Determination of aliphatic and phenolic hydroxyl groups in lignin by chemometric analysis of FTIR spectroscopic data
Source abstract
Abstract
Lignin’s potential as a source of sustainable aromatic compounds is significant, but its utilization is currently limited by its chemical reactivity. Chemical reactivity of lignin depends on the present functional groups, such as hydroxyl, methoxy, and carbonyl groups. Therefore, in this study, multivariate analysis-based chemometric models have been developed for rapid determination of aliphatic hydroxyl (Alp-OH) and phenolic hydroxyl (Ph-OH) groups in lignin samples. Two chemometric models, principal component regression (PCR) and partial least squares regression (PLSR), were established with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectral data of 28 lignin samples. Both the models were developed based on raw and pretreated spectroscopic data with Savitky-Golay (S-G) filtering and standard normal variate (SNV) and multiplicative scatter correction (MSC). The predictive performance of the PLSR model is better for predicting Alp-OH (R2 = 0.94%), syringyl-OH (R2 = 0.96%), guaiacyl-OH (R2 = 0.98%), p-hydroxyphenyl (R2 = 0.93%), and total Ph-OH groups (R2 = 0.97%) with the data pretreated by MSC. Finally, the predicted results of these parameters for three new samples for the developed models are found to be very close to the estimated values by NMR.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Lignin and Wood Chemistry · Enzyme-mediated dye degradation · Biochemical and biochemical processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Rowell, R.M., Handbook of Wood Chemistry and Wood Composites, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203492437.10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.08.048 ↗
2. Akpan, E.I., “Chemistry and structure of lignin,” in Sustainable Lignin for Carbon Fibers: Principles, Techniques, and Applications (E.I. Akpan and S.O. Adeosun, Eds.), Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18792-7_1.10.1007/978-3-030-18792-7 ↗
3. Li, T. and Takkellapati, S., Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin. 12(5): 756(2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1913.10.1002/bbb.1913 ↗
4. Eraghi Kazzaz, A. and Fatehi, P., Ind. Crops Prod. 154: 112732(2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112732.10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112732 ↗
5. Matsushita, Y., J. Wood. Sci. 61: 230(2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-015-1470-2.10.1007/s10086-015-1470-2 ↗
6. Gosselink, R.J.A., Van Dam, J.E.G., De Jong, E., et al., Holzforschung 64(2): 193(2010). https://doi.org/10.1515/hf.2010.023.10.1515/hf.2010.023 ↗
7. Hany, L.J.S., Rahman, M.M., Popy, R.S., et al., Eur. J. Wood Prod. 82: 1357(2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-024-02094-y.10.1007/s00107-024-02094-y ↗
8. Rahman, M.M., Jahan, E., Jahan, M.S., et al., Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 14: 30515(2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04901-7.10.1007/s13399-023-04901-7 ↗
9. Sutradhar, S., Arafat, K.M.Y., Nayeem, J., et al., Cellul. Chem. Technol. 54(5-6): 463(2020). https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2020.54.47.10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2020.54.47 ↗
10. Duan, X., Wang, X., Chen, J., et al., RSC Adv. 12: 24242(2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RA02085H.10.1039/D2RA02085H ↗
11. Tagami, A., Gioia, C., Lauberts, M., et al., Ind. Crops. Prod. 129: 123(2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.11.067.10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.11.067 ↗
12. Zakis, G.F., Functional Analysis of Lignins and Their Derivatives (T. Joyce and R. Brezny, Trans. Eds.), Trans. edn., TAPPI Press, Atlanta, 1994, p.102.
13. Argyropoulos, D., J. Wood Chem. Technol. 14(1): 65(1994). https://doi.org/10.1080/02773819408003086.10.1080/02773819408003086 ↗
14. Meng, X., Crestini, C., Ben, H., et al., Nat. Protoc. 14: 2627(2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-019-0191-1.10.1038/s41596-019-0191-1 ↗
15. Stücker, A., Podschun, J., Saake, B., et al., Anal. Methods 10: 3481(2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8AY01272E.10.1039/C8AY01272E ↗
16. Uddin, M.N., Rahman, M.M., Likhon, M.N.A., et al., Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 40(1): 71(2025). https://doi.org/10.1515/npprj-2024-0060.10.1515/npprj-2024-0060 ↗
17. Uddin, M.N., Ahmed, S., Ray, S.K., et al., Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 34(1): 1(2019). https://doi.org/10.1515/npprj-2018-0018.10.1515/npprj-2018-0018 ↗
18. Uddin, M.N., Ferdous, T., Islam, Z., et al., J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 5(3): 196(2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobab.2020.07.005.10.1016/j.jobab.2020.07.005 ↗
19. Uddin, M.N., Nayeem, J., Islam, M.S., et al., Biomass Conver. Biorefin. 9: 585(2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00383-8.10.1007/s13399-019-00383-8 ↗
20. Saariaho, A.-M., Jääskeläinen, A.-S., Nuopponen, M., et al., Appl. Spectrosc. 57(1): 58(2003). https://doi.org/10.1366/000370203321165214.10.1366/000370203321165214 ↗
21. Hoang, V., Bhardwaj, N.K., and Nguyen, K.L., Carbohydr. Polym. 61(1): 5(2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.12.007.10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.12.007 ↗
22. Monrroy, M., Mendonça, R., Baeza, J., et al., J. Near Infrared Spectrosc. 16(2) :121(2008). https://doi.org/10.1255/jnirs.766.10.1255/jnirs.766 ↗
23. Chai, X.S., Zhu, J.Y., and Li, J., J. Pulp. Pap. Sci. 27: 165(2001).
24. Uddin, M.N., Ferdous, T., Likhon, M.N.A., et al., J. Appl. Polym. Sci. e57698(2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/app.57698.10.1002/app.57698 ↗
25. Uddin, M.N., Ferdous, T., Jin, Y., et al., Anal. Sci. Adv. 6(1): e70005(2025). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ansa.70005.10.1002/ansa.70005 ↗
26. “Solvent extractives of wood and pulp,” TAPPI Standard Test Method T 204 cm-17, TAPPI Press, Atlanta, 2017.
27. Jiang, B., Zhang, Y., Guo, T., et al., Polymers 10(7): 736(2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10070736.10.3390/polym10070736 ↗
28. Brereton, R.G., Chemometrics: Data Analysis for the Laboratory and Chemical Plant, John Wiley & Sons, 2003.10.1002/0470863242 ↗
29. Massart, D.L., Vandeginste, B.G.M., Deming, S.N., et al., Chemometrics: A Textbook, Data Handling in Science and Technology Series, Elsevier, Vol. 2, 1988.
30. Einax, J.W., Brown, S.D., Tauler, R., et al., (Eds.), "Comprehensive chemometrics. Chemical and biochemical data analysis," Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 396:551(2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-3284-9.10.1007/s00216-009-3284-9 ↗
31. Windig, W., Shaver, J., and Bro, R., Appl. Spectrosc. 62(10):1153(2008). https://doi.org/10.1366/000370208786049097.10.1366/000370208786049097 ↗
32. Maleki, M.R., Mouazen, A.M., Ramon, H., et al., Biosyst. Eng. 96(3): 427(2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.11.014.10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.11.014 ↗
33. Jolliffe, I.T., “Principal component analysis for special types of data,” in Principal Component Analysis, Springer Series in Statistics, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002, pp. 338-372.10.1007/0-387-22440-8_13 ↗
34. Colares, C.J.G., Pastore, T.C.M., Coradin, V.T.R., et al., J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 26: 1297(2015). https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-5053.20150096.10.5935/0103-5053.20150096 ↗
35. He, W. and Hu, H., J. Wood Chem. Technol. 33(1): 52(2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/02773813.2012.731463.10.1080/02773813.2012.731463 ↗
36. Li, X., Sun, C., Zhou, B., et al., Sci. Rep. 5: 17210(2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17210.10.1038/srep17210 ↗
37. Luo, Q. and Zhu, J., J. Sci. Technol. For. Prod. Processes 5: 6(2015).
38. Shukla, S.R., Shashikala, S., and Sujatha, M., J. Near Infrared Spectrosc. 29(3): 168(2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/0967033521999118.10.1177/0967033521999118 ↗
39. Uddin, M.N., Ray, S.K., Islam, M.S., et al., J. Sci. Technol. For. Prod. Processes 6: 22(2017).