Effect of hydrolysis time on the morphological, physical, chemical, and thermal behavior of sugar palm nanocrystalline cellulose ( Arenga pinnata (Wurmb.) Merr )
Source abstract
Abstract
Sugar palm nanocrystalline celluloses (SPNCCs) were isolated from sugar palm fiber (SPF). In this study, acid hydrolysis (60 wt. %) at different reaction times (30, 45, and 60 min) was carried out to investigate the optimum yield of NCC. The physical properties, degree of polymerization, chemical composition, structural analysis, crystallinity, surface area and charge, zeta potential, thermal analysis, and morphological characterization were also conducted to determine the outcome (efficiency) of the process. The results showed that a needle-like shape was observed under transmission electron microscopy (TEM) studies. TEM analysis showed optimum aspect ratios of 13.46, 14.44, and 13.13 for isolated SPNCC-I, SPNCC-II, and SPNCC-III, respectively. From thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), the degradation temperature of NCC decreased slightly from 335.15℃ to 278.50℃ as the reaction time increased. A shorter hydrolysis time tended to produce SPNCC with higher thermal stability, as proven in thermal analysis by TGA. The optimal isolation time was found to be around 45 min at 1200 rpm during hydrolysis at 45℃ with 60% sulfuric acid. Therefore, the extracted SPNCC from SPF has huge potential to be utilized in the bionanocomposite field for the production of biopackaging, biomedical products, etc.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Advanced Engineering Materials and Composites Research Centre (AEMC), Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
Laboratory of Biocomposite Technology, Institute of Tropical Forestry and Forest Products (INTROP), Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
AdvancedCentre for Defence Foundation Studies, National Defence University of Malaysia, Kem Sungai Besi, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Research Centre for Chemical Defence, National Defence University of Malaysia, Kem Sungai Besi, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.2174/157341101366617100315562410.2174/1573411013666171003155624 ↗
2. Ilyas RA, Sapuan SM, Norizan MN, et al. Potential of natural fibre composites for transport industry: a review. In: Prosiding seminar Enau Kebangsaan 2019 , Bahau, Negeri Sembilan, 1 April 2019, Paper no 1 : Institute of Tropical Forest and Forest Products (INTROP), Universiti Putra, Malaysia, 2019, pp.2–11.
3. Al-Oqla F and Sapuan MS. Materials selection for natural fiber composites . 1st ed. Duxford, UK: Elsevier Woodhead Publishing, 2017.10.1016/B978-0-08-100958-1.00001-3 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.09.00210.1016/j.carbpol.2018.09.002 ↗
5. 10.1155/2019/525862110.1155/2019/5258621 ↗
6. Hazrol MD · Polimery · 2020 · 55 · 33
7. Sapuan SM and Ilyas RA. Sugar palm: fibers, biopolymers and biocomposites. INTROPica 2017; 15: 5–7.10.1201/9780429443923 ↗
8. Sapuan SM, Ishak MR, Leman Z, et al. Development of products from sugar palm trees (Arenga Pinnata Wurb. Merr): a community project. INTROPica 2017; 13: 12–13.
9. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.03.05110.1016/j.carbpol.2016.03.051 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.02.01210.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.02.012 ↗
11. Ilyas RA · J Adv Res Fluid Mech Therm Sci J · 2018 · 51 · 234
12. Sanyang ML, Ilyas RA, Sapuan SM, et al. Sugar palm starch-based composites for packaging applications. In: Jawaid M and Swain SK (eds) Bionanocomposites for packaging applications . Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.125–147.10.1007/978-3-319-67319-6_7 ↗
13. Ilyas RA, Sapuan SM, Ishak MR, et al. Sugar palm nanocrystalline cellulose reinforced sugar palm starch composite: degradation and water-barrier properties. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Volume 368, The Wood and Biofiber International Conference (WOBIC 2017) , Selangor, Malaysia, 21–23 November 2017, 6, pp.1–12. Epub ahead of print 2018. DOI: 10.1088/1757- 899X/368/1/012006.10.1088/1757-899X/368/1/012006 ↗
14. Ilyas RA, Sapuan SM, Ishak MR, et al. Nanocellulose reinforced starch polymer composites: a review of preparation, properties and application. In: proceedings of the 5th international conference on applied sciences and engineering (ICASEA, 2018) , 7-8 April 2018, pp.325–341. Cameron Highlands, Malaysia: Global Academic Excellence (M) SDN BHD.
15. Jumaidin R · J Adv Res Fluid Mech Therm Sci · 2019 · 62 · 43
16. Jumaidin R · Int J Biol Macromol · 2020 · 14610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.011 ↗
17. Jumaidin R · J Adv Res Fluid Mech Therm Sci · 2019 · 61 · 273
18. Islam MT · Int J Innovat Res Sci Eng Technol · 2013 · 2 · 5444
19. 10.14314/polimery.2019.10.310.14314/polimery.2019.10.3 ↗
20. 10.14314/polimery.2019.9.410.14314/polimery.2019.9.4 ↗
21. 10.14314/polimery.2019.6.510.14314/polimery.2019.6.5 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.03210.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.032 ↗
23. Asyraf MRM · J Mater Res Technol · 2020 · 9
24. 10.1155/2015/95056710.1155/2015/950567 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.12.07810.1016/j.jmrt.2019.12.078 ↗
26. Ilyas RA, Sapuan SM, Ishak MR, et al. Characterization of sugar palm nanocellulose and its potential for reinforcement with a starch-based composite. In: Sapaun SM, Ishak MR, Sanyang ML and Sahari J (eds) Sugar palm biofibers, biopolymers, and biocomposites . 1st ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, CRC Press, 2018, pp.189–220.10.1201/9780429443923-10 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.12410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.124 ↗
28. Sapuan SM, Ilyas RA, Ishak MR, et al. Development of sugar palm–based products: a community project. In: Sapaun SM, Ishak MR, Muhammad Lamin Sanyang and Sahari J (eds) Sugar palm biofibers, biopolymers, and biocomposites . 1st ed. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, CRC Press, 2018, pp.189–220.10.1201/9780429443923-10 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.04210.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.042 ↗
30. 10.1007/s10924-017-1028-z10.1007/s10924-017-1028-z ↗
31. 10.1007/s11837-015-1548-810.1007/s11837-015-1548-8 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0079-6700(98)00018-510.1016/S0079-6700(98)00018-5 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.10.01610.1016/j.jmrt.2019.10.016 ↗
34. 10.2174/15701794160820012010561610.2174/157017941608200120105616 ↗
35. Mazani N, Sapuan SM, Sanyang ML, et al. design and fabrication of a shoe shelf from kenaf fiber reinforced unsaturated polyester composites. In: Ariffin H, Sapuan SM and Mohd Ali Hassan (eds) Lignocellulose for future bioeconomy. Oxford, United Kingdom, Elsevier, 2019, pp.315–332.10.1016/B978-0-12-816354-2.00017-7 ↗
36. Abral H · Polym Test · 2019
37. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.05.04010.1016/j.carbpol.2007.05.040 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.02.04410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.02.044 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.04510.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.045 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.06210.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.062 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.16510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.165 ↗
42. 10.1007/s12221-018-7953-110.1007/s12221-018-7953-1 ↗
43. 10.1002/star.20170028710.1002/star.201700287 ↗
44. Ilyas RA, Sapuan SM, Ishak MR, et al. Water barrier properties of biodegradable films reinforced with nanocellulose for food packaging application: a review. In: Sapuan SM, Noor Azammi AM, Ilyas RA (eds) 6 th postgraduate seminar on natural fiber reinforced polymer composites 2018 , Institute of Tropical Forestry and Forest Products (INTROP), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, 4 December 2018, pp.55–59.
45. 10.1007/s10570-005-9039-710.1007/s10570-005-9039-7 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.03010.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.030 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.10526610.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105266 ↗
48. 10.1021/am100622210.1021/am1006222 ↗
49. Ilyas RA, Sapuan SM, Ibrahim R, et al. Production, processes and modification of nanocrystalline cellulose from agro-waste: a review. In: Movahedi B (ed.) Nanocrystalline materials. London, UK: IntechOpen, pp.3–32.
50. Naduparambath S, TVJ, Shaniba V, et al. Isolation and characterisation of cellulose nanocrystals from sago seed shells. Carbohydr Polym 2018; 180: 13–20.10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.09.088 ↗
51. 10.32964/TJ10.4.910.32964/TJ10.4.9 ↗
52. 10.1002/pc.2537910.1002/pc.25379 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.08.02810.1016/j.jmrt.2019.08.028 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.09.03910.1016/j.indcrop.2017.09.039 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.06.04110.1016/j.indcrop.2012.06.041 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.05.04410.1016/j.compscitech.2007.05.044 ↗
57. 10.15376/biores.9.3.4608-462110.15376/biores.9.3.4608-4621 ↗
58. 10.1177/002199831557723310.1177/0021998315577233 ↗
59. Norizan MN · Polimery · 2020 · 65 · 34
60. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.11.08610.1016/j.jmrt.2019.11.086 ↗
61. 10.15376/biores.11.2.4134-414510.15376/biores.11.2.4134-4145 ↗
62. 10.15376/biores.12.4.8734-875410.15376/biores.12.4.8734-8754 ↗
63. Wise LE · Paper Trade J · 1946 · 122 · 35
64. 10.1177/00405175590290100310.1177/004051755902901003 ↗
65. 10.4236/abb.2013.41214610.4236/abb.2013.412146 ↗
66. Yasim-Anuar TAT · Bioresources · 2017 · 12 · 715
67. 10.1016/j.mattod.2013.06.00410.1016/j.mattod.2013.06.004 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.02910.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.029 ↗
69. 10.3389/fchem.2020.0021310.3389/fchem.2020.00213 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.04.01110.1016/j.jmrt.2019.04.011 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.01.05910.1016/j.carbpol.2010.01.059 ↗
72. Phanthong P · Carbon Res Convers · 2018 · 1
73. Chan CH · BioResources · 2013 · 8 · 785
74. 10.15376/biores.11.2.3397-341510.15376/biores.11.2.3397-3415 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.02.04710.1016/j.matlet.2015.02.047 ↗
76. 10.14314/polimery.2019.10.510.14314/polimery.2019.10.5 ↗
77. 10.1002/app.118410.1002/app.1184 ↗
78. 10.1002/(SICI)1439-2054(20000301)276:1<1::AID-MAME1>3.0.CO;2-W10.1002/(SICI)1439-2054(20000301)276:1<1::AID-MAME1>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
79. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.02210.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.022 ↗
80. 10.1002/app.2491210.1002/app.24912 ↗
81. 10.1007/s10570-010-9453-310.1007/s10570-010-9453-3 ↗
82. 10.1177/004051750933763310.1177/0040517509337633 ↗
83. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.471-472.81510.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.471-472.815 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.02910.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.029 ↗
85. 10.1039/b810371b10.1039/b810371b ↗
86. 10.1007/s10570-007-9179-z10.1007/s10570-007-9179-z ↗
87. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.08.00910.1016/j.indcrop.2010.08.009 ↗
88. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.01.00810.1016/j.compositesb.2015.01.008 ↗
89. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.03.06510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.03.065 ↗
90. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.06810.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.068 ↗
91. 10.1002/anie.20046058710.1002/anie.200460587 ↗
92. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.08.09010.1016/j.carbpol.2016.08.090 ↗
93. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.03.04610.1016/j.carbpol.2010.03.046 ↗
94. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.03.00410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.03.004 ↗
95. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.03.00610.1016/j.indcrop.2014.03.006 ↗
96. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.02.02110.1016/j.carbpol.2017.02.021 ↗
97. 10.1166/jbmb.2020.195110.1166/jbmb.2020.1951 ↗
98. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.03010.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.030 ↗
99. Wahono S · ARPN J Eng Appl Sci · 2018 · 13 · 746
100. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.08.13410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.08.134 ↗