journal article·2023-02Open access

The role of resources in repair practice: Engagement with self, paid and unpaid clothing repair by young consumers

Rachel H McQueen, Ayesha Jain, Lisa S McNeill, Anika Kozlowski

Textile Research Journal· Volume 93· Issue 3-4

Abstract

As repair can lead to a reduction in clothing consumption and textile waste, repair is essential toward improving the lifetime sustainability of garments and achieving a circular economy. In the literature, common barriers preventing one from conducting garment repairs have been identified. This research re-conceptualizes common repair barriers as repair resources that comprise the skills, tools, priority, and perceived expense that may motivate one toward self-repair, paid and unpaid repair of clothing. A survey of 523 young Canadian consumers (aged 18–34 years) was conducted, in order to examine the impact selected demographic factors and repair resources have on their propensity to carry out different forms of clothing repair. Independent variables were demographic factors and four repair resources, dependent variables were three repair practices. Hierarchical linear regression analyses showed that women were more likely to engage in self-repair, while no gender differences appeared in paid and unpaid repair. Increasing age leads to increased self and paid repair; whereas unpaid repair was more likely to be utilized by the younger consumers. Three repair resources of skills, tools, and priority toward repair strongly predict self-repair. Paid repair is more likely to be utilized if the cost for professional repair services is not perceived to be prohibitive. Young consumers who utilize unpaid repair, while not having the skills, do have access to repair tools and access to skilled resource-rich individuals. The results from this study have implications toward fashion brands, policy and communities in promoting and encouraging various forms of repair practice.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Crafts, Textile, and Design · Fashion and Cultural Textiles · Sustainable Supply Chain Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Human Ecology, University of Alberta, Canada

Department of Marketing, University of Otago, New Zealand

School of Fashion, Toronto Metropolitan University, Canada

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Gwilt A. · Mak Futur
2. 10.3384/cu.2000.1525.13556910.3384/cu.2000.1525.135569 ↗
3. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. A new textiles economy: Redesigning fashion’s future . Cowes, UK. (2017). See https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/publications/A-New-Textiles-Economy_Full-Report_Updated_1-12-17.pdf (accessed 22 August 2022).
4. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12651610.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126516 ↗
5. 10.1111/ijcs.1232810.1111/ijcs.12328 ↗
6. Statistica. Canadian apparel market – statistics & facts . (2022). See https://www.statista.com/topics/5125/apparel-market-in-canada/#dossierKeyfigures (accessed 22 August 2022).
7. City of Vancouver. Report – Zero Waste 2040 . (2018). See https://council.vancouver.ca/20180516/documents/pspc2a.pdf (accessed 22 August 2022).
8. Drennan K, Weber S, Jacob-Vaillancourt C, et al. A feasibility study of textile recycling in Canada . Fashion Takes Action, Toronto, ON. (2021). See https://fashiontakesaction.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/FTA-A-Feasibility-Study-of-Textile-Recycling-in-Canada-EN-June-9-2021.pdf?mc_cid=efc9762732&mc_eid=418828f7e7 (accessed 22 August 2022).
9. Gracey F, Moon D. Valuing our clothes: The evidence base. (2012). See https://docplayer.net/20965846-Valuing-our-clothes-the-evidence-base.html (accessed 5 September 2022).
10. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.10544710.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105447 ↗
11. Middleton J. · 2014 · 262
12. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.00510.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.01410.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.014 ↗
14. Gwilt A, Pal R. Conditional Garment Design for Longevity. PLATE 2017 Conf Proc – 8–10 November , Delft , NL , 2017, pp. 149–153.
15. Williams D, von Busch O. Community repair project: Strategic social skill mobilization for sustainable fashion . University of the Arts, London. (2011). See https://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/id/eprint/3216/1/Community_Repair.pdf (accessed 22 August 2022).
16. 10.3390/su1007221810.3390/su10072218 ↗
17. WRAP. Valuing our clothes: The true cost of how we design, use and dispose of clothing in UK . (2012). See https://wrap.org.uk/resources/report/valuing-our-clothes-true-cost-how-we-design-use-and-dispose-clothing-uk-2012 (accessed 22 August 2022).
18. Fisher T, Cooper T, Woodward S, et al. Public Understanding of Sustainable Clothing. A research report completed for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. London, UK, 2008.
19. 10.1177/004051752094452410.1177/0040517520944524 ↗
20. 10.1111/fcsr.1204710.1111/fcsr.12047 ↗
21. 10.2752/175174108X34692210.2752/175174108X346922 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.09910.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.099 ↗
23. 10.3390/su1119530610.3390/su11195306 ↗
24. McLaren A, McLauchlan S. Crafting sustainable repairs: practice-based approaches to extending the life of clothes. In: Product Lifetimes and the Environment (PLATE) Conference . 17-19 June 2015, Nottingham Trent University, UK, pp. 221–228.
25. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12624510.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126245 ↗
26. 10.3390/su1008289910.3390/su10082899 ↗
27. European Commission. Behavioural study on consumers’ engagement in the circular economy. (2018). See https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/ec_circular_economy_final_report_0.pdf (accessed 5 September 2022).
28. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12534910.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125349 ↗
29. Laitala K · J Des Res · 2012 · 10 · 121
30. 10.1386/crre_00038_110.1386/crre_00038_1 ↗
31. Niinimäki K · 154
32. 10.1080/11745398.2015.111114810.1080/11745398.2015.1111148 ↗
33. 10.1080/10304312.2021.199357210.1080/10304312.2021.1993572 ↗
34. 10.1108/0959055121127493710.1108/09590551211274937 ↗
35. Gwilt A, Leaver J, Fisher M, et al. Understanding the caring practices of users. In: PLATE: Product Lifetimes and the Environment . 17–19 June 2015, Nottingham, UK: Nottingham Trent University, pp. 1–12.
36. 10.1111/ijcs.1259010.1111/ijcs.12590 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12564410.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125644 ↗
38. Nudie Jeans Co. Free repairs forever . 2021. See https://www.nudiejeans.com/free-repairs (accessed 3 August 2021).
39. Whitson Smith JE. What factors could be used to promote environmentally beneficial behaviours within garment use and discard? University of Leeds, Leeds, UK, 2018.
40. Arnould EJ · 2006
41. 10.1108/IJRDM-03-2013-005510.1108/IJRDM-03-2013-0055 ↗
42. 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00756.x10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00756.x ↗
43. Zhang B · Sustainability · 2021 · 13 · 1
44. 10.1111/ijcs.1257210.1111/ijcs.12572 ↗
45. Hair JF · 2006
46. Tian KT · Consum Need Uniqueness Scale Dev Valid · 2010 · 28 · 50
47. 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.04.00810.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.04.008 ↗
48. 10.1108/0959055071073506810.1108/09590550710735068 ↗
49. European Environment Agency. Textiles and the environment: the role of design in Europe’s circular economy . (2022). See https://www.eea.europa.eu/downloads/5976979e8d76486aa2b981cc64028aca/1644481911/textiles-and-the-environment-the.pdf (accessed 22 August 2022).
50. 10.1080/17543266.2022.207295810.1080/17543266.2022.2072958 ↗