journal article·2026-05-31

Exploratory study on how sub-ply fiber orientation affects the cracking behavior of wax-based barrier coatings

G. Marin, A. Hagman, A. - K. Ericksson, E. Persson, C. Rydefalk, P. Srinivasa

TAPPI Journal· Volume 25· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

The transition to 100% biobased packaging presents considerable challenges, particularly in the development of a petroleum-free barrier. Generally, biobased barriers exhibit lower flexibility compared to traditional barriers, thereby increasing the risk of cracking during the converting process. The present study examines the possibility of optimizing the substrate to reduce cracking in brittle barriers. Five three-ply composites were fabricated using commercial paperboard to enable a composite with different fiber orientation in the individual plies. The different orientations achieved varying mechanical properties, including strain-atbreak and folding resistance, with a ranking that is comparable to a standard multi-ply paperboard. The composites were subjected to creasing at five distinct depths to assess the area percent of barrier cracks across the crease bead. Micro-cracks appeared on the surface before larger coating cracks were registered. As expected, the area percent of barrier cracks increased significantly with greater creasing depths. The orientation of the bulky middle ply showed little difference in the cracking propensity. However, by replacing the stiffer bottom ply with a ply of lower stiffness, the cracking propensity was significantly reduced without a substantial loss in mechanical properties. Hence, these findings indicate that it is possible to reduce the cracks in the barrier by modifying the fiber orientation in the different plies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Material Properties and Processing · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

RISE Research Institutes of Sweden

References (12)

Show source-provided references
1. 1. Lev, R., Lyytikäinen, J., Matthews, S., et al., Packag. Technol. Sci. 37(11): 1037(2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2845. DOI: 10.1002/pts.284510.1002/pts.2845 ↗
2. 2. Lev, R., Tanninen, P., Lyytikäinen, J., et al., BioResources 18(4): 8707(2023). https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.18.4.Lev. DOI: 10.15376/biores.18.4.Lev10.15376/biores.18.4.Lev ↗
3. 3. Tanninen, P., Saukkonen, E., Leminen, V., et al., Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 30(2): 336(2015). https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2015-30-02-p336-343. DOI: 10.3183/npprj-2015-30-02-p336-34310.3183/npprj-2015-30-02-p336-343 ↗
4. 4. Javed, A., Rättö, P., Järnström, L., et al., Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 33(2): 336(2018). https://doi.org/10.1515/npprj-2018-3039. DOI: 10.1515/npprj-2018-303910.1515/npprj-2018-3039 ↗
5. 5. Panek, J., Smith, S.D., and Coffin, D.W., TAPPI J. 19(4): 219(2020). https://doi.org/10.32964/TJ19.4.219. DOI: 10.32964/TJ19.4.21910.32964/TJ19.4.219 ↗
6. 6. Rättö, P., Hornatowska, J., and Barbier, C., Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 27(4): 714(2012). https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2012-27-04-p714-720. DOI: 10.3183/npprj-2012-27-04-p714-72010.3183/npprj-2012-27-04-p714-720 ↗
7. 7. Bota, J., Pibernik, J., Kovacˇevic’, D., et al., “The effects of flatbed creasing tool on printed paperboard,” Proc., 11th Int. Symp. GRID, University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Department of Graphic Engineering and Design, Novi Sad, Serbia, 2022, p. 657. https://doi.org/10.24867/GRID-2022-p71. DOI: 10.24867/GRID-2022-p7110.24867/GRID-2022-p71 ↗
8. 8. Pál, M., Dedijer, S., László, K., et al., Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 36(4): 626(2021). https://doi.org/10.1515/npprj-2021-0041. DOI: 10.1515/npprj-2021-004110.1515/npprj-2021-0041 ↗
9. 9. Nygårds, M., Bhattacharya, A., and Krishnan, S.V.R., Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 29(3): 510(2014). https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2014-29-03-p510-520. DOI: 10.3183/npprj-2014-29-03-p510-52010.3183/npprj-2014-29-03-p510-520 ↗
10. 10. Thorman, S., Ström, G., Hagberg, A., et al., Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 27(2): 459(2012). https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2012-27-02-p459-465. DOI: 10.3183/npprj-2012-27-02-p459-46510.3183/npprj-2012-27-02-p459-465 ↗
11. 11. Saffman, P.G. and Taylor, G., Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 245(1242): 312(1958). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1958.0085. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1958.008510.1098/rspa.1958.0085 ↗
12. 12. Brumm, P., Sauer, H.M., and Dörsam, E., Colloids Interfaces 3(1): 37(2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids3010037. DOI: 10.3390/colloids301003710.3390/colloids3010037 ↗