journal article·2013-10

Impact response and damage evolution of triaxial braided carbon/epoxy composites. Part I: Ballistic impact testing

Xuan Haijun, Liu Lulu, Chen Guangtao, Zhang Na, Feng Yiming, Hong Weirong

Textile Research Journal· Volume 83· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

To investigate the high-velocity impact response and damage evolution of the triaxial braided composite fan case, a series of ballistic impact tests using blade-like projectiles were conducted. Cylindrical projectiles of the same cross-section perimeter were also employed to identify the influence of projectile geometry. In addition, satin woven composites were tested for comparison with respect to failure modes and damage shape. Experimental results indicate that the main failure modes for the two different fiber reinforcement architectures are similar, that is, fiber shear failure and matrix crush failure in the impact surface and fiber tensile failure, fiber pull-out, matrix cracking, and delamination in the exit surface. The damage area in the exit surface is diamond-shaped for satin woven composites while rounded or elliptic for triaxial braided composites according to projectile geometry. The triaxial braided composites have an improved ballistic resistance and higher ballistic limit than satin woven composites. Based on damage area and failure modes observed from experiments, ballistic behavior was predicted using an analytical model, which proves to be accurate enough.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Chemical Machinery, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, China

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Moussa NA, Whale MD, Groszmann DE, et al. The potential for fuel tank fire and hydrodynamic ram from uncontained aircraft engine debris. Report no. DOT/FAA/AR-96/95, Federal Aviation Administration, USA, January 1997.
2. FAA/SAE. FAA/SAE Committee on uncontained turbine engine rotor events. Aerospace Information Report no. 4770, July 1994.
3. GE Aviation. GEnx completes successful fan blade out test. www.geaviation.com/aboutgeae/ presscenter/genx/genx_20070705.html (2007, accessed May 2012).
4. Stotler CL and Coppa AP. Containment of composite fan blades. NASA-CR-159544, R79AEG197, 1979.
5. Stotler CL. Development of advanced lightweight system containment – final report. NASA-CR-165212, R81AEG208, 1981.
6. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.03.00710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.03.007 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.08.00410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.08.004 ↗
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2009)22:3(249)10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2009)22:3(249) ↗
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2009)22:3(240)10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2009)22:3(240) ↗
10. Shockey DA, Erlich DC and Simons JW. Improved barriers turbine engine fragments: interim report I. Report DOT/FAA/AR-99/8, Federal Aviation Administration, USA, 2002.
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2006)19:1(38)10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2006)19:1(38) ↗
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2002)15:3(104)10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2002)15:3(104) ↗
13. 10.1016/S0020-7462(03)00018-010.1016/S0020-7462(03)00018-0 ↗
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2009)22:3(270)10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2009)22:3(270) ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.01310.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.013 ↗
16. Kohlman LW, Bail JL, Roberts GD, et al. A notched coupon approach for tensile testing of braided composites. Composites Part A 2011; DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.12.013.10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.12.013 ↗
17. Ruggeri C. High strain rate data acquisition of 2D braided composite structures . Masters Thesis, The University of Akron, USA, 2009.
18. Cheng J. Material modeling of strain rate dependent polymer and 2D triaxially braided composites . PhD Thesis, The University of Akron, USA, 2006.
19. Staniszewski M. Simulation of tri-axially braided composites half-cylinder behavior during ballistic impact . Masters Thesis, The University of Akron, USA, 2007.
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.000002910.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000029 ↗
21. Goldberg RK, Blinzler BJ and Binienda WK. Modification of a macromechanical finite-element based model for impact analysis of triaxially braided composites. J Aerosp Eng 2012; 25: 383–394.10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000135 ↗
22. 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2005)18:1(3)10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2005)18:1(3) ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.12.02610.1016/j.compstruct.2011.12.026 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.09.00610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.09.006 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.09.00510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.09.005 ↗
26. Gogolewski RP and Cunningham BJ, Terminal ballistic experiments for the development of turbine engine blade containment technology. Report no. UCRL-ID-120930, 1995.10.2172/87317 ↗
27. Ambur DR, Jaunky N, Lawson RE, et al. A gas actuated projectile launcher for high energy impact testing of structure. Report no. AIAA-99-1385, 1999.10.2514/6.1999-1385 ↗
28. Carney K, Pereira M, Revilock D, et al. Jet engine fan blade containment using two alternate geometries. In: 4th European LS-DYNA Users Conference , Germany, 2003.
29. 10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00166-910.1016/S0266-3538(99)00166-9 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00037-010.1016/S0263-8223(03)00037-0 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2003.09.04610.1016/j.compstruct.2003.09.046 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00133-410.1016/S0266-3538(97)00133-4 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.08.02210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.08.022 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.01.00410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.01.004 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.01.02510.1016/j.compstruct.2007.01.025 ↗