A study of tubular braided structure with negative Poisson’s ratio behavior
Source abstract
Abstract
Textile structures with negative Poisson’s ratio (PR) behavior are called auxetic textile structures. They have received increasing attention in recent years and have been designed and fabricated through spinning, knitting, weaving and non-woven methods. However, auxetic textile structures fabricated using braiding method have not been reported so far. This paper reported a novel type of auxetic braided structure based on a helical structural arrangement. The geometry of the structure and its deformation mechanism were first introduced and described. Then a special manufacturing process was developed by the modification of commonly used tubular braiding technology. Various auxetic braids were fabricated with different structural parameters and yarns and tested under uniaxial extension conditions. The results showed that all manufactured braids exhibited high negative PR behavior and maintained this behavior until the fracture of the component wrap yarn. Among three structural parameters discussed, namely wrap angle, braiding angle and braiding yarn diameter, the wrap angle had more effects on the tensile properties of auxetic braided structure than the other two parameters. The success of fabricating auxetic braids with commercially available yarns in this study provides an alternative way to manufacture auxetics from positive PR materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Textiles and Clothing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Evans K, Nkansah M and Hutchinson I. Molecular network design. Nature 1991; 353: 124–125.10.1038/353124a0 ↗
2. 10.1007/BF0116600510.1007/BF01166005 ↗
3. 10.1007/BF0003648110.1007/BF00036481 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0958-2118(01)80299-810.1016/S0958-2118(01)80299-8 ↗
5. Scarpa F · J Intell Mater Systems Structs · 2004 · 15
6. 10.1177/00219983930270120310.1177/002199839302701203 ↗
7. 10.1023/A:100483010341110.1023/A:1004830103411 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.235.4792.103810.1126/science.235.4792.1038 ↗
9. 10.1088/0022-3727/22/12/01210.1088/0022-3727/22/12/012 ↗
10. 10.1016/0032-3861(92)90294-710.1016/0032-3861(92)90294-7 ↗
11. 10.1109/84.58578710.1109/84.585787 ↗
12. 10.1007/s00419005011710.1007/s004190050117 ↗
13. 10.1023/A:101292872695210.1023/A:1012928726952 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.02.00610.1016/j.actamat.2005.02.006 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.msea.2005.08.22910.1016/j.msea.2005.08.229 ↗
16. Zhou L Jiang L and Hu H. Auxetic composites made of 3D textile structure and polyurethane foam . Physica Status Solidi (b), 2016.10.1002/pssb.201552768 ↗
17. 10.1002/pssb.20155215810.1002/pssb.201552158 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.05610.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.056 ↗
19. 10.1179/14658010222500649510.1179/146580102225006495 ↗
20. Hook P, et al., Patent number: KR20060009826. 2006.
21. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.01.02510.1016/j.compscitech.2012.01.025 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.346537810.1063/1.3465378 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2011.05.00310.1016/j.mechmat.2011.05.003 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.09.06010.1016/j.matlet.2015.09.060 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.03210.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.032 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.07710.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.077 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.12.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2008.12.016 ↗
28. 10.1177/004051751243682410.1177/0040517512436824 ↗
29. Liu Y, et al. Negative Poisson's ratio weft-knitted fabrics . Text Res J 2009; 80: 856–863.10.1177/0040517509349788 ↗
30. Hu H, Wang Z and Liu S. Development of auxetic fabrics using flat knitting technology. Text Res J 2011; 81: 1493–1502.10.1177/0040517511404594 ↗
31. 10.1002/pssb.20138423910.1002/pssb.201384239 ↗
32. McMullan PJ, Kumar S and Griffin AC. Textile fibres engineered from molecular auxetic polymers. National Textile Center Annual Report, 2004.
33. 10.1177/004051750606525510.1177/0040517506065255 ↗
34. 10.1002/pssb.20138423710.1002/pssb.201384237 ↗
35. 10.1080/00405000.2015.104906910.1080/00405000.2015.1049069 ↗
36. 10.1002/pssb.20108421610.1002/pssb.201084216 ↗
37. 10.1177/004051751245418510.1177/0040517512454185 ↗
38. Rana S and Fangueiro R. Braided structures and composites: production, properties, mechanics, and technical applications . CRC Press, 2015, vol. 3.10.1201/b18787 ↗
39. Kyosev Y. Braiding technology for textiles: principles, design and processes . Elsevier, 2014.
40. Ko FK, Pastore CM and Head AA. Atkins & Pearce handbook of industrial braiding . Atkins & Pearce, 1989.
41. 10.2307/27963610.2307/279636 ↗
42. Boisse P. Advances in composites manufacturing and process design . Woodhead Publishing, 2015.
43. 10.1177/002199831348019810.1177/0021998313480198 ↗
44. Schreiber F, et al. Novel three-dimensional braiding approach and its products. In: 17th International Conference on Composite Materials , Edinburgh, UK, 2009.
45. Ahmadi M, et al. An experimental study on mechanical properties of GFRP braid-pultruded composite rods. EXPRESS Polym Lett 2009; 3(9): 560–5688.10.3144/expresspolymlett.2009.70 ↗
46. Rana S, et al. Development of hybrid braided composite rods for reinforcement and health monitoring of structures. Sci World J 2014; 2014.10.1155/2014/170187 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.rinp.2016.07.00710.1016/j.rinp.2016.07.007 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.04.06710.1016/j.matdes.2014.04.067 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.04.02010.1016/j.compositesa.2016.04.020 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.02.05810.1016/j.compositesb.2016.02.058 ↗