Dynamic Moisture Vapor Transfer through Textiles
Source abstract
Abstract
Cotton, polyester, and a blend in plain woven, pure finish fabrics were studied to determine their influence on dynamic surface wetness and moisture transfer through textiles. A simulated sweating skin was used, over which were placed test fabrics incorporating a clothing hygrometer to continuously measure dynamic surface wetness. Moisture vapor concentration and its rate of change at both inner and outer fabric surfaces was determined. At the inner fabric surface facing the sweating skin, all-cotton fabric exhibited the slowest buildup of moisture vapor concentration, followed by the cotton/polyester blend. The all-polyester fabric showed the highest rate of change in moisture vapor concentration. These dynamic moisture changes differ from reports of little or no fiber effect when tested at equilibrium moisture transfer conditions. Indeed the equilibrium moisture vapor transfer also showed no significant fiber differences in this work. It is the short time, dynamic moisture vapor transfer that is believed to hold most promise for explaining wetness and moisture-related subjective sensations in human comfort of worn clothing. The newly modified clothing hygrometer provides a sensitive method for ascertaining dynamic surface wetness on both fabrics and clothing as worn.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Thermoregulation and physiological responses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Textiles and Consumer Economics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, U.S.A.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/00405175840540051010.1177/004051758405400510 ↗
2. 10.1080/1944702460865980110.1080/19447024608659801 ↗
3. Behmann F. W., Influence of the Sorption Properties of Clothing on Sweat Loss and the Subjective Feeling of Sweating, Applied Polymer Symposium No. 18, Pt. 2, 1477–82, 1971.
4. 10.1177/00405175860560030110.1177/004051758605600301 ↗
5. 10.1177/00405175840540070710.1177/004051758405400707 ↗
6. 10.1177/00405175840540090810.1177/004051758405400908 ↗
7. 10.1080/0040500840865847310.1080/00405008408658473 ↗
8. 10.1177/00405175850550101010.1177/004051758505501010 ↗
9. 10.1177/00405175570270050410.1177/004051755702700504 ↗
10. 10.1177/00405175470170050210.1177/004051754701700502 ↗
11. 10.1177/00405175870570100610.1177/004051758705701006 ↗
12. 10.1177/00405175520220120710.1177/004051755202201207 ↗
13. Hollies N. R. S., The Comfort Characteristics of Next-to-Skin Garments, Including Shirts, Shirley Int. Sem. Text. Comfort., Manchester, 1971.
14. 10.1177/00405175840540080710.1177/004051758405400807 ↗
15. Hollies N. R. S., Baseline Tests for the Comfort of Clothing, paper presented at Technical Forum. II, Am. Apparel Manuf. Assoc. 1977.
16. Hollies N. R. S., Hall P., Comfort Acceptance in Knit Structures, AATCC. Symp. No. 17, 88–93, 1975.
17. Hollies N. R. S., Penoyer J. A.Sr., Clothing Hygrometer, U.S. Patent 3,550,439, Dec. 1970.
18. Hough P. S., Seaborn J. C., Hollies N. R. S., Fiber Pores and Internal Surface: Importance and Measurement, personal communication.
19. Kim J. O. · 1987
20. La Motte R. H. · 1977
21. Latta B. M. · 1977
22. Mansberg H. P. · 1963 · 3
23. 10.1080/1944702650866230210.1080/19447026508662302 ↗
24. 10.1080/1944702450865971310.1080/19447024508659713 ↗
25. 10.1177/00405175850550070210.1177/004051758505500702 ↗
26. 10.1177/00405175860560071210.1177/004051758605600712 ↗
27. Scheurell D. M. · 1986
28. 10.1177/00405175860560090710.1177/004051758605600907 ↗
29. Weiner L., Moisture Vapor Transmission in Textile Fabrics, 3rd Shirley Int. Sem. 1–29, 1971.
30. 10.1177/00405175550250030110.1177/004051755502500301 ↗
31. 10.1177/00405175840540050210.1177/004051758405400502 ↗