Classifying fabric defects with evolving Inception v3 by improved L 2,1 -norm regularized extreme learning machine
Source abstract
Abstract
To improve efficiency and classification accuracy, and overcome the issue of poor generalization performance of traditional fabric defect classification methods, we present a new fabric defect classification algorithm with evolving Inception v3 by improved L 2,1 -norm regularized extreme learning machine. Herein, first, the features of fabric images are extracted using Inception v3, which reduces the amount of computation and improves the accuracy of feature extraction. Second, an L2,1-norm regularization extreme learning machine algorithm based on multi-verse optimizer–Henry gas solubility optimization, called MHL21-RELM, is proposed. The proposed algorithm solves the problems of the low classification accuracy of the traditional ELM and prevents the algorithm from easily falling into the local optimal solution. Next, instead of SoftMax, MHL21-RELM is used as the classification network layer of Inception V3, and a new fabric defect classification algorithm named Inv3-MHL21-RELM is proposed to enhance the fabric defect classification performance. Finally, the performance of our algorithm is verified by experiments on different fabric defect datasets. The proposed method achieves 97.29% classification accuracy with the Textile Texture Database; it achieves a 6–30% improvement in classification accuracy compared with other traditional fabric defect classification methods, thus effectively improving the classification accuracy of fabric defects. In addition, this method achieves good classification results with different types of fabric defect datasets, thereby showing strong generalization.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Machine Learning and ELM · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Information Science and Technology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, China
Lishui University, China
School of Mechanical Engineering, Hangzhou Dianzi University, China
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.imavis.2011.02.00210.1016/j.imavis.2011.02.002 ↗
2. 10.1109/TIP.2019.295974110.1109/TIP.2019.2959741 ↗
3. 10.1109/SIPROCESS.2018.860041910.1109/SIPROCESS.2018.8600419 ↗
4. 10.1177/0040517521104479410.1177/00405175211044794 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ipm.2020.10243910.1016/j.ipm.2020.102439 ↗
6. 10.1007/s00138-020-01128-810.1007/s00138-020-01128-8 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.inffus.2020.10.00410.1016/j.inffus.2020.10.004 ↗
8. 10.1177/004051752093598410.1177/0040517520935984 ↗
9. 10.1177/004051752092860410.1177/0040517520928604 ↗
10. 10.1177/004051752093957310.1177/0040517520939573 ↗
11. 10.1109/DDCLS.2018.851609410.1109/DDCLS.2018.8516094 ↗
12. Qin YJ, Chen M, Qi LZ, et al. Focus generator with score classification on fabric defect detection. In: Proceedings – International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence , Portland, OR, USA, 4–6 November 2019, pp.1708–1714. USA: IEEE Computer Society. Los Alamitos, CA, USA.10.1109/ICTAI.2019.00252 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.neucom.2019.10.06710.1016/j.neucom.2019.10.067 ↗
14. 10.1177/004051751988412410.1177/0040517519884124 ↗
15. 10.1117/1.OE.56.9.09310410.1117/1.OE.56.9.093104 ↗
16. 10.1007/s11042-018-6786-710.1007/s11042-018-6786-7 ↗
17. 10.1111/coin.1220610.1111/coin.12206 ↗
18. 10.1080/00405000.2013.83368910.1080/00405000.2013.833689 ↗
19. Liu SY, Zhang LD, Wang Q, et al. Bp neural network in classification of fabric defect based on particle swarm optimisation. In: Proceedings of 2008 International Conference on Wavelet Analysis and Pattern Recognition , Hong Kong, China, 30–31August 2008, pp. 216-220. IEEE Computer Society. Piscaatway, NJ, USA.10.1109/ICWAPR.2008.4635779 ↗
20. Eldessouki M · Fibres Text East Eur · 2014 · 22 · 51
21. 10.1177/004051751141010210.1177/0040517511410102 ↗
22. 10.1108/IJCST-12-2019-018810.1108/IJCST-12-2019-0188 ↗
23. 10.1108/IJCST-11-2018-013510.1108/IJCST-11-2018-0135 ↗
24. 10.1109/CBD.2019.0006010.1109/CBD.2019.00060 ↗
25. 10.1587/transinf.2019EDP709210.1587/transinf.2019EDP7092 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compind.2021.10355110.1016/j.compind.2021.103551 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.neucom.2005.12.12610.1016/j.neucom.2005.12.126 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10489-020-01890-210.1007/s10489-020-01890-2 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.future.2019.07.01510.1016/j.future.2019.07.015 ↗
30. 10.1007/s00521-015-1870-710.1007/s00521-015-1870-7 ↗
31. 10.1007/s11042-013-1511-z10.1007/s11042-013-1511-z ↗
32. 10.1007/s11042-021-10996-910.1007/s11042-021-10996-9 ↗
33. 10.1515/mms-2016-001210.1515/mms-2016-0012 ↗
34. TILDA Database for Textile Defect Detection, https://lmb.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/resources/datasets/tilda.en.html (February 2017)
35. Fabirc defect dataset of aliyun tianchi competition, https://github.com/bobo0810/XueLangTianchi
36. 10.1007/s00170-014-6758-710.1007/s00170-014-6758-7 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.11483810.1016/j.eswa.2021.114838 ↗
38. 10.1177/004051752090807210.1177/0040517520908072 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.01.01010.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.01.010 ↗
40. 10.5604/01.3001.0014.779310.5604/01.3001.0014.7793 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.07.00610.1016/j.knosys.2015.07.006 ↗