Relationships of cotton fiber properties to ring-spun yarn quality on selected High Plains cottons
Source abstract
Abstract
Cotton fiber properties play an important role in determining spinning performance but explain only a portion of the variability in final yarn quality parameters. This research investigates relationships between ring-spun yarn quality and fiber properties (measured using the High Volume Instrument (HVI) and Advanced Fiber Information System (AFIS)) given additional information on harvest method and cultivar. Seventy-six samples of commercially grown cotton representing five cultivars from six locations across the Texas High Plains were collected over three years. Carded 14.5 tex (40 Ne) ring-spun yarns were produced and tested for various yarn quality characteristics. Principal component analysis and partial least squares regression were used to determine relationships between fiber and yarn properties. Neither harvest method nor cultivar explained a significant portion of yarn quality variability beyond that captured by HVI and AFIS results. Yarn work-to-break was highly correlated to fiber bundle elongation, which is not currently reported in official cotton classing reports.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Research in Cotton Cultivation · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA.
Fiber and Biopolymer Research Institute and Department of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
USDA-ARS Cotton Production and Processing Research Unit, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Southwest Research and Extension Center, Oklahoma State University, Altus, Oklahoma, USA.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. National Cotton Council. ‘Country Statistics’, http://www.cotton.org (2010, accessed June 2010).
2. United States Census Bureau · 2005
3. United States Census Bureau · 2010
4. Plastina A · 2009
5. International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC) · 2010
6. United States Department of Agriculture - National Agricultural Statistics Service. ‘US Cotton Production. National Agricultural Statistics Database’, http://www.nass.usda.gov (2010, accessed June 2010).
7. Cotton Incorporated · 2009
8. Hequet EF · 2009
9. McCreight DJ · 1997
10. 10.1177/00405175010710110810.1177/004051750107101108 ↗
11. Krifa M · Textil Top · 2007 · 1 · 2
12. Krifa M · 2011
13. 10.13031/2013.3819610.13031/2013.38196 ↗
14. 10.13031/2013.3819710.13031/2013.38197 ↗
15. 10.13031/2013.3819910.13031/2013.38199 ↗
16. ASTM · 2009
17. Esbensen KH · 2004
18. 10.1177/00405175770470100810.1177/004051757704701008 ↗
19. 10.1177/00405175780480050810.1177/004051757804800508 ↗
20. 10.1177/004051750606226210.1177/0040517506062262 ↗
21. 10.1177/00405175880580070410.1177/004051758805800704 ↗
22. 10.1177/00405175900600090110.1177/004051759006000901 ↗
23. 10.1177/00405175560260071010.1177/004051755602600710 ↗
24. 10.1177/00405175560260030210.1177/004051755602600302 ↗
25. 10.1177/00405175660360110910.1177/004051756603601109 ↗
26. 10.1177/00405175670370061710.1177/004051756703700617 ↗
27. 10.1177/00405175040740071710.1177/004051750407400717 ↗
28. 10.1177/00405175890590111210.1177/004051758905901112 ↗
29. 10.1177/004051750708068910.1177/0040517507080689 ↗
30. Wakelyn PJ · 2007
31. 10.13031/2013.1732610.13031/2013.17326 ↗
32. 10.1080/0040500880865913510.1080/00405008808659135 ↗
33. 10.1177/00405175890590111510.1177/004051758905901115 ↗
34. 10.1177/00405175970670090910.1177/004051759706700909 ↗
35. 10.1177/00405175040740070610.1177/004051750407400706 ↗
36. 10.1177/00405175040740080110.1177/004051750407400801 ↗
37. 10.1177/004051750707978110.1177/0040517507079781 ↗