Strength of bubble walls and the Hall–Petch effect in bubble-spinning
Source abstract
Abstract
Ashes are used as additives to strengthen bubble walls using the Hall–Petch effect and, as a result, a larger bubble can be produced in the bubble-spinning process, and it can last for a longer period. The fiber morphology can be easily controlled by the amount of ashes added. Two-dimensional nanobelts can be fabricated when the ashes ratio reaches a certain threshold.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Soochow University, China
Funding
Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions · National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/004051751246168510.1177/0040517512461685 ↗
2. Wei L, et al. High-throughput nanofiber produced by needleless electrospinning using a metal dish as the spinneret. Text Res J 2018; 88: 80–88.10.1177/0040517516677232 ↗
3. 10.1177/004051751454999010.1177/0040517514549990 ↗
4. 10.1177/004051751244433410.1177/0040517512444334 ↗
5. 10.2298/TSCI1205263H10.2298/TSCI1205263H ↗
6. 10.2298/TSCI1603967L10.2298/TSCI1603967L ↗
7. Liu P and He JH. Geometric potential: an explanation on of nanofiber's wettability. Therm Sci 2018; 22: 33–38.10.2298/TSCI160706146L ↗
8. 10.2298/TSCI160725075Z10.2298/TSCI160725075Z ↗
9. 10.2298/TSCI1603016Z10.2298/TSCI1603016Z ↗
10. 10.2298/TSCI1603993L10.2298/TSCI1603993L ↗
11. 10.2298/TSCI1205465D10.2298/TSCI1205465D ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.07.03710.1016/j.actamat.2012.07.037 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.02.04410.1016/j.actamat.2017.02.044 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.11.03510.1016/j.msea.2015.11.035 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.10.09410.1016/j.msea.2013.10.094 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.07.02610.1016/j.actamat.2012.07.026 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.09.02010.1016/j.msea.2016.09.020 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.06.06010.1016/j.actamat.2017.06.060 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.08.02310.1016/j.actamat.2014.08.023 ↗
20. 10.1023/A:101536103138410.1023/A:1015361031384 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.01210.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.012 ↗
22. 10.1021/nn400280c10.1021/nn400280c ↗
23. 10.1016/j.chaos.2006.09.02310.1016/j.chaos.2006.09.023 ↗
24. 10.2298/TSCI1205560K10.2298/TSCI1205560K ↗
25. Yu DN, Tian D and He JH, Snail-based nanofibers. Mater Lett . Epub ahead of print 1 June 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.02.076.10.1016/j.matlet.2018.02.076 ↗
26. Ren ZF and Hu GF. He's frequency-amplitude formulation with average residuals for nonlinear oscillators. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control . Epub ahead of print;DOI: org/10.1177/1461348418812327