Utilization of Areca leaf residues for sustainable production of greyboard
Source abstract
Abstract
This study primarily focused on the production of greyboard using waste materials from small scale industries, and specifically using Areca leaf waste fibers as a sustainable and environmentally friendly resource. Areca leaf waste fibers were employed as the primary raw material for greyboard manufacturing. The resulting greyboard exhibited commendable properties, including a tear index of 7.53 mN·m2/g, tensile index of 18.34·N·m/g (i.e., breaking length of 1870 m), burst factor of 9.24 (gf/cm2)/(g/m2) and stiffness factor of 33.1. This greyboard was created through a series of steps, including hydrothermal treatment of the material at 155°C and mechanical pulping refinement. The produced greyboard met the specifications outlined in the Indian Standard 2617 (1967) for greyboard. The key objective of this work was to leverage agricultural waste resources to develop a chemical-free greyboard, resulting in reduced waste disposal in open fields and a decrease in chemical usage within the greyboard manufacturing industry. Various characterization techniques, including field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), attenuated total reflection•Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) analysis, and X-ray diffraction (XRD), were used to assess the fiber quality, including aspects such as functional groups, morphology, and crystallinity for the materials used in the manufacturing process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polysaccharides Composition and Applications · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Tree Root and Stability Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Jaishwal, K., Alam, I., and Sharma, C., TAPPI J. 21(9): 469(2022). https://doi.org/10.32964/tj21.9.469.10.32964/TJ21.9.469 ↗
2. Patil, K.K.R., Chinnappa, B., Manjunatha, G.R., et al., Indian J. Ecol. 46(2): 431(2019). https://indianecologicalsociety.com/wp-content/themes/ecology/volume_pdfs/Abstract-35.pdf.
3. Arifuzzaman Khan, G.M., Shahrear Palash, S.R., Shamsul Alam, M., et al., Polym. Compos. 33(5): 764(2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.22204.10.1002/pc.22204 ↗
4. Poddar, P., Asadulah Asad, M., Saiful Islam, M., et al., Adv. Mater. Sci. 1(2): 1(2016). https://doi.org/10.15761/ams.1000113.10.15761/AMS.1000112 ↗
5. Jayamani, E., Hamdan, S., Rahman, M.R., et al., Procedia Eng. 97: 545(2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.282.10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.282 ↗
6. Raghupathy, R., Viswanathan, R., and Devadas, C., Bioresour. Technol. 82(1): 99(2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00141-9.10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00141-9 ↗
7. Poddar, P., Sultana, S., Akbar, A., et al., MOJ Poly. Sci. 2(2): 48(2018). https://medcraveonline.com/MOJPS/MOJPS-02-00046.pdf.
8. Padmaraj, N.H., Kini, M.V., Pai, B.R., et al., Procedia Eng. 64:966(2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.173.10.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.173 ↗
9. Fan, Q., Han, G., Cheng, W., et al., Polymers (Basel, Switz.) 10: 896(2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10080896.10.3390/polym10080896 ↗
10. Saini, S., Kadam, A.A., Kumar, V., et al., Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 13: 6797(2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01728-y.10.1007/s13399-021-01728-y ↗
11. Oktaviananda, C., Rahmawati, R.F., Prasetya, A., et al., AIP Conf. Proc. 1823(1): 020029(2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4978102.10.1063/1.4978102 ↗
12. Bhuiyan, M.T.R., Hirai, N., and Sobue, N., J. Wood Sci. 46:431(2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00765800.10.1007/BF00765800 ↗
13. Das, P.P., Chaudhary, V., Ahmad, F., et al., Polym. Compos. 43(3): 1221(2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.26455.10.1002/pc.26455 ↗
14. Saad, M.J., and Ibrahim, R., J. Trop. Agric. Food Sci. 44(1): 103(2016). http://jtafs.mardi.gov.my/jtafs/44-1/mechanical.pdf.
15. Poletto, M., Zattera, A.J., Forte, M.M.C., et al., Bioresour. Technol. 109: 148(2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.122.10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.122 ↗
16. Popescu, C.M., Popescu, M.C., and Vasile, C., Carbohydr. Polym. 79(2): 362(2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.08.015.10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.08.015 ↗
17. da Silva Morais, A.P., Sansígolo, C.A., and de Oliveira Neto, M., Bioresour. Technol. 214: 623 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.124.10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.124 ↗
18. Marchessault, R.H. and Liang, C.Y., J. Polym. Sci. 59(168): 357(1962). https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1962.1205916813.10.1002/pol.1962.1205916813 ↗
19. Bhuiyan, M.T.R., Hirai, N., and Sobue, N., J. Wood Sci. 47:336(2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00766782.10.1007/BF00766782 ↗
20. Kiemle, S.N., Zhang, X., Esker, A.R., Biomacromolecules 15(5): 1727(2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/bm5001247.10.1021/bm5001247 ↗
21. Mousa, N., Galiwango, E., Haris, S., et al., Polymers (Basel, Switz.). 14: 574(2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14030574.10.3390/polym14030574 ↗