Effect of projectile nose geometry on the critical velocity and failure of yarn subjected to transverse impact
Source abstract
Abstract
Three different types of yarn have been subjected to transverse impact experiments in efforts to gain an understanding of local yarn failure and to provide input parameters for future transverse yarn impact simulations. Dupont™ Kevlar® KM2, DSM Dyneema® SK76, and AuTx® from JSC Kamenskvolokno were selected as representative materials, as the former two are commonly implemented into bullet resistant panels and the latter is a promising material for future impact resistant fabrics. In order to assess the effect of projectile nose shape on the critical rupture velocity range for each yarn type, three missile geometries have been implemented, namely a 0.30 caliber rounded head, a 0.30 caliber chisel nosed fragment simulation projectile (FSP), and a high-carbon steel razor blade. As opposed to one single velocity wherein yarn behavior transitions from transverse wave development to immediate local failure, a range is defined wherein progressive filament failure is detected with increasing impact velocities. Such ranges are determined for all yarn types using the three projectile geometries yielding critical velocity transition regions of increasing value when impacting via razor blade, FSP, and round projectile heads, accordingly. In addition, post-mortem fracture surfaces recovered from impact experiments have been imaged so as to elucidate the mechanism of failure throughout the range of velocities tested for each projectile type and yarn material and said fracture surfaces correlate well with impact velocity and projectile nose geometry.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Purdue University, USA
Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, USA
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas – San Antonio, USA
PM Soldier Protection and Individual Equipment, US Army, USA
School of Materials Engineering, Purdue University, USA
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/00405175730430010510.1177/004051757304300105 ↗
2. 10.1177/00405175920620090210.1177/004051759206200902 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00029-110.1016/S0263-8223(03)00029-1 ↗
4. 10.1177/00405175880580030610.1177/004051758805800306 ↗
5. Cunniff P. Decoupled response of textile body armor. In: 18th international symposium on ballistics (Ballistics ‘99) , San Antonio, TX, 15–19 November 1999.
6. 10.1177/00405175960660010710.1177/004051759606600107 ↗
7. Iremonger MJ. Polyethylene composites for protection against high velocity small arms bullets. In: 18 th international symposium on ballistics , San Antonio, TX, USA, 1999, pp.15–19.
8. Montgomery TG, Grady PL and Tomasino C. The effects of projectile geometry on the performance of ballistic fabrics. Text Res J 1982; 52: 442–450.10.1177/004051758205200703 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0734-743X(02)00055-610.1016/S0734-743X(02)00055-6 ↗
10. Abbott NJ. The variation of the geometry of fragment simulators. SCRDE/91/5. The Ballistic Testing of Personal Armour, 1991.
11. Gibbon R, Carr D, Crawford C, et al. Effect of fragment geometry on ballistic protection. In: 28 th international symposium on ballistics , Atlanta, GA, USA, 2014, pp.873–379.
12. Bazhenov SL · Polym Sci Ser A · 2001 · 1 · 61
13. 10.1023/A:100665530158710.1023/A:1006655301587 ↗
14. 10.1115/1.400428010.1115/1.4004280 ↗
15. 10.1177/00405175580280040210.1177/004051755802800402 ↗
16. Taylor GI. The plastic wave in a wire extended by an impact load . The scientific papers of Geoffrey Ingham Taylor . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1958.
17. Rakhmatulin KA and Dem’yanov YA. Strength under high transient loads. English translation. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, London, 1966, pp.94–152.
18. Cole JD · J Appl Mech · 1953 · 20 · 51910.1115/1.4010758 ↗
19. 10.1016/0022-5096(54)90019-810.1016/0022-5096(54)90019-8 ↗
20. 10.1177/00405175630330110610.1177/004051756303301106 ↗
21. 10.1177/00405175600300060110.1177/004051756003000601 ↗
22. 10.1177/00405175600300060210.1177/004051756003000602 ↗
23. Wilde AF, Ricca JJ, Cole L, et al. Dynamic response of a constrained fibrous system subjected to transverse impact. Part 1. Transient responses and breaking energies of nylon yarns. AMMRCTR70-32, 1970.10.21236/AD0716983 ↗
24. 10.1002/pen.76012010710.1002/pen.760120107 ↗
25. 10.1117/12.2399310.1117/12.23993 ↗
26. 10.1115/1.400431010.1115/1.4004310 ↗
27. Wang LL, Field JE and Sun Q. Dynamic behaviour of pre-stressed high strength polymeric yarns transversely impacted by a blade. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Intense Dynamic Loading and Its Effects, Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics . Chengdu, China: Sichuan University Press, 1992, pp.354–359.
28. 10.1115/1.400432810.1115/1.4004328 ↗
29. Hudspeth MC, Chen WW and Zheng J. Why the Smith equation over-predicts instantaneous rupture velocities during fiber transverse impact. Text Res J. 2015; 86(7): 727–738.10.1177/0040517515586158 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.04.03110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.04.031 ↗
31. 10.1177/00405175740440100910.1177/004051757404401009 ↗
32. 10.1177/00405175770470100710.1177/004051757704701007 ↗
33. 10.1007/BF0096296110.1007/BF00962961 ↗
34. Abbott NJ, Donovan JG and Schoppee MM. The effect of temperature and strain rate on the tensile properties of Kevlar and PBI yarns. Report AFML-TR-65, Part II, Fabric Research Laboratories, USA, 1974.
35. Coskren RJ, Abbott NJ and Ross RH. Kevlar 29 parachute fabrics. In: AIAA aerodynamic deceleration systems conference , Albuquerque, NM, USA, 1975, pp.1–6.10.2514/6.1975-1360 ↗
36. Freeston WD · Int Text Inst · 1972 · 63 · 239
37. Claus WD, Donovon JG and Freeston WD. Devaluation of the mechanical properties of yarns for ballistic applications. Fabric Research Laboratories, Technical Report. 73-60-CE, 1973.10.21236/AD0770470 ↗
38. Mulkern TJ and Rafternberg MN. Tech. Rep. ARL-TR-2865. Army Research Laboratory, 2002.
39. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.06.00510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.06.005 ↗
40. ASTM. D2256/D2256M – 10:2010. Standard test method for tensile properties of yarns by the single-strand method.
41. ASTM. D7269/D7269M – 11:2011. Standard test methods for tensile testing of aramid yarns.
42. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.12.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2013.12.004 ↗
43. Hearle J. Atlas of fibre fracture and damage to textiles . 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: Woodhead Publishing Limited, 1998.10.1533/9781845691271 ↗
44. 10.1002/pen.76011040510.1002/pen.760110405 ↗
45. Abbott NJ, Donovan JG, Schoppee MM, et al. Some mechanical properties of Kevlar and other heat resistant, nonflammable fibers, yarns and fabrics. Report AFML-TR-74-65, Part III , Fabric Research Laboratories, USA, 1975.
46. Warner S. Fiber Science . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall 1995.
47. Dooraki BF. Study of parameters affecting the strength of yarns . Master’s Thesis, McGill University, 2006.
48. 10.1177/002199831038766710.1177/0021998310387667 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.03.01010.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.03.010 ↗
50. DSM. Dyneema Comprehensive Fact Sheet. CIS-YA100, January 2008.
51. Hudspeth MC, Li D, Spatola J, et al. The effects of off-axis transverse deflection loading on the failure strain of various high-performance fibers. Text Res J. 2016; 86(9): 897–910.10.1177/0040517515588262 ↗
52. Hudspeth MC, Nie X and Chen WW. Dynamic failure of Dyneema SK76 single fibers under biaxial shear/tension. Polymer 2012; 53: 5568–5574.10.1016/j.polymer.2012.09.020 ↗
53. Chocron S, Kirchdoerfer T, Scott N, et al. Mesoscale simulations of fabric shoot pack for different materials and configuration. Proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on Ballistics , Freiburg, Germany, 2013, pp.1617–1629.
54. Chen WC, Nie X, Hudspeth M, et al. Mechanical properties of four ballistic fibers. Internal Report PEO Soldier Report, January 2012.
55. 10.1177/00405175000700080910.1177/004051750007000809 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.07.00810.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.07.008 ↗
57. Cunniff P. Dimensionless parameters for optimization of textile-based body armor systems. In: international symposium on ballistics , San Antonio, TX, USA, 1999, pp.1303–1310.
58. Smith JC, McCrackin FL, Schiefer HF, et al. Stress-Strain relationships in yarns subjected to rapid impact loading: Part III: effect of wave propagation. Textile Research Journal 1955; 25: 701.10.1177/004051755502500805 ↗
59. Cunniff PM, Auerbach MA, Vetter E, et al. High performance M5 fiber for ballistics/structural composites. In: 23rd army science conference , Orlando, FL, USA, 2004.
60. Elices M and Llorca J (eds). Fiber fracture . Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 2002.
61. 10.1177/004051750606733510.1177/0040517506067335 ↗
62. Mayo JB and Wetzel ED. Cut resistance and failure of high-performance single fibers. Textile Research Journal 2014; 84: 1233–1246.10.1177/0040517513517966 ↗
63. 10.1115/1.282171110.1115/1.2821711 ↗