Effects of different parameters on the morphology of electrospun cellulose acetate/polyaniline nanocomposite
Source abstract
Abstract
Cellulose is the most abundant naturally occurring polysaccharide. Its inherent mechanical stability, biocompatibility, biodegradability, and abundant hydroxyl groups available for derivatization provide benefits in the production of fiber-based materials such as conductive fibers. Cellulose derivatives, including cellulose esters such as cellulose acetate (CA), are readily generated in the fiber form following dissolution using a variety of solvents. Electrospinning is one of the emerging technologies with an outstanding ability to regenerate fibers in the nanoscale range. Polyaniline (PANI) is a conductive polymer that is popular for its high chemical stability, nontoxicity, good processability, and stable intrinsic redox state. This study explored the fabrication of a conductive PANI/CA nanocomposite through electrospinning. Working conditions, electrospinning variables, and solution parameters were established to produce coherent PANI/CA nanofibers. The effects of varying CA concentration, amount of PANI, molecular weight of CA, and feed flowrate on the morphology of the nanofibers were investigated.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Conducting polymers and applications · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Montelisciani, G., Mazzel, D., and Fantoni, G., Procedia CIRP 21: 93(2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.02.058.10.1016/j.procir.2014.02.058 ↗
2. Kinkeldei, T., Zysset, C., Munzenriedet, N., et al., Sens. Actuators, B 174: 81(2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2012.08.023.10.1016/j.snb.2012.08.023 ↗
3. Takamatsu, S., Kobayashi, T., Shibayama, N., et al., Sens. Actuators, A 184: 57(2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2012.06.031.10.1016/j.sna.2012.06.031 ↗
4. Kohler, A.R., Mater. Des. 51: 51(2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.012.10.5860/CHOICE.51-1016 ↗
5. Bashir, T., “Conjugated polymer-based conductive fibers for smart textile applications,” Ph.D. dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenberg, Sweden, 2015.
6. Cramariuc, B., Cramariuc, R., Scarlet, R., et al., J. Electrost. 71(3): 189(2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elstat.2012.12.018.10.1016/j.elstat.2012.12.018 ↗
7. Quek, S.Y., Hadi, J., and Tanambell, H., “Application of electrospin-ning as bioactive delivery system,” in Encyclopedia of Food Chemistry (L. Melton, F. Shahidi, and P. Varelis, Eds.), Elsevier eBooks, 2019,p. 145-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.22464-5.10.1016/b978-0-08-100596-5.22464-5 ↗
8. Pehkonen, S.O. and Yuan S., Interface Sci. Technol 23: 23(2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813584-6.00003-X.10.1016/B978-0-12-813584-6.00003-X ↗
9. Jabur, A.R., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 43(1): 530(2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.04.005.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.04.005 ↗
10. Kraszkiewicz, A., Kachel-Jakubowska, M., Lorencowicz, E., et al., Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 7: 125(2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.12.005.10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.12.005 ↗
11. Wsoo, M.A., Shahir, S., Bohari, S.P.M., et al., Carbohydr. Res. 491: 107978(2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2020.107978.10.1016/j.carres.2020.107978 ↗
12. Angel, N., Guo, L., Yan, F., et al., J. Agric. Food Res. 2: 100015(2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2019.100015.10.1016/j.jafr.2019.100015 ↗
13. Choi, S., Han, S.I., Kim, D., et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 48(6): 1566(2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cs00706c.10.1039/C8CS00706C ↗
14. Zare, E.N., Makvandi, P., Ashtari, B., et al., J. Med. Chem. 63(1): 1(2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00803.10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00803 ↗
15. Park, J.Y., Lee, I.H., and Bea, G.N., J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 14: 707(2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2008.03.006.10.1016/j.jiec.2008.03.006 ↗
16. Huang, Z.M., Zhang, Y.Z., Kotaki, M., et al., Comp. Sci. Technol. 63: 2223(2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S02663538(03)00178-7.10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00178-7 ↗
17. Drew, C., Wang, X., Samuelson, L.A., et al., J. Macromol. Sci., Part A: Pure Appl. Chem. 40(12):1415(2006).https://doi.org/10.1081/MA-120025320.10.1081/MA-120025320 ↗