Quasi-static indentation, mechanical, and damage evolution of different configurations of laminated banana–pineapple fiber-reinforced composites for structural application
Source abstract
Abstract
Driven by the demand for environmentally sustainable, cost-effective, and lightweight materials, cellulosic fiber-reinforced composites offer a promising alternative to traditional non-renewable materials due to their biodegradability, compatibility, durability, and lower carbon emissions. This study investigated the mechanical performances and damage evaluation of cellulosic banana–pineapple fiber-reinforced polymer composites. The research focused on creating eight distinct composite samples under the influence of different stacking configurations of banana fiber and pineapple leaf fiber (BBBB, BBPP, PPBB, BPPB, PBBP, BPBP, PBBP, PPPP) through a compression molding technique. Preliminary findings suggested that the hybridization of banana with pineapple fibers not only enhanced the mechanical strength, elasticity, and rigidity of the composites but also contributed to their overall sustainability and durability, and produced lightweight materials. The results observed that the stacking of banana provided greater strength and rigidity, while pineapple fiber provided higher flexibility and stiffness. Thus, BPBP composites showed 40.17%, 60.56%, 54.88%, and 50.23% higher tensile strength, shear strength, impact strength, and energy absorption as compared with PPPP composites. The flexural strength was higher for BBPP composites, which was 72.55% higher than PPPP composites. By using hybridization to overcome the drawbacks of natural fibers, this effort opens the door for creative materials science solutions that create lightweight components with great energy absorption and environmental sustainability for applications in a variety of sectors, including construction, automotive, and aerospace.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Hindustan Institute of Technology & Science, Kelambakkam, India
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dayanand Sagar College of Engineering, Bangalore, India
Dr. D.Y. Patil School of Science and Technology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Department of Mechanical Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Tiruchirappalli, India
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.aat907210.1126/science.aat9072 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10965-021-02799-110.1007/s10965-021-02799-1 ↗
3. 10.1177/0954406221106375210.1177/09544062211063752 ↗
4. 10.1007/s11665-020-04845-310.1007/s11665-020-04845-3 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.19710.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.197 ↗
6. Mahakur VK, Bhowmik S, Patowari PK. Experimental evaluation and prediction on drilling of Corchorus olitorius filler-based composite. Mater Manuf Processes 2024; 1–10.
7. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.10110.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.101 ↗
8. 10.1002/pi.658910.1002/pi.6589 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.01910.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.019 ↗
10. 10.1002/pc.2616410.1002/pc.26164 ↗
11. 10.1080/1023666X.2016.118327610.1080/1023666X.2016.1183276 ↗
12. 10.1007/s12221-017-7682-x10.1007/s12221-017-7682-x ↗
13. Kumar S, Saha A. Utilization of coconut shell biomass residue to develop sustainable biocomposites and characterize the physical, mechanical, thermal, and water absorption properties. Biomass Convers Biorefin 2022; 1–17.
14. 10.1002/app.5404010.1002/app.54040 ↗
15. 10.1007/s13399-021-01794-210.1007/s13399-021-01794-2 ↗
16. 10.1177/073168441984970810.1177/0731684419849708 ↗
17. 10.1007/s12221-015-0918-810.1007/s12221-015-0918-8 ↗
18. 10.1002/app.5146510.1002/app.51465 ↗
19. 10.1515/ipp-2023-434110.1515/ipp-2023-4341 ↗
20. 10.1080/09506608.2016.127108910.1080/09506608.2016.1271089 ↗
21. 10.3390/ma1314316710.3390/ma13143167 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10965-021-02435-y10.1007/s10965-021-02435-y ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.01410.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.014 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.02.03310.1016/j.compositesb.2013.02.033 ↗
25. 10.1007/s12633-015-9314-710.1007/s12633-015-9314-7 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.05810.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.058 ↗
27. 10.1002/pc.2497810.1002/pc.24978 ↗
28. 10.1177/0954406221102310510.1177/09544062211023105 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e1979210.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19792 ↗
30. 10.7569/JRM.2017.63414810.7569/JRM.2017.634148 ↗
31. 10.1515/ipp-2022-423810.1515/ipp-2022-4238 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.30410.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.304 ↗
33. Arpitha GR, Jain N, Verma A. Banana biofiber and glass fiber reinforced hybrid composite for lightweight structural applications: mechanical, thermal, and microstructural characterization. Biomass Convers Biorefin 2023; 1–10.
34. 10.1002/pc.2478910.1002/pc.24789 ↗
35. ASTM Standard D 2734-70. Standard test method for density and void content of reinforced plastics. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1985.
36. ASTM D3039/D3039M-00. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. American Society for Testing Materials [CD-ROM] 2004.
37. ASTM Standard D790. Standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2010.
38. ASTM D256-10. Standard test method for determining izod pendulum impact resistance of plastics. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society of Testing and Materials, 2010.
39. Standard Test Method for Short-Beam Strength of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials and Their Laminates ASTM D2344/D2344M-16. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM International approved July 1 2016.
40. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2017.11.00510.1016/j.mechmat.2017.11.005 ↗
41. 10.5545/sv-jme.2010.17010.5545/sv-jme.2010.170 ↗
42. Friedrich K Ueda E Kamo H et al. Direct electron microscopic observation of transcrystalline layers in microfibrillar reinforced polymer-polymer composites. Journal of materials science 2002; 37: 4299–305.10.1023/A:1020692200486 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.03310.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.033 ↗
44. Saha A, Kumar S, Zindani D, et al. Micro-mechanical analysis of the pineapple-reinforced polymeric composite by the inclusion of pineapple leaf particulates. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L: J Mater Des Appl 2021; 235(5): 1112–1127.
45. Subramanya R, Reddy DS, Sathyanarayana PS. Tensile, impact and fracture toughness properties of banana fibre-reinforced polymer composites. Adv Mater Process Technol 2020; 6(4): 661–668.
46. 10.1007/s13369-023-08247-010.1007/s13369-023-08247-0 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.10.04210.1016/j.indcrop.2014.10.042 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.02710.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.027 ↗
49. 10.1177/0954408922113115510.1177/09544089221131155 ↗
50. 10.1177/002199832092850910.1177/0021998320928509 ↗
51. 10.1080/15440478.2014.92955510.1080/15440478.2014.929555 ↗
52. 10.3390/polym1322393610.3390/polym13223936 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.11621210.1016/j.indcrop.2022.116212 ↗
54. 10.1177/002199831880952510.1177/0021998318809525 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.03.04710.1016/j.msea.2011.03.047 ↗
56. 10.1080/1023666X.2020.178148110.1080/1023666X.2020.1781481 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.crgsc.2022.10028410.1016/j.crgsc.2022.100284 ↗
58. Ng LF, Dhar Malingam S, Subramaniam K, et al. The investigation of the tensile and quasi-static indentation properties of pineapple leaf/kevlar fibre reinforced hybrid composites. Def ST Tech Bull 2020; 13(1): 117–129.
59. 10.1080/09276440.2018.144483210.1080/09276440.2018.1444832 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.tws.2021.10876010.1016/j.tws.2021.108760 ↗
61. 10.1080/19397038.2021.196612710.1080/19397038.2021.1966127 ↗
62. Amir SMM Sultan MTH Jawaid M et al. Nondestructive testing method for Kevlar and natural fiber and their hybrid composites. In: Durability and life prediction in biocomposites fibre-reinforced composites and hybrid composites. Woodhead Publishing 2019 pp. 367–388.10.1016/B978-0-08-102290-0.00016-7 ↗
63. 10.1177/0021998321105070510.1177/00219983211050705 ↗
64. 10.1007/s10921-014-0249-510.1007/s10921-014-0249-5 ↗
65. 10.1007/s00289-020-03228-x10.1007/s00289-020-03228-x ↗
66. 10.5545/sv-jme.2010.17010.5545/sv-jme.2010.170 ↗
67. 10.1515/mt-2020-002010.1515/mt-2020-0020 ↗
68. Loganathan TM Sultan MT Gobalakrishnan MK. Ultrasonic inspection of natural fiber-reinforced composites. In Sustainable composites for aerospace applications. Woodhead Publishing 2018 pp. 227–251.10.1016/B978-0-08-102131-6.00011-6 ↗
69. 10.1515/ipp-2022-427410.1515/ipp-2022-4274 ↗
70. Kumar N, Chellam GK, Ningegowda BM, et al. Exploration of failure and delamination damage analysis of adhesive-bonded composite joints. Compos Mech Comput Appl 2025; 16(2).
71. 10.1080/15440478.2020.184873410.1080/15440478.2020.1848734 ↗