journal article·2017-07Open access

Spacer fabric-based exuding wound dressing – Part II: Comparison with commercial wound dressings

Yadie Yang, Hong Hu

Textile Research Journal· Volume 87· Issue 12

Abstract

In this study, a three-layered composite structure based on spacer fabric was designed for absorbent wound dressings. The fabrication and selection of spacer fabrics were discussed in Part I. In this part, two selected spacer fabrics were further modified by covering a polyurethane or a polystyrene electrospun nanofibrous membrane onto their outer layer surface to form the final spacer fabric-based dressing products. In order to confirm the performance of these new spacer fabric-based dressings, the comparisons were conducted with three types of commercial wound dressings. The comparison indicators included the water contact angle, wettability, absorbency, air permeability and water vapor transmission rate. The results showed that in addition to very good water vapor and air permeability, the developed spacer fabric-based dressings had better absorbing properties than commercial foam dressings. Furthermore, their wettability was also good for application as wound dressings. The study has paved a new way to produce advanced wound dressings using three-dimensional textile structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Wound Healing and Treatments · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Textiles and Clothing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Dowsett C · Wounds UK · 2005 · 1 · 58
2. 10.1080/0040516020868895610.1080/00405160208688956 ↗
3. 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00923.x10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00923.x ↗
4. White R · World Wide Wounds · 2006 · 1
5. 10.1046/j.1524-475X.1999.00442.x10.1046/j.1524-475X.1999.00442.x ↗
6. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep1236563710.1111/1523-1747.ep12365637 ↗
7. 10.1016/0007-1226(89)90001-510.1016/0007-1226(89)90001-5 ↗
8. Cutting KF · Trend Wound Care · 2004 · 3 · 41
9. Romanelli M · Wounds Int · 2010 · 1 · 1
10. 10.1016/S0002-9610(03)00307-610.1016/S0002-9610(03)00307-6 ↗
11. 10.1533/9780857093691.1.3810.1533/9780857093691.1.38 ↗
12. 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2001.00050.x10.1046/j.1524-475x.2001.00050.x ↗
13. Puoci F. Advanced polymers in medicine . Rende, Italy: Springer, 2015.10.1007/978-3-319-12478-0 ↗
14. ALLEVYN Ag Adhesive. Retrieved from http://www.smith-nephew.com/canada/products/advanced-wound-management/allevyn-ag-adhesive/.
15. Payne WG · Ostom Wound Manag · 2009 · 55 · 50
16. 10.1097/01.NME.0000350936.42530.fc10.1097/01.NME.0000350936.42530.fc ↗
17. Davies S · Text Mon · 1989 · 37
18. Donaghue VM · Adv Skin Wound Care · 1998 · 11 · 114
19. Torres dCOG · Revista de enfermeria (Barcelona, Spain) · 1997 · 20 · 23
20. 10.1016/j.mpsur.2011.06.00710.1016/j.mpsur.2011.06.007 ↗
21. 10.1016/S1067-2516(97)80003-810.1016/S1067-2516(97)80003-8 ↗
22. 10.1002/jbm.82016030610.1002/jbm.820160306 ↗
23. Ody P. Learning science through the textile and clothing industry . Cambridge: Hobson Publishing PLC, 1990.
24. Leeming R and Woosey KR. Improved compression bandage structures . Google Patents, 2008.
25. Collyer GJ and Gray PA. Bandages . Google Patents, 1995.
26. 10.3993/jfbi0320091010.3993/jfbi03200910 ↗
27. 10.1177/004051751456192210.1177/0040517514561922 ↗
28. Horrocks AR and Anand SC. Handbook of technical textiles . Cambridge: Elsevier, 2000.10.1201/9781439822906 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.04.12210.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.04.122 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.08.01910.1016/j.polymer.2006.08.019 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2009.08.01610.1016/j.porgcoat.2009.08.016 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00136-210.1016/S0032-3861(02)00136-2 ↗