Factors affecting phosphorus uptake/dissolution during slaking and causticizing
Source abstract
Abstract
Hydroxide is regenerated in the recovery cycle of kraft pulp mills by the addition of lime (CaO) to green liquor. Phosphate in green liquor can react with the lime during slaking/causticizing. Total titratable alkali (TTA), sulfidity, the concentration of phosphate in the green liquor, temperature, and the liming ratio were all vari-ables explored in this work to determine their influence on phosphorus uptake and dissolution. Experiments were also run in which the lime was slaked before being added to the green liquor to separate reactions with phosphate during slaking and reactions that occur during causticizing. Both reburnt lime and technical grade CaO were used. The experiment results indicate that phosphorus primarily reacts with slaked lime (Ca(OH)2), and that the final con-centration of phosphate in the white liquor at the end of slaking and causticizing is nearly independent of the initial concentration of phosphorus and only mildly dependent on the carbonate concentration in the green liquor. There do appear to be differences in the rate at which phosphate reacts with reburnt lime and technical grade CaO, though the reason for this was not determined.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Phosphorus and nutrient management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. Magnusson, H., Mork, K., and Warnqvist, B., “Non-process chemi-cal elements in the kraft recovery system,” TAPPI ATCP Pulping Conf., TAPPI Press, Atlanta, 1979.
2. Mousavi, M. and DeMartini, N., TAPPI J. 19(3): 139(2020). https://doi.org/10.32964/TJ19.3.139.10.32964/TJ19.3.139 ↗
3. Fossum, T., Hartler, N., and Lihert, J., Sven. Papperstidn. 75(8): 305(1972).
4. Jonsson, B., Pernestal, K., and Li, H.-K., “Analysis of the content of trace elements in tree cores from spruce by means of pixe,” Report 20, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, 1989.
5. Werkelin, J., Skrifvars, B.-J., Zevenhoven, M., et al., Fuel 89(2): 48(2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2009.09.005.10.1016/j.fuel.2009.09.005 ↗
6. Asemaninejada, A., Arteagaa, J., Spiersa, G., et al., J. Environ. Manage. 228: 93(2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.114.10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.114 ↗
7. Hyvonen, A., “The effect of non-process elements in biosludge on the recovery cycles in kraft pulp mills,” MASc thesis, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland, 2015.
8. Bialik, M., Jensen, A., and Ahlroth, M., TAPPI J. 14(7): 421(2015). https://doi.org/10.32964/TJ14.7.421.10.32964/TJ14.7.421 ↗
9. Ulmgren, P. and Rådeström, R., J. Pulp Pap. Sci. 23(2): J52(1997).
10. McGuffie, B. and Taylor, K., Pulp Pap. Can. 108(3): 34(2007).10.1017/S0317167100005898 ↗
11. Karlemo, C., “Non-process elements in the recovery cycle of six Finish kraft pulp mills,” Master’s thesis, Åbo Academi University, Turku, Finland, 2019.10.32964/tj22.3.184 ↗
12. Taylor, K. and McGuffie, B., Pulp Pap. Can. 108(2): 27(2007).
13. Ulmgren, P. and Rådeström, R., Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 12(3): 167(1997). https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-1997-12-03-p167-174.10.3183/npprj-1997-12-03-p167-174 ↗