Tactile perception of fabrics with an artificial finger compared to human sensing
Source abstract
Abstract
The assessment of fabric quality is highly dependent on the human tactile sense, which is affected by many factors. There is currently no approach to measure fabric quality directly. To build the relationship between tactile perception and fabric texture, vibration data obtained from a biomimetic sensor while scanning fabric surfaces were recorded and compared with the human judgments. Human subjective sensing experiments were performed with 20 volunteers by classifying texture into 10 grades according to three dimensions: Rough–Smooth, Coarse–Fine and Complex–Uniform. The vibrations and the coefficient of friction (COF) between the skin and fabric were measured using an artificial finger and a tribometer as the artificial finger scanned across various fabrics. Five characteristic values were extracted based on features of the fabric texture from the vibration data: peak average (PA), peak ratio (PR), spectral centroid (SC), power (P) and Shannon entropy (SE).These feature values were evaluated by comparison with those from human sensing experiments. It was found that P, SC, SE and COF could characterize the perceived Rough–Smooth, Coarse–Fine, Complex–Uniform and surface comfort, respectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tactile and Sensory Interactions · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechatronic Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3758/BF0320691610.3758/BF03206916 ↗
2. 10.1080/0142159012008964010.1080/01421590120089640 ↗
3. 10.1121/1.39718410.1121/1.397184 ↗
4. 10.1146/annurev.ne.15.030192.00130310.1146/annurev.ne.15.030192.001303 ↗
5. 10.1152/jn.1999.81.6.270110.1152/jn.1999.81.6.2701 ↗
6. 10.1097/00004691-200011000-0000210.1097/00004691-200011000-00002 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00234-810.1016/S0959-4388(00)00234-8 ↗
8. Loewenstein WR. Mechano-electric transduction in the Pacinian corpuscle. Initiation of sensory impulses in mechanoreceptors. In: Loewenstein WR (ed.) Principles of Receptor Physiology . Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, New York, 1971, pp.269–290.10.1007/978-3-642-65063-5_9 ↗
9. 10.1152/jn.1972.35.1.12210.1152/jn.1972.35.1.122 ↗
10. 10.3758/BF0319353710.3758/BF03193537 ↗
11. 10.1152/jn.1995.73.1.8810.1152/jn.1995.73.1.88 ↗
12. 10.1038/nn158710.1038/nn1587 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0959-4388(99)80073-710.1016/S0959-4388(99)80073-7 ↗
14. 10.1152/jn.1990.63.6.132310.1152/jn.1990.63.6.1323 ↗
15. 10.1080/1944702580866246310.1080/19447025808662463 ↗
16. Lundgren HP · Text Chem Color · 1969 · 1 · 35
17. 10.3758/BF0321179510.3758/BF03211795 ↗
18. 10.3389/fnbot.2012.0000410.3389/fnbot.2012.00004 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.sna.2013.08.01310.1016/j.sna.2013.08.013 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.04.00510.1016/j.actpsy.2005.04.005 ↗
21. 10.1177/004051751243812110.1177/0040517512438121 ↗
22. Fazekas Z, Kömüves J, Renyi I, et al. Towards objective visual assessment of fabric features. In: IEE conference publication , Institution of Electrical Engineers, 1999, pp.411–416.10.1049/cp:19990354 ↗
23. 10.1177/00405175020720100910.1177/004051750207201009 ↗
24. 10.1117/1.356297810.1117/1.3562978 ↗
25. 10.1177/00405175800500100510.1177/004051758005001005 ↗
26. Kawabata S and Niwa M. Objective measurement of fabric hand. In: Raheel M (ed.) Modern Textile Characterization Methods . Marcel Dekker Inc., New York 1996, pp.329–354.10.1201/9780203746684-10 ↗
27. 10.1177/1045389X0607280210.1177/1045389X06072802 ↗
28. 10.20965/jrm.2012.p043010.20965/jrm.2012.p0430 ↗
29. 10.1007/s11249-015-0507-410.1007/s11249-015-0507-4 ↗
30. Behmann F · Melliand Textiberichte · 1990 · 71 · 438
31. 10.1145/1060581.106058810.1145/1060581.1060588 ↗
32. Mukaibo Y, Shirado H, Konyo M, et al. Development of a texture sensor emulating the tissue structure and perceptual mechanism of human fingers. In: proceedings of the 2005 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA 2005) , IEEE, 2005, pp.2565–2570.10.1109/ROBOT.2005.1570499 ↗
33. 10.1126/science.116646710.1126/science.1166467 ↗
34. 10.3390/s9050316110.3390/s90503161 ↗
35. 10.1109/TRO.2011.211693010.1109/TRO.2011.2116930 ↗
36. Kim S-C, Kyung K-U, Sohn J-H and Kwon D-S. An evaluation of human sensibility on perceived texture under variation of vibrotactile stimuli using a tactile display system. In: 14th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, IEEE . 2006, pp.429–436.
37. 10.1177/00405175780480090110.1177/004051757804800901 ↗
38. 10.1007/978-3-319-03017-3_1910.1007/978-3-319-03017-3_19 ↗
39. Fishel JA and Loeb GE. Sensing tactile microvibrations with the BioTac—comparison with human sensitivity. In: 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics (BioRob) , IEEE, 2012, pp.1122–1127.10.1109/BioRob.2012.6290741 ↗
40. 10.3389/fnbot.2012.0000710.3389/fnbot.2012.00007 ↗
41. 10.1080/0040500890865918410.1080/00405008908659184 ↗
42. 10.1080/0040500930865896810.1080/00405009308658968 ↗
43. 10.3758/BF0319353610.3758/BF03193536 ↗
44. Konyo M, Tadokoro S, Yoshida A, et al. A tactile synthesis method using multiple frequency vibrations for representing virtual touch. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems(IROS 2005) , IEEE, 2005, pp.3965–3971.10.1109/IROS.2005.1545130 ↗
45. 10.1007/s00221-002-1015-y10.1007/s00221-002-1015-y ↗