Beyond the machine: Decoding process water microbes behind odor in papermaking
Source abstract
Abstract
Paper manufacturing processes create an ecosystem conducive to microbial growth, characterized by abundant water, nutrients, and optimal temperatures, fostering diverse microbial habitats. With the increased use of recycled fibers and greater water system closure, the industry now faces amplified microbiological challenges, particularly odor generation. These odor problems have raised community concerns, as shown by resident complaints, and have led to significant economic impacts, including costly lawsuits against major paper manufacturers. Based on earlier studies showing that microbes in papermaking systems can generate odor-causing volatile compounds, this study is guided by the hypothesis that recycle paper mill process water harbors odor-causing microbial communities and thus represents a primary source of malodor. To test this hypothesis, process water samples from commercial recycle paper mills were analyzed using high-throughput Illumina sequencing to characterize microbial communities in one complete analysis. The study results revealed fifteen major microbial populations, dominated mainly by the genus Pseudomonas. The identified microbes were further linked to prior literature to determine their functional roles in odor generation, including the production of haloanisoles (2-monochloroanisole, 2,4-dichloroanisole, 2,3,6-trichloroanisole, 2,4,6-tri-bromoanisole), geosmin, 2-methylisoborneol, and volatile organic sulfur compounds such as dimethyl polysulfides, hydrogen sulfide, and methyl mercaptan. This study introduces a microbiological community-profiling approach that enables papermakers to assess whether process water represents a potential source of malodor. Earlier studies have not examined microbial communities in recycle paper mill process water specifically from the perspective of identifying malodor sources, nor have they integrated such findings with an extensive literature-based assessment. The findings of this study advance both science and practice by offering a method that can serve as an early diagnostic tool for papermakers, supporting effective future odor management and deepening understanding of microbial ecology in paper mill environments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Odor and Emission Control Technologies · Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure · Water Treatment and Disinfection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Western Michigan University
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 1. Bajpai, P., Pulp and Paper Industry: Microbiological Issues in Papermaking, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2015.10.1016/B978-0-12-803408-8.00002-0 ↗
2. 2. Phan, T.H.T., Dang, T.N., Tran, T.H., et al., Microbiology 94:254(2025). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026261724606262.10.1134/S0026261724606262 ↗
3. 3. Granhall, U., Welsh, A., Throbäck, I.N., et al., J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 37(10): 1061-1069(2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-010-0754-1.10.1007/s10295-010-0754-1 ↗
4. 4. Oikkonen, H., “Designing and testing a qPCR method for a group of harmful bacteria in the paper industry,” Master’s thesis, University of Helsinki, Finland, 2022.
5. 5. Zumsteg, A., Urwyler, S.K., and Glaubitz, J., MicrobiologyOpen 6(4): e00487(2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.487.10.1002/mbo3.487 ↗
6. 6. Shi, L., Shi, G., ZhuGe, R., et al., J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 3(3): 128(2018). http://jbb.xml-journal.net/en/article/doi/10.21967/jbb.v3i3.176.
7. 7. Kaur, A., Gautam, L.K., Balda, S., et al., Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 173: 105455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2022.105455.10.1016/j.ibiod.2022.105455 ↗
8. 8. De Celis, M., Belda, I., Ortiz-Álvarez, R., et al., Sci. Rep. 10:4079(2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61092-1.10.1038/s41598-020-61092-1 ↗
9. 9. Gaetano, A.S., Semeraro, S., Greco, S., et al., Microorganisms 12: 965(2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12050965.10.3390/microorganisms12050965 ↗
10. 10. Ali, A.A.A., Naddeo, V., Hasan, S.W., et al., J. Water Process Eng. 37: 101472(2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101472.10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101472 ↗
11. 11. Staley, C., Unno, T., Gould, T.J., et al., J. Appl. Microbiol. 115: 1147(2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12323.10.1111/jam.12323 ↗
12. 12. Baum, C., “New approaches and concepts to study complex microbial communities,“ Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris-Saclay, New England Biolabs, France, 2021. Available [Online] https://theses.hal.science/tel-03531325/. <26Feb2026>.
13. 13. Kashama, J., Prince, V., Simao-Beaunoir, AM., et al., J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 36(3): 391(2009).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-008-0509-4.10.1007/s10295-008-0509-4 ↗
14. 14. Prince, V., Simao-Beaunoir, A.-M., and Beaulieu, C., Can. J. Microbiol. 55: 810(2009). https://doi.org/10.1139/W09-036.10.1139/W09-036 ↗
15. 15. Desjardins, E. and Beaulieu, C., J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 30(3): 141(2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-002-0017-x.10.1007/s10295-002-0017-x ↗
16. 16. Wu, S., Zhou, R., Ma, Y., et al., Biotechnol. Biofuels 14: 242(2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-021-02089-4.10.1186/s13068-021-02089-4 ↗
17. 17. Zhang, K., Cao, C., Zhou, X., et al., Water Res. 131: 11(2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.013.10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.013 ↗
18. 18. Lu, X., Fan, C., He, W., et al., J. Environ. Sci. 25(1): 33(2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60019-9.10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60019-9 ↗
19. 19. Oppong, D., King, V.M., and Bowen, J.A., Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 52(2): 53(2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-8305(02)00174-9.10.1016/S0964-8305(02)00174-9 ↗
20. 20. Pal, M.K. and Lavanya, M., J. Bio-Tribo-Corros. 8: 76(2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s40735-022-00677-x.10.1007/s40735-022-00677-x ↗
21. 21. Li, L., “Understanding the impacts of organic matter on microbial biofilms in engineered drinking water systems,” Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA, 2020.
22. 22. Pullerits, K., Ahlinder, J., Holmer, L., et al., npj Clean Water. 3:11(2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-020-0057-7.10.1038/s41545-020-0057-7 ↗
23. 23. Jeon, Y., Li, L., Calvillo, J., et al., Water Res. 184: 116120(2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116120.10.1016/j.watres.2020.116120 ↗
24. 24. Allegue, T., Arias, A., Liñares, A., et al., Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol. 9: 2733(2023). https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EW00404J.10.1039/D3EW00404J ↗
25. 25. Xie, Z., Lin, W., and Luo, J., BioMed Res. Int. 6304248(2017). https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6304248.10.1155/2017/6304248 ↗
26. 26. Canto-Canché, B., Carreón-Anguiano, K.G., Barahona-Cortés, R., et al., “Use of agroindustrial biomass for biofuel and enzyme discovery and production,“ in Agricultural, Forestry and Bioindustry Biotechnology and Biodiscovery (P. Chong, D. Newman, and D. Steinmacher, Eds.), Springer Cham, 2020, pp. 271-318. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51358-0_15.10.1007/978-3-030-51358-0_15 ↗
27. 27. Verhoef, R.P., “Structural characterisation and enzymatic degrada-tion of exopolysaccharides involved in paper mill slime deposition,” Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands, 2005.
28. 28. Pathak, P., Kumar, V., Bhardwaj, N.K., et al., Phys. Sci. Rev. 6:149(2021). https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2019-0049.10.1515/psr-2019-0049 ↗
29. 29. Song, C., Shi, Y., Gao, H., et al., Fermentation 9: 592(2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9070592.10.3390/fermentation9070592 ↗
30. 30. Espín, Y., Menchén, A., Moreno, J.L., et al., Appl. Sci. 11(14):6309(2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11146309.10.3390/app11146309 ↗
31. 31. Vijayan, J., Nathan, V.K., Ammini, P., et al., Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30: 28383(2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25195-2.10.1007/s11356-023-25195-2 ↗
32. 32. Lührig, K., Canbäck, B., Paul, C.J., et al., Microbes Environ. 30(1): 99(2015). https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME14123.10.1264/jsme2.ME14123 ↗
33. 33. Khu, S.-T., Xin, C., Wang, T., et al., J. Water Process. Eng. 53: 103882(2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103882.10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103882 ↗
34. 34. Yao, Y., Liu, H., Han, R., et al., Water 13: 524(2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/w13040524.10.3390/w13040524 ↗
35. 35. Martiny, A.C., Albrechtsen, H.-J., Arvin, E., et al., Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 8611(2005). https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.12.8611-8617.2005.10.1128/AEM.71.12.8611-8617.2005 ↗
36. 36. Ding, W., Wang, S., Qin, P., et al., Nat. Commun. 14: 2033(2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37759-4.10.1038/s41467-023-37759-4 ↗
37. 37. Shi, J., Zhang, B., Tang, Y., et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 471:134342(2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134342.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134342 ↗
38. 38. Clercin, N.A., Druschel, G.K., and Gray, M.J., Environ. Manag. 297: 113304(2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113304.10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113304 ↗
39. 39. Luo, F., Chen, H., Wu, X., et al., Toxics 10(8): 485(2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10080485.10.3390/toxics10080485 ↗
40. 40. Chernogor, L., Bakhvalova, K., Belikova, A., et al., Microorganisms 10: 1071(2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10051071.10.3390/microorganisms10051071 ↗
41. 41. Fu, F., Huang, S., Yuan, J., et al., Ecol. Eng. 171: 106353(2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106353.10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106353 ↗
42. 42. Testa, B. and Clement, B., “Biotransformation reactions and their enzymes,” in The Practice of Medicinal Chemistry (C.J. Wermuth,
43. D. Aldous, P. Raboisson, et al., Eds.), 4th edn., Academic Press (Elsevier), Oxford, 2015, Chap. 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-417205-0.00024-9.10.1016/B978-0-12-417205-0.00024-9 ↗
44. 43. Zhou, X., Zhang, K., Cen, C., et al., Sci. Total Environ. 776:146054(2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146054.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146054 ↗
45. 44. Zhou, X., Zhang, K., Zhang, T., et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 403: 123693(2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123693.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123693 ↗
46. 45. Careri, M., Mazzoleni, V., Musci, M., et al., Chromatographia 53: 553(2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02491621.10.1007/BF02491621 ↗
47. 46. Lorentzen, J.C., Juran, S.A., Nilsson, M., et al., Indoor Air 26: 207(2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12207.10.1111/ina.12207 ↗
48. 47. Zhang, K., Zhou, X., Zhang, T., et al., Chemosphere 163: 366(2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.08.051.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.08.051 ↗
49. 48. Pochiraju, S.S., Hoppe-Jones, C., Adams, C., et al., Water Res. X 11: 100099(2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2021.100099.10.1016/j.wroa.2021.100099 ↗
50. 49. Suffet, I.H., Mallevialle, J., and Kawczynski, E. (Eds.), Advances in Taste-and-Odor Treatment and Control, American Water Works Association (AWWA), Denver, CO, US, 1995.