Tensile response of braided structures: a review
Source abstract
Abstract
Braiding is a highly versatile and cost-effective method of producing structures that has been successfully used for numerous applications ranging from ropes, composites, biomedical uses, insulation to sports and recreation activities, and the list of applications of braided structures is ever-increasing. The prediction of tensile property is a pre-requisite for the success of deployment of braided structures in these applications. This paper reviews the key parameters that control the tensile properties of biaxial and triaxial braided structures along with the models developed for these braids by various researchers with different fields of interest. In general, the tensile properties of braided structures are strongly dependent upon their architecture and the kinematics and mechanics involved in the braid formation. Furthermore, various approaches and methodologies have also been presented for the tensile models of braids consisting of an elastic core and multi-layered structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Analysis and Optimization · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Textile Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India
References (85)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S1359-835X(03)00061-710.1016/S1359-835X(03)00061-7 ↗
2. 10.1080/1944701530868787410.1080/19447015308687874 ↗
3. 10.1080/1944702540866263110.1080/19447025408662631 ↗
4. Douglass WA · 1964
5. Goff JR. The geometry of tubular braided structures . MS Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 1976.
6. 10.1177/00405175950650110110.1177/004051759506501101 ↗
7. 10.1177/00405175000700040310.1177/004051750007000403 ↗
8. 10.1177/152808370505757410.1177/1528083705057574 ↗
9. 10.1177/152808370707235410.1177/1528083707072354 ↗
10. Rawal A · Text Res J.
11. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.11.01210.1016/j.compscitech.2013.11.012 ↗
12. 10.1177/00405175040740010410.1177/004051750407400104 ↗
13. 10.1177/004051751142796910.1177/0040517511427969 ↗
14. 10.1177/00405175780480020410.1177/004051757804800204 ↗
15. 10.1177/00405175020720081010.1177/004051750207200810 ↗
16. 10.1080/0040500970865852810.1080/00405009708658528 ↗
17. 10.1080/0040500940863127710.1080/00405009408631277 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.12.04310.1016/j.msec.2014.12.043 ↗
19. 10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00008-210.1016/S1359-835X(01)00008-2 ↗
20. Brookstein DS. Processing advanced braided composites. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Materials Division (Publication) 1988, vol 5, pp.33–36.
21. 10.1016/S0734-743X(98)00059-110.1016/S0734-743X(98)00059-1 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.dental.2006.08.00410.1016/j.dental.2006.08.004 ↗
23. 10.1177/00219983940280070510.1177/002199839402800705 ↗
24. 10.1177/00219983950290170610.1177/002199839502901706 ↗
25. 10.1016/0010-4361(95)92621-I10.1016/0010-4361(95)92621-I ↗
26. Masters JE and Minguet PJ. Effect of preform architecture on modulus and strength of two- dimensional, triaxially braided, textile composite materials. Composite Materials: Testing and Design (Twelfth Volume), ASTM STP 1274, American Society for Testing and Materials 1996; 201–217.10.1520/STP16546S ↗
27. 10.1177/002199830203600845910.1177/0021998302036008459 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00173-610.1016/S0266-3538(99)00173-6 ↗
29. 10.1177/073168440809037210.1177/0731684408090372 ↗
30. 10.1177/073168441349633710.1177/0731684413496337 ↗
31. 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2009)22:3(310)10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2009)22:3(310) ↗
32. 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.000002910.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000029 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.04.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2011.04.003 ↗
34. 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.000000910.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000009 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10443-011-9190-210.1007/s10443-011-9190-2 ↗
36. 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.000036910.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000369 ↗
37. 10.1115/1.283268710.1115/1.2832687 ↗
38. 10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00075-110.1016/S1359-835X(02)00075-1 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.02010.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.020 ↗
40. 10.1177/004051750935252310.1177/0040517509352523 ↗
41. 10.1115/1.283268810.1115/1.2832688 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2011.08.00810.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2011.08.008 ↗
43. 10.1002/cnm.163003050810.1002/cnm.1630030508 ↗
44. Ko FK · 1989
45. 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1992.tb03036.x10.1111/j.1524-4725.1992.tb03036.x ↗
46. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.05010.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.050 ↗
47. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AST.57.23510.4028/www.scientific.net/AST.57.235 ↗
48. 10.1080/1944701490866469410.1080/19447014908664694 ↗
49. 10.1097/00000658-198103000-0002110.1097/00000658-198103000-00021 ↗
50. Fowler G A and Reiniger RF. Some field and laboratory results obtained with Kevlar mooring lines. In: OCEANS 81 , IEEE, 1981, pp.151–155.10.1109/OCEANS.1981.1151459 ↗
51. 10.1177/004051751244534010.1177/0040517512445340 ↗
52. 10.1177/002199830203601346110.1177/0021998302036013461 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.mseb.2006.02.03310.1016/j.mseb.2006.02.033 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.009 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.03.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2007.03.001 ↗
56. 10.1016/S0997-7538(99)00164-310.1016/S0997-7538(99)00164-3 ↗
57. 10.1007/BF0060860710.1007/BF00608607 ↗
58. Foye RL. Finite element analysis of the stiffness of fabric reinforced composites . National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, 1992.
59. 10.1177/00219983980320090210.1177/002199839803200902 ↗
60. 10.1177/00219980177266204610.1177/002199801772662046 ↗
61. 10.1002/pc.75013010610.1002/pc.750130106 ↗
62. Masters JE, Foye RL, Pastore CM, et al. Mechanical properties of triaxially braided composites: experimental and analytical results. J Compos Tech Res 1993; 15: 112–122.10.1520/CTR10362J ↗
63. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.01310.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.013 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.08.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2009.08.001 ↗
65. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00133-410.1016/S0266-3538(97)00133-4 ↗
66. Gowayed YA. An integrated approach to the mechanical and geometrical modeling of textile structural composites . PhD Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 1992.
67. 10.1177/002199830203601046010.1177/0021998302036010460 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2003.09.00310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2003.09.003 ↗
69. 10.1177/00405175950650120210.1177/004051759506501202 ↗
70. 10.1177/00405175840540031110.1177/004051758405400311 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.12.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2012.12.006 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.12.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2008.12.016 ↗
73. 10.1063/1.346537810.1063/1.3465378 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2011.05.00310.1016/j.mechmat.2011.05.003 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.01.02510.1016/j.compscitech.2012.01.025 ↗
76. 10.1177/004051751243682410.1177/0040517512436824 ↗
77. 10.1007/BF0293357110.1007/BF02933571 ↗
78. 10.1007/s10856-008-3646-410.1007/s10856-008-3646-4 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.03.00510.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.03.005 ↗
80. Wu HC, Mandell JF and Backer S. A stochastic treatment of rope strength prediction. In: OCEANS ’90 , Marine Technology Society, 1990.
81. 10.1177/00405175920620070610.1177/004051759206200706 ↗
82. Seo MH. Mechanical deterioration of synthetic fiber rope in marine environment. Doctoral Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1988.
83. Brittain B S. An analysis of the snapback behavior of nylon ropes which fail while under axial loading . Master’s Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 1982.
84. 10.1080/0040500920863122910.1080/00405009208631229 ↗
85. Saraswat H, Rawal A and Singh R. Tensile behaviour of multi-layered braided structures. J Mater Sci 2014; 49: 6427–6436.10.1007/s10853-014-8372-3 ↗