Optimizing OCC refining with defloccing
Source abstract
Abstract
Subjecting pulp to a high shear zone immediately after refining results in more efficient refining. This phenomenon was originally observed to benefit softwood pulp refining. It was attributed to floc reduction based on floc measurements in mill refiners and the observation of reduced headbox plugging. Hence, this phenomenon has been termed “defloccing.” The present work shows this technology also benefits refining of North American old corrugated containers (OCC). The combined results of several mill trials with OCC defloccing demonstrate the interactions between OCC refining intensity, defloccing technology, and other state-of-the-art refining improvements. At the same refining intensity, defloccing OCC on 100% recycled machines increases OCC refining efficiency by 15%, with greater efficiency improvement on machines that use softwood as well as OCC. Furthermore, it is shown that the benefits of defloccing are additive to refining improvements made in the refining zone of a refiner plate. Most OCC refiner plate designs can therefore benefit from the addition of a defloccing feature.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Waterhouse, J.F., Tappi J. 76(9): 129(1992).
2. van de Ven, T.G.M., Annu. Trans. - Nord. Rheol. Soc. 14: 9(2006).
3. Lumiainen, J.J., in Papermaking Part 1, Stock Preparation and Wet End, Fapet Oy, Helsinki, 2000, Chap. 4.
4. Kerekes, R.J., TAPPI J. 66(1): 88(1983).
5. Anderson, D. and Schuster, L., TAPPI J. 21(5): 259(2022). https://doi.org/10.32964/TJ21.5.259.10.32964/TJ21.5.259 ↗
6. Anderson, D.E., U.S. pat. 10,794,003 B2 (Oct. 6, 2020).
7. Anderson, D.E., U.S. pat. 11,001,968 B2 (May 11, 2021).
8. Anderson, D.E., U.S. pat. 11,421,382 B2 (Aug. 23, 2022).
9. Anderson, D.E., U.S. pat. 11,905,658 B2 (Feb. 20, 2024).
10. Anderson, D.E., U.S. pat. 11,965,290 B2 (Apr. 23, 2024).
11. Debnath, M., “Mechanical modifications of recycled fibers using a high-shear homogenizer for sustainable hygiene and packaging solutions,” M.S. thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA, 2021.
12. Debnath, M., Salem, K.S., Naithani, V., et al., Cellulose 28:7981(2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04024-0.10.1007/s10570-021-04024-0 ↗
13. Krainer, C., “Don’t let rejects take away your precious fibers,” Webinar, IPPTA, Saharanpur, U.P., India, 2021. Available [Online] https://ippta.co/wpcontent/uploads/2021/08/Webinar-with-IBS-290521-Final-Proceedings.pdf <26Mar2025>.
14. Anderson, D., Schuster, L., and Haymon, B., “Meet defloccers: Improving refining efficiency with defloccing refiner plates using various fiber blends,” TAPPICon, TAPPI PRESS, Peachtree Corners, GA, USA, 2023.
15. Cai, H., Yuan, Z., Tong, G., et al., BioResources 15(1): 347(2020). https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.15.1.347-359.10.15376/biores.15.1.347-359 ↗