Sustainable ultrasound-assisted ultralow liquor ratio dyeing of cotton fabric with natural turmeric dye
Source abstract
Abstract
Natural dyes are environmentally friendly and have become important alternatives to synthetic dyes in some dyeing products. Therefore, better extraction and dyeing techniques need to be developed for the dyeing process of natural dyes. In this work, cotton fabric was dyed using turmeric extraction solution under an ultralow liquor ratio (materials to liquor ratio of 1:5) and ultrasonic-assisted conditions. Dye extraction using different dispersants and pH values has been investigated and three-factor-three–level Box–Behnken design was employed to explore the dyeing conditions. It was found that sodium dodecyl sulfate systems and ultrasonic waves can effective improve the dyeing depth under neutral condition. The K/ S value can reach 2.53 with ultrasonic power of 200 W, dyeing time of 30 min and temperature of 40℃. Scanning electron microscope images showed that the application of ultrasound did not cause obvious fiber damage. The developed technique could be used in the textile industry to make dyeing cotton fibers with natural dyes more sustainable than it is at present.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · Skin Protection and Aging · melanin and skin pigmentation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Textiles and Garments, Hebei University of Science and Technology, China
Funding
the Funding of Hebei Education Department · the Science and Technology Research and Development Program of Langfang, China
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Pratumyot K · Color Technol · 2018 · 45 · 1
2. 10.1016/j.supflu.2015.10.00710.1016/j.supflu.2015.10.007 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.scp.2018.12.00110.1016/j.scp.2018.12.001 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.09.05910.1016/j.indcrop.2014.09.059 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jiec.2014.10.00410.1016/j.jiec.2014.10.004 ↗
6. 10.1111/cote.1221210.1111/cote.12212 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.12.01110.1016/j.dyepig.2018.12.011 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11356-018-1301-210.1007/s11356-018-1301-2 ↗
9. Beiki T · Dye Pigm · 2018 · 29 · 71
10. Ozdo E · Sustain Apparel · 2013 · 5 · 431
11. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.10110.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.101 ↗
12. Ford L · Color Technol · 2017 · 0 · 1
13. Batool F · Polish J Environ Stud · 2019 · 5 · 2081
14. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2008.05.00810.1016/j.dyepig.2008.05.008 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.microc.2010.12.00210.1016/j.microc.2010.12.002 ↗
16. Jameel L · Biochem Pharmacol · 2016 · 4 · 3041
17. Haiwei Y · J Text Res · 2018 · 39 · 102
18. 10.1007/s12221-018-1101-910.1007/s12221-018-1101-9 ↗
19. Adeel S · J Nat Fiber · 2018 · 1458683
20. 10.1080/15440478.2017.134901810.1080/15440478.2017.1349018 ↗
21. 10.1080/15440478.2019.157656910.1080/15440478.2019.1576569 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.17510.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.175 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cjche.2015.07.00810.1016/j.cjche.2015.07.008 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.01.02010.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.01.020 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.04.01010.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.04.010 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.10.00310.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.10.003 ↗
27. Purkait MK, Sinha MK, Mondal P, et al. Ultrasound-responsive membranes. In: Interface Science and Technology. Stimuli Responsive Polymeric Membranes . Elsevier, 2018, Vol. 25, pp. 221–237.10.1016/B978-0-12-813961-5.00008-5 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.08.00210.1016/j.seppur.2014.08.002 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2004.06.01210.1016/j.dyepig.2004.06.012 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.04.01210.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.04.012 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.10.00210.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.10.002 ↗
32. Hassan MM · Ultrasonic Sonochem · 2017 · 29 · 973
33. Zhao J · Polym Chem · 2015 · 00 · 1
34. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.04.01210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.04.012 ↗