Anti-ultraviolet treatment by functionalizing cationized cotton with TiO 2 nano-sol and reactive dye
Source abstract
Abstract
A new approach for ultraviolet (UV) protection of cotton fabrics based on TiO 2 nano-sol and reactive dye was studied. Cotton fabrics were cationized with different amounts of 3-chloro-2-hydroxypropyl trimethylammonium chloride. TiO 2 nano-sol was prepared by the sol-gel method using tetraisopropyl orthotitanate and applied on cationized cotton fabrics with different quantities using the same finishing formulation and treatment sequence. Treated fabrics were then dyed with various concentrations of BH-3RS-Reactive yellow 176. Samples were further tested for UV protection factor, color strength, color fastness to washing, durability and tensile strength. The chemical and morphological structures of the coated fabrics were characterized by attenuated total reflection–Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffractometry. Cationized cotton fabrics treated with TiO 2 nano-sol and dyed with reactive dye showed better UV protection with slight reduction in color depth ( K/ S) and tensile strength.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · Skin Protection and Aging · Pigment Synthesis and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Donghua University, China
Key Lab of Science and Technology of Eco-Textiles, Donghua University, China
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.03.00810.1016/j.carbpol.2010.03.008 ↗
2. 10.1002/app.2457210.1002/app.24572 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.09.06310.1016/j.carbpol.2012.09.063 ↗
4. Srinivasan M · Text Chemist Colorist Am Dyestuff Rep · 2000 · 32 · 36
5. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2011.00917.x10.1111/j.1751-1097.2011.00917.x ↗
6. 10.1080/00405167.2011.57002710.1080/00405167.2011.570027 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jcis.2013.03.01610.1016/j.jcis.2013.03.016 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.crci.2005.02.05510.1016/j.crci.2005.02.055 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.02.03910.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.02.039 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.09.09210.1016/j.apsusc.2013.09.092 ↗
11. 10.1021/ic050317610.1021/ic0503176 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.tsf.2008.12.00710.1016/j.tsf.2008.12.007 ↗
13. 10.1007/s12221-011-1037-910.1007/s12221-011-1037-9 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.06.02210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.06.022 ↗
15. 10.1177/152808370934989210.1177/1528083709349892 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10570-011-9554-710.1007/s10570-011-9554-7 ↗
17. 10.1007/s12221-011-0190-510.1007/s12221-011-0190-5 ↗
18. Akgun M · Acta Facultatis Medicae Naissensis · 2010 · 27 · 301
19. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.04610.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.046 ↗