journal article·2024-01-01

Improving monochloramine performance with innovative sensor-controlled dosing

RYAN EBERHARDT, JANET H. WOODWARD

TAPPI Journal· Volume 23· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Monochloramine (MCA) has become one of the major oxidant chemistries for biological control in the paper industry. Feedback control, such as oxidative-reductive potential (ORP), is often used to provide better control of a dosing scheme. The trademarked Ackumen MCA-i is a chemical-digital solution that uses artificial intelligence with actionable insights to stabilize the wet-end process, providing improved performance and reduction in overall chemical costs. Accurate sensor-controlled dosing can be tied to multiple inputs, such as production rates, grade changes, pH, ORP, chlorine residual, freshwater usage, and more. In this study, a case history will be presented to demonstrate how this technology provided a more consistent MCA molecule throughout the process, resulting in a higher level of efficacy and reduction in chemical costs. Application: Through advanced multiparameter dosing controls, monochloramine feed rates can be adjusted as the paper machine process changes. This leads to the right amount of chemistry being applied at the right time, maximizing efficiency of the biocide program.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Biosensors and Analytical Detection · Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications · Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Henderson, C.T., U.S. pat. 1,940,592 (Dec. 19, 1933).10.5694/j.1326-5377.1933.tb15112.x ↗
2. Shera, B.L., Pap. Trade J. 92(20): 272(1931).10.2307/803075 ↗
3. Baldwin, R.T., Pap. Trade J. 96(25): 313(1933).10.1524/teme.1933.2536.jg.313 ↗
4. Griffin, A.E., Pap. Trade J. 103(17): 263(1936).10.1029/TR017i001p00103-2 ↗
5. Trautschold, R., Chem. Ind. 39: 27(1936). https://doi.org/10.1246/nikkashi1898.39.27.10.1246/nikkashi1898.39.27 ↗
6. Keene, P.A., Pap. Trade J. 109(11): 140(1939).10.1108/eb030463 ↗
7. Lee, J., Pap. Trade J. 104(17): 237(1937).10.1093/ptj/17.3.104 ↗
8. Grant, N.S., Pulp Pap. Mag. Can. 43: 89(1942).10.1049/ji-1.1942.0089 ↗
9. Rampel, L.J., Pap. Trade J. 121(22): 209(1945).10.1021/ed022p209 ↗
10. King, G., Pac. Pulp Pap. Ind. 18(6): 39(1944).10.2307/3716454 ↗
11. Sanborn, J.R., Pap. Trade J. 119(25): 243(1944).10.1016/S0140-6736(00)42626-7 ↗
12. Griffin, A.E., J. AWWA 31(12): 2121(1939).10.1002/j.1551-8833.1939.tb13148.x ↗
13. Martin, R.B., Pap. Trade J. 116(18): 203(1943).10.7326/0003-4819-18-1-116 ↗
14. Suydam, G.M. and McConky, R.R., Pap. Trade J. 118(8): 67(1944).
15. Appling, J.W. and Shema, B.F., Pap. Mill News 65(35): 14(1942).
16. Appling, J.W., and McCoy, J.F., Pap. Trade J. 119(112): 67(1944).
17. Appling, J.W., and McCoy, J.F., Pap. Trade J. 121(13): 21(1945).
18. Appling, J.W. and McCoy, J.F., Pap. Trade J. 121(19): 181(1945).
19. Appling, J.W., McCoy, J.F., and Shema, B.F., Pap. Trade J. 124(22): 239(1947).
20. Sanborn, J.R., Slime Control in the Pulp and Paper Industry, Lockwood Trade Journal Co., New York, 1965.
21. Appling, J.R., Cruickshank, G.A., DeLong, R.F., et al., Eds., “Microbiology of paper and pulp,” Monograph No. 15, TAPPI, New York, 1955.
22. White, G.W., Handbook of Chlorination and Alternative Disinfectants, 4th edn., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1999, pp. 227-279.
23. Jacangelo, J.G. and Oliveri, V.P., Water Chlorination: Chemistry, Environmental Impact and Health Effects, Vol. 5, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI, USA, 1985, p. 575.
24. LeChevallier, M.W., Cawthon, C.D., and Lee, R.G., Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54(3): 649(1988). https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.54.3.649-654.1988.10.1128/aem.54.3.649-654.1988 ↗
25. Höötmann, U., Wochenbl. Papierfabr. 128: 293(2000).10.1016/S0011-9164(00)00044-8 ↗