Effect of xylan on the mechanical performance of softwood kraft pulp 2D papers and 3D foams
Source abstract
Abstract
Pulp fibers are paramount in paper products and have lately seen emerging use in fiber foams. Xylan, an integral component in pulp fibers, is known to contribute to paper strength, but its effect on the strength of pulp fiber foams remains less explored. In this study, we investigate the role of xylan in both 2D handsheets and 3D foams. For a softwood kraft pulp, we enzymatically removed 1% from pulp fibers and added 3% xylan to them by adsorption, corresponding to approximately a decrease of a tenth and an increase of a third of the total xylan content. The mechanical properties of 2D fiber networks, i.e., handsheets, made using the xylan-enriched pulp improved, particularly regarding tensile strength and Young’s modulus; however, the decrease in mechanical properties of handsheets made from enzymatically- treated xylan-depleted pulp was more pronounced. In 3D networks • pulp fiber foams, much less fiber-fiber contacts formed, and thus the mechanical properties were not as much influenced by removal of xylan. Furthermore, the presence of the required surfactant on the fibers, acting as debonding agent, overshadows any positive effect xylan might have on fiber-fiber bonding. We propose that the improved mechanical properties for the sheets result from a combination of an increased number of fiber-fiber bonds and higher sheet density, while the deterioration in mechanical properties of handsheets comprising enzymatically-treated fibers is caused by the opposite effect.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Lignin and Wood Chemistry · Material Properties and Processing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Danielsson, S. and Lindström, M.E., Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 20(4):436(2005).https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2005-20-04-p436-441.10.3183/npprj-2005-20-04-p436-441 ↗
2. Roberts, J.C., McCarthy, A.J., Flynn, N.J., et al., Enzyme Microb. Technol. 12(3): 210(1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0229(90)90040-W.10.1016/0141-0229(90)90040-W ↗
3. Schönberg, C., Oksanen, T., Suurnäkki, A., et al., Holzforschung 55(6):639(2001). https://doi.org/10.1515/HF.2001.104.10.1515/HF.2001.104 ↗
4. Miletzky, A., Fischer, W.J., Czibula, C., et al., Cellulose 22:849(2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0532-8.10.1007/s10570-014-0532-8 ↗
5. Pettersson, S.E. and Rydholm, S.A., Sven. Papperstidn. 64(Part 3):4(1961).
6. Laine, J., Hynynen, R., and Stenius, P., “The effect of surface chemical composition and charge on the fiber and paper properties of unbleached and bleached kraft pulps,” in The Fundamentals of Papermaking Materials, Trans. of the XIth Fund. Res. Symp. Cambridge, 1997 (C.F. Baker, Ed.), FRC, Manchester, 2018, pp. 859–892. https://doi.org/10.15376/frc.1997.2.859.10.15376/frc.1997.2.859 ↗
7. Brandberg, A. and Kulachenko, A., Cellulose 27: 6065(2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03153-2.10.1007/s10570-020-03153-2 ↗
8. Perkins, J. and McEvoy, R.P., Tappi 64(2): 99(1981).10.1001/archopht.1981.03930020067002 ↗
9. Ketoja, J.A., Paunonen, S., Jetsu, P., et al., Materials 12(3):384(2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12030384.10.3390/ma12030384 ↗
10. Pöhler, T., Ketoja, J.A., Lappalainen, T., et al., Cellulose 27:6961(2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03263-x.10.1007/s10570-020-03263-x ↗
11. Palasingh, C., Nakayama, K., Abik, F., et al., Carbohydr. Polym. 292:119660(2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119660.10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119660 ↗
12. Schaubeder, J.B., Spirk, S., Fliri, L., et al., Carbohydr. Polym. 323:121371(2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121371.10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121371 ↗
13. Theander, O. and Westerlund, E.A., J. Agric. Food Chem. 34(2):330(1986). https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00068a045.10.1021/jf00068a045 ↗
14. Wojtasz-Mucha, J., Hasani, M., and Theliander, H., Bioresour. Technol. 241: 120(2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.061.10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.061 ↗
15. Dorris, G.M. and Gray, D.G., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 77(2): 353(1982). https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(80)90304-5.10.1016/0021-9797(80)90304-5 ↗
16. Zafeiropoulos, N.E., Vickers, P.E., Baillie, C.A., et al., J. Mater. Sci. 38: 3903(2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026133826672.10.1023/A:1026133826672 ↗
17. Williams, T., Hosur, M., Theodore, M., et al., Int. J. Polym. Sci.1(2011). https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/192865.10.1155/2011/192865 ↗
18. Nypelö, T., Asaadi, S., Kneidinger, G., et al., Cellulose 25:5297(2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1902-4.10.1007/s10570-018-1902-4 ↗
19. Baltazar-y-Jimenez, A. and Bismarck, A., Cellulose 14: 115(2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-006-9092-x.10.1007/s10570-006-9092-x ↗
20. Wagner, M., Biegler, V., Wurm, S., et al., Composites, Part A 188:108515(2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108515.10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108515 ↗
21. Lappalainen, T., Salminen, K., Kinnunen, K., et al., Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 29(4): 689(2014). https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2014-29-04-p689-699.10.3183/npprj-2014-29-04-p689-699 ↗
22. Pääkkönen, T., Dimic-Misic, K., Orelma, H., et al., Cellulose 23:277(2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0824-7.10.1007/s10570-015-0824-7 ↗
23. Salmén, L. and Olsson, A.-M., Wood Sci. Technol. 50: 81(2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-015-0777-x.10.1007/s00226-015-0777-x ↗