Categorization of lower body shapes for adult females based on multiple view analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Body shapes are generally identified by subjective comparisons of body silhouettes or by calculating ratios of girths. In this study, we developed a reliable and objective categorization method for the lower body shapes of women using principal component (PC) analysis and cluster analysis. A total of 2,488 women aged 18—35 within the 90th percentile of body mass index (34.14) were selected from SizeUSA body scan data. Body measurements chosen for the analysis include buttocks angle and 14 proportional measures of widths, depths, front/back depths, girths, and front/back arcs of key lower body locations. Five PCs were extracted, but only the first three components made a strong contribution to explained variance (PC1: waist to top hip silhouette, PC2: top hip to full hip silhouette, and PC3: buttocks prominence). However, PC4 (abdomen prominence) and PC5 (slope from abdomen point to front hip point) were also critical for representing a distinctive shape. They had a single variable, and therefore each variable was retained as z-score. Three body shape groups were categorized by K-means cluster analysis using three PC scores and two z-scores. In order to provide a simple and intuitive application method for defining a new person’s body shape group, we developed two discriminant functions using raw measurements. Body shape can be classified within our system from body measurements by calculating function scores and comparing them with a bivariate plot of function scores of the body shape groups.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis · Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Cornell University, USA,
Cornell University, USA
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Cotton Incorporated. · 2002
2. 10.1108/0955622051057796110.1108/09556220510577961 ↗
3. Kurt Salmon Associates.
4. Charoensiriwath S.
5. 2009
6. Archetype Solutions. · 2010
7. Zafu. · 2009
8. Ashdown SP · 2000
9. Simmons KP · J Fashion Mark Manage · 2004 · 4 · 1
10. 10.1177/0887302X060240020610.1177/0887302X0602400206 ↗
11. 10.1177/0887302X060240020310.1177/0887302X0602400203 ↗
12. O’Brien R. · 1941
13. Churchill E. · 1977
14. Green ME · Clothing Res J · 1981 · 9 · 16
15. 10.1177/0887302X850040010610.1177/0887302X8500400106 ↗
16. 10.1177/0887302X060240020410.1177/0887302X0602400204 ↗
17. Watkins SM · 1995
18. International Organization for Standardization. · 1991
19. DOB-Verband. · 1983
20. Japanese Standards Association. · 2001
21. Korean Standard Association. · 2009
22. 10.1177/0887302X900080020610.1177/0887302X9000800206 ↗
23. 2003
24. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. · 2009
25. Warner RM · 2008
26. McConville JT Anthropometry in sizing and design. In: Anthropometric source book, NASA reference publication 1024, volume 1: anthropometry for designers . Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1978, Chapter VIII.