journal article·2007-08

Analysis of Two Modeling Methodologies for Predicting the Tensile Properties of Cotton-covered Nylon Core Yarns

Ali Akbar Gharehaghaji, Mohsen Shanbeh, Maziar Palhang

Textile Research Journal· Volume 77· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, the capability of artificial neural networks and multiple linear regression methods for modeling the tensile properties of cotton-covered nylon core yarns based on process parameters were investigated. The developed models were assessed by verifying Mean Square Error (MSE) and Correlation Coefficient (R-value) the test data prediction. The results indicated that artificial neural network algorithm has better performance in comparison with multiple linear regression. The difference between the mean square error of predicting these two models for breaking strength and breaking elongation was 0.365 and 0.119, respectively. The five-fold cross-validation technique was used to evaluate the performance of artificial neural network algorithm. Moreover, the weight decay technique was also used for preventing the memorization.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Textile Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran,

Department of Textile Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/00405175010710041510.1177/004051750107100415 ↗
2. Henl, R. · Melliand Int. · 2001 · 7 · 283
3. 10.1177/00405175560260091110.1177/004051755602600911 ↗
4. 10.1177/00405175670370061710.1177/004051756703700617 ↗
5. 10.1080/19447027.1961.1075048810.1080/19447027.1961.10750488 ↗
6. 10.1177/00405175920620060610.1177/004051759206200606 ↗
7. 10.1177/00405175750450010110.1177/004051757504500101 ↗
8. 10.1177/00405175830530120910.1177/004051758305301209 ↗
9. 10.1177/00405175840540080510.1177/004051758405400805 ↗
10. Kim, Y.K. · Textile Res. J. · 1984 · 54 · 53410.1177/004051758405400806 ↗
11. 10.1177/00405175880580070410.1177/004051758805800704 ↗
12. 10.1177/00405175820520010610.1177/004051758205200106 ↗
13. Hunter, L. · Melliand Textilber. · 1988 · 4 · 229
14. 10.1177/00405175980680101010.1177/004051759806801010 ↗
15. 10.1080/0040500950865877210.1080/00405009508658772 ↗
16. 10.1177/00405175040740090210.1177/004051750407400902 ↗
17. Ethridge, D.
18. 10.1177/00405175040740091410.1177/004051750407400914 ↗
19. 10.1177/00405175000700071210.1177/004051750007000712 ↗
20. 10.1177/00405175020720041410.1177/004051750207200414 ↗
21. 10.1177/00405175970670010910.1177/004051759706700109 ↗
22. 10.1177/00405175040740071710.1177/004051750407400717 ↗
23. 10.1177/00405175030730021210.1177/004051750307300212 ↗
24. Patterson, D.W. · 1996
25. Schalkoff, R.J. · Neural Network · 1997
26. 10.1177/00405175890590010210.1177/004051758905900102 ↗
27. 10.1177/00405175920620020210.1177/004051759206200202 ↗
28. 10.1080/0040500010865956710.1080/00405000108659567 ↗
29. Demuth, H. · 2001
30. Majumdar, A. · Textile Res. J. · 2005 · 30 · 19