journal article·2026-05-31

Aging and degradation of oil and grease barrier papers coated with bio-based starch–wax emulsion

Erfan Salehi Sichani, Emanuele Martorana, Johannes Kritzinger, Thoralf Gliese, Jurgen Belle

TAPPI Journal· Volume 25· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

The long-term performance and stability of bio-based barrier coatings are critical for sustainable packaging. In this study, the aging and degradation of a biobased starch•wax emulsion coating were examined on two different base papers. Coated samples were stored for 8 months at 23°C and 50% relative humidity (RH) in their original reels to minimize external exposure and isolate internal aging effects. Multiple aging intervals were analyzed using advanced methods to assess both chemical composition and physical structure. The water vapor transmission rate (WVTR) of both coated papers increased during the first 15 days, but after eight months, the WVTR dropped below the initial values. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) results supported these trends by showing a marked rise in the polarity index (PI), occurring predominantly within the first 15 days. The overall observations, including increases in the PI, carbonyl index (CI), and absolute absorbance in the hydroxyl region, confirm that both hydrolysis and oxidation occurred during aging. The gradual increase in the aliphatic C•H stretching peaks indicated that wax components moved toward the surface over time. The non-uniform surface enrichment of oleophilic wax following migration contributed to the decline in Kit rating upon aging by facilitating oil and grease wetting and penetration. At the same time, increased wax concentration at the surface helped improve the water vapor barrier performance during long-term aging. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging revealed distinct surface cracks over time on the starch-wax emulsion coated papers. The FTIR analysis supported these observations through an increase in the conformational disorder index (CDI) with aging. Physical changes were further reflected in the barrier performance, as the heptane vapor transmission rate (HVTR) increased significantly for both coated papers over the 8-month period.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Material Properties and Processing · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Munich University of Applied Sciences

Omya (Switzerland)

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. 1. Marianelli, A., Einsla, B., Snow, E., et al., TAPPI J. 21(11): 645(2022). https://doi.org/10.32964/TJ21.11.645. DOI: 10.32964/TJ21.11.64510.32964/TJ21.11.645 ↗
2. 2. Bugg, G.G., Glittenberg, D., Kearney, R.L., et al., in Starch and Starch Products in Surface Sizing and Paper Coating (H.W. Maurer and D. Glittenberg, Eds.), TAPPI Press, Atlanta, 2001.
3. 3. Liu, D., Duan, Y., Wang, S., et al., Polymers 14(9): 1786(2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14091786. DOI: 10.3390/polym1409178610.3390/polym14091786 ↗
4. 4. Rastogi, V.K. and Samyn, P., Coatings 5(4): 887(2015). https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings5040887. DOI: 10.3390/coatings504088710.3390/coatings5040887 ↗
5. 5. Araújo, M.A., Cunha, A.M., and Mota, M., Biomaterials 25(13): 2687(2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.093. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.09310.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.093 ↗
6. 6. Kritzinger, J., Bauer, W., Hunziker, P., et al., “Quantification of the penetration of coating pigments into the base paper determined by automated serial sectioning,” TAPPI PaperCon, TAPPI Press, Atlanta, 2011.
7. 7. Pawase, P.A., Pathare, A.M., Bashir, O., et al., Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 10: 100986(2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carpta.2025.100986. DOI: 10.1016/j.carpta.2025.10098610.1016/j.carpta.2025.100986 ↗
8. 8. Sinhmar, A., Pathera, A., Sharma, S., et al., Starch 75(1–2): 2200117(2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/star.202200117. DOI: 10.1002/star.20220011710.1002/star.202200117 ↗
9. 9. Menzel, C., Andersson, M., Andersson, R., et al., Carbohydr. Polym.130: 388(2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.05.024. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.05.02410.1088/1475-7516/2015/05/024 ↗
10. 10. Hafila, K.Z., Jumaidin, R., Ilyas, R.A., et al., Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 194: 851(2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.11.139. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.11.13910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.11.139 ↗
11. 11. Santos, A. de A., Matos, L.C., Mendonça, M.C., et al., Ind. Crops Prod. 203: 117177(2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.117177. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.11717710.1016/j.indcrop.2023.117177 ↗
12. 12. Sun, S., Ji, Y., McClements, D.J., et al., Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 307: 142288(2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.142288. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.14228810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.142288 ↗
13. 13. Pignères, E., Gaucel, S., Coffigniez, F., et al., Prog. Org. Coat. 195: 108627(2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2024.108627. DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2024.10862710.1016/j.porgcoat.2024.108627 ↗
14. 14. Ceretti, D.V.A., Edeleva, M., Cardon, L., et al., Molecules 28(5): 2344(2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28052344. DOI: 10.3390/molecules2805234410.3390/molecules28052344 ↗
15. 15. Xiofan, H., J. Polym. Sci. Appl. 7(2): (2023).
16. 16. Vrabicˇ-Brodnjak, U., Yavorov, N., Lasheva, V., et al., Coatings 13(5): 828(2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13050828. DOI: 10.3390/coatings1305082810.3390/coatings13050828 ↗
17. 17. Jahangiri, F., Mohanty, A.K., and Misra, M., Green Chem. 26(12): 4934(2024). https://doi.org/10.1039/d3gc02647g. DOI: 10.1039/D3GC02647G10.1039/D3GC02647G ↗
18. 18. Chae, Y.J. and Lee, T.G., Sci. Rep. 15: 25776(2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-10782-9. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-10782-910.1038/s41598-025-10782-9 ↗
19. 19. Sukumaran, S., “What makes FTIR spectroscopy a game-changer in polymer research?”, AZoM.com Ltd., Syndey, NSW, Australia. Available [Online]: https://www.azom.com/article. aspx?ArticleID=24127 <04May2026>.
20. 20. Altay, B.N., Aksoy, B., Huq, A., et al., Sci. Rep. 13: 19350(2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46130-y. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-46130-y10.1038/s41598-023-46130-y ↗
21. 21. “Paper coating – an overview,” ScienceDirect Topics (Chemical Engineering), Elsevier, Amsterdam. Available [Online] https://www. sciencedirect.com/topics/chemical-engineering/paper-coating <04May2026>.
22. 22. “Properties of paper,” PaperOnWeb.com. Available [Online] https://www.paperonweb.com/paperpro.htm <04May2026>.
23. 23. Owens, D.K. and Wendt, R.C., J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 13(8): 1741(1969). https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1969.070130815. DOI: 10.1002/app.1969.07013081510.1002/app.1969.070130815 ↗
24. 24. Bruijnes, C., Bosman, R., Bareman, P., et al., “Conformational analysis of starch derivatives by FTIR spectroscopy,” Proc. SPIE, Vol. 1145: Fourier Transform Spectroscopy, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, Bellingham, WA, USA, 1989, p. 342. DOI: 10.1117/12.96951710.1117/12.969491 ↗