Effects of temperature and humidity on high-strength p -aramid fibers used in body armor
Source abstract
Abstract
To improve the reliability and design of body armor, it is imperative to understand the failure modes and the degradation rates of the materials used in armor. Despite the best efforts of manufacturers, some vulnerability of armor materials to aging due to hydrolytic or oxidative environments is expected and may result in the degradation of material properties such as tensile strength. In this work, p-aramid yarns from two manufacturers were exposed to environmental conditions of various fixed temperature and humidity combinations. The maximum temperature and humidity condition was 70℃ and 76% relative humidity (RH). Tensile tests were performed on specimens extracted at several different times over the course of at least 1 year to determine the change in ultimate tensile strength and failure strain as a function of time, temperature, and humidity. Molecular spectroscopy was used to investigate any chemical changes as a result of the aging. The p-aramid materials were found to be generally resistant to degradation at most conditions, showing changes of less than 10% only at the highest temperature and humidity conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA
Theiss Research, USA
Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Department, University of Maryland, USA
Richard Montgomery High School, USA
Montgomery College, USA
Materials Science and Engineering Department, University of Maryland, USA
Funding
National Institute of Standards and Technology
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.10.00410.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.10.004 ↗
2. Chin J, Byrd E, Clerici C, et al. Chemical and physical characterization of poly(p-phenylene-2,6-benzobisoxazole) fibers used in body armor used in body armor: Temperature and humidity aging. NISTIR 7373 , 2007.10.6028/NIST.IR.7373 ↗
3. Forster AL, Rice KD, Riley MA, et al. Development of soft armor conditioning protocols for NIJ Standard–0101.06: Analytical results. NISTIR 7627 , 2009.10.6028/NIST.IR.7627 ↗
4. National Institute of Justice · 2008
5. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.01.02810.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.01.028 ↗
6. Tompkins D · NIJ J · 2006 · 254 · 1
7. IACP/DuPont™ Kevlar® Survivors’ Club®, https://www.dupont.com/military-law-enforcement-and-emergency-response/the-kevlar-survivors-club.html (accessed 13 November 2019).
8. DuPont Kevlar Survivor’s Club: Rational Replacement Policy – A Recommendation to the Law Enforcement Community. Congress of the United States Office of Technology Assessment 1985; 294: 1302–1310.
9. Frank D. Ballistic Tests of Used Soft Body Armor. NBSIR 86-3444 , 1986.10.6028/NBS.IR.86-3444 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.05.01510.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.05.015 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10853-011-6073-810.1007/s10853-011-6073-8 ↗
12. 10.1002/app.1989.07037081310.1002/app.1989.070370813 ↗
13. Derombise G · J Appl Polym Sci · 2010 · 116 · 250410.1002/app.31145 ↗
14. 10.1007/BF0029744010.1007/BF00297440 ↗
15. Guangming C, Haihua Y and Weidong W. Evaluation of light and thermal aging performance of aramid fabric. In: Textile Bioengineering and Informatics Symposium Proceedings . 2008, pp. 321–325.
16. Obaid AA · J Compos Mater · 2015 · 002199831557475
17. 10.1177/002199831038143610.1177/0021998310381436 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2006.03.02510.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2006.03.025 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0141-3910(01)00159-810.1016/S0141-3910(01)00159-8 ↗
20. 10.1177/002199831038143610.1177/0021998310381436 ↗
21. 10.1016/0032-3861(89)90108-010.1016/0032-3861(89)90108-0 ↗
22. 10.1016/0033-0655(93)80004-T10.1016/0033-0655(93)80004-T ↗
23. Kampf G · Prog Org Coatings · 1991 · 19 · 6910.1016/0033-0655(91)80011-7 ↗
24. 10.1177/00405175980680080710.1177/004051759806800807 ↗
25. Hearle JWS · 2001
26. McDonough WG, Holmes GA, Forster AL, et al. A graphical approach for assessing high-strength fiber performance. In: SAMPE 2010 Annual Technical Conference . 2010, p. 9.
27. Cunniff PM. Dimensionless parameters for optimization of textile-based armor systems. In: 18th International Symposium on Ballistics . San Antonio, TX, 1999, pp. 1302–1310.
28. ASTM E3110-18 Standard Test Method for Collection of Ballistic Limit Data for Ballistic-resistant Torso Body Armor and Shoot Packs .
29. 10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00329-910.1016/S0020-7683(03)00329-9 ↗
30. 10.1007/s10853-019-04063-w10.1007/s10853-019-04063-w ↗
31. ASTM D2256-02 Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Yarn by the Single-Strand Method . ASTM International, 2002.
32. Engelbrecht-Wiggans A and Forster AL. Ageing of high strength p-aramid fibers used in body armor. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Data Catalog , 2019. Available at: https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/ageing-of-high-strength-p-aramid-fibers-used-in-body-armor.
33. Forster AL · J Vis Exp · 2018 · e58124
34. 10.1177/00405175910610110710.1177/004051759106101107 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ces.2004.02.01110.1016/j.ces.2004.02.011 ↗
36. 10.1016/0032-3861(94)90502-910.1016/0032-3861(94)90502-9 ↗
37. 10.1177/00405175930630040110.1177/004051759306300401 ↗
38. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19970715)35:9<1423::AID-POLB12>3.0.CO;2-810.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19970715)35:9<1423::AID-POLB12>3.0.CO;2-8 ↗
39. Mooney DA · Langmuir · 23
40. 10.1140/epjb/e2015-60189-y10.1140/epjb/e2015-60189-y ↗
41. He J-H · Therm Sci · 2020 · 65
42. 10.1007/s10704-005-3993-910.1007/s10704-005-3993-9 ↗
43. 10.1366/000370288442845510.1366/0003702884428455 ↗
44. Forster AL. Study of acid generation from copolymer fibers based on 5-amino-2-(p-aminophenyl)-benzimidazole. NISTIR 7592 , 2009.10.6028/NIST.IR.7592 ↗
45. 10.1016/0032-3861(87)90428-910.1016/0032-3861(87)90428-9 ↗
46. 10.1002/polb.1988.09026080310.1002/polb.1988.090260803 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.08210.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.082 ↗
48. 10.1080/0360255080205978210.1080/03602550802059782 ↗
49. 10.1063/1.180891610.1063/1.1808916 ↗