A comparative study of the effects of cotton fiber length parameters on modeling yarn properties
Source abstract
Abstract
Fiber length is one of the key properties of cotton and has important influences on yarn production and yarn quality. Various parameters have been developed to characterize cotton fiber length in the past decades. This study was carried out to investigate the effects of these parameters and their combinations on yarn properties. Linear regression models with different numbers of fiber length parameters and their combinations were developed for predicting ring and open-end (OE) spun yarns’ properties. The R 2 and Mallows’ Cp plots of the models were compared for model selections. The results indicate that, for predicting a yarn property, a model usually involves more than three length parameters to achieve better prediction when considering the R 2 and Cp values. This may be because only one single length parameter cannot sufficiently represent fiber length characteristics. The results also show that the variations in fiber length distributions play important roles in predicting yarn properties, such as strength and irregularity. The best prediction models for the properties of different yarns (ring, OE) include different combinations of length parameters. Not all yarn properties can be well predicted by linear regression models with length parameters: other fiber properties (strength, micronaire, etc.) need to be included to further improve the models.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research · Research in Cotton Cultivation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Louisiana State University, USA
USDA-ARS-SRRC, USA
USDA-ARS-CQRS, USA
Cotton Incorporated, USA
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. National Cotton Council of America. Monthly prices, http://www.cotton.org/econ/prices/monthly.cfm (2011, accessed 22 June 2011).
2. 10.1177/00405175010710110510.1177/004051750107101105 ↗
3. 10.1177/00405175890590111510.1177/004051758905901115 ↗
4. 10.1080/0040500670865995110.1080/00405006708659951 ↗
5. Cui X · J Cotton Sci · 2009 · 13 · 265
6. 10.1177/004051750606261610.1177/0040517506062616 ↗
7. Thibodeaux D · J Cotton Sci · 2008 · 12 · 368
8. 10.1177/004051751038010510.1177/0040517510380105 ↗
9. 10.1080/0040500960865911710.1080/00405009608659117 ↗
10. 10.1177/00405175900600090110.1177/004051759006000901 ↗
11. 10.1177/004051750606226210.1177/0040517506062262 ↗
12. ASTM D1440-07. Standard test method for length and length distribution of cotton fibers (array method). ASTM Standards Vol. 07.01.
13. GB/T 6098.1-2006. Test method for length of cotton fibres, roller analyser. National Standards of P.R. China.
14. Cui X, Cai Y, Rodgers J, et al. The advantage of lower half mean length in characterizing short fibers. In: proceedings of the 2009 beltwide cotton conference , San Antonio, TX, pp.1227-1228 2009.
15. Heap SA. Relative short fibre content. In: proceedings of the international cotton conference , Bremen, Germany, 2004. pp.245-263.
16. Hertel KL · Textil Indust · 1960 · 124 · 103
17. Fransen TJF. Short Fiber Content or Floating Fiber Index. In: proceedings of the international cotton conference , Bremen, Germany, 1984.
18. Mallows CL · Technometrics · 1973 · 15 · 661
19. SAS InstituteSAS/STAT® user’s guide, Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 2008, pp. 5520–5520.
20. Vaughn EA · Textil World · 1977 · 127 · 75
21. Dipayan D · Vlákna a Textil · 2004 · 11 · 94
22. Koc E · Fibres Textil East Eur · 2005 · 13 · 8