving as vectors for the transmission of infections, it is crucial to study the factors influencing such transfers. This is of concern in various sectors, including healthcare and hospitality, where fabrics constitute an integral part. A better understanding of the fabric types that discourage microbial transfer could help to formulate guidelines for uniforms and other apparels in these sectors. This study aimed to assess the transferability of bacteria from fabrics considering the following factors: fibre and fabric type, moisture and friction. The transfer of bacterial genera important in healthcare settings was quantified with and without application of friction: Escherichia coli and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus from seven different fabrics (cotton, silk, viscose, wool, polyester, polypropylene and a polyester-cotton blend). Amongst the fabrics, transferability was observed to be maximal in polyester followed by viscose, while polypropylene showed the least transfer. Transfer of bacteria was favored by moisture and the application of friction. The study brings forth a correlation between fabric type and the transfer of bacterial cells between fabrics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infection Control in Healthcare · Antimicrobial agents and applications · Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India
Department of Textile Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature0624510.1038/nature06245 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0195-6701(98)90293-610.1016/S0195-6701(98)90293-6 ↗
3. 10.1159/00010865710.1159/000108657 ↗
4. 10.1128/JCM.38.2.724-726.200010.1128/JCM.38.2.724-726.2000 ↗
5. 10.1177/004051751774116310.1177/0040517517741163 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0167-5729(02)00032-810.1016/S0167-5729(02)00032-8 ↗
7. Bajpai V · J Environ Res Dev · 2011 · 5 · 666
8. 10.1128/AEM.01422-1410.1128/AEM.01422-14 ↗
9. 10.3390/ma904024910.3390/ma9040249 ↗
10. Bajpai S · Ind Chem Eng · 2018 · 296
11. 10.1016/j.cis.2012.06.01510.1016/j.cis.2012.06.015 ↗
12. 10.1053/jhin.1999.061610.1053/jhin.1999.0616 ↗
13. 10.1007/BF0298980510.1007/BF02989805 ↗
14. 10.1016/0927-7765(94)01146-V10.1016/0927-7765(94)01146-V ↗
15. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01347.x10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01347.x ↗
16. 10.1002/adhm.20180046510.1002/adhm.201800465 ↗
17. 10.1128/AAC.01993-1310.1128/AAC.01993-13 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.01.01410.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.01.014 ↗
19. 10.1016/0002-9343(78)90777-510.1016/0002-9343(78)90777-5 ↗
20. 10.2307/3014420810.2307/30144208 ↗
21. Little TM · 1978
22. Allen M. The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods . Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc., 2017.10.4135/9781483381411 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0964-8305(03)00104-510.1016/S0964-8305(03)00104-5 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.corsci.2012.06.03110.1016/j.corsci.2012.06.031 ↗
25. 10.1039/978178262653410.1039/9781782626534 ↗
26. Bakterij A · Material Technol · 2014 · 48 · 609
27. Wong KKW, Olsson ALJ, Ashadishad B, et al. Role of cell appendages in initial attachment and stability of E. coli . Langmuir 2017; 33: 4066–4075.10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b00314 ↗
28. 10.1128/JCM.30.4.757-763.199210.1128/JCM.30.4.757-763.1992 ↗
29. 10.1080/14686996.2017.128854310.1080/14686996.2017.1288543 ↗