Multilayering of conventional latex-based dispersion coatings containing small amounts of silica nanospheres: Runnability on a pilot scale flexographic coater and barrier performance
Source abstract
Abstract
The addition of functional coatings to packaging materials is a key requirement for increasing their performance and creating innovative packaging solutions. Flexography, a cost-effective printing method commonly used to print information and graphics directly onto a wide variety of packaging substrates, shows good potential for applying functional coatings. In this study, conventional clay-latex coating formulations containing approximately 1.3 wt% silica nanospheres were applied to a linerboard using a pilot scale flexographic printing web press. The performance of multilayered silica nanosphere-based coatings was compared with conventional coatings containing talc and/or wax dispersion in terms of coating grammage, runnability, and barrier performance. Coating grammage increased with an increased number of coating layers and a significant decrease in both the water vapor transmission rate (WVTR) and the direct water uptake of water (Cobb 120 wettability test) was observed for coatings containing silica nanoparticles. In general, the silica nanosphere-based coatings performed better than talc-based coatings. Talc/wax-based coatings had the highest variation in surface roughness due to an uneven distribution and variations of coating layers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Properties and Processing · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Page, A., “The future of the packaging; Long-term scenarios to 2020,” Smithers-Pira, Leatherhead, U.K., 2009, p. 192.
2. Lehtinen, E. (Ed.), Paulapuro, H., and Gullichsen, J., Papermaking Science and Technology. Book 11, Pigment Coating and Surface Sizing of Paper, Fapet Oy, Helsinki, 2000.
3. Vähä-Nissi, M., Lahti, J., Saivolainen, A., et al., Appita J. 54(2): 106(2001).
4. Andersson, C., Packag. Technol. Sci. 21(6): 823(2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.823.10.1002/pts.823 ↗
5. Schuman, T., Karlsson, A., Larsson, J., et al., Prog. Org. Coat. 54(4): 360(2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2005.06.017.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2005.06.017 ↗
6. Schuman, T., Wikström, M., and Rigdahl, M., Prog. Org. Coat. 51(3): 228(2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2004.07.016.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2004.07.016 ↗
7. Kugge, C. and Johnson, B., Prog. Org. Coat. 62(4): 430(2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2008.03.006.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2008.03.006 ↗
8. Andersson, C., Ernstsson, M., and Järnström, L., Packag. Technol. Sci. 15(4): 209(2002). https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.590.10.1002/pts.590 ↗
9. Gusev, A.A. and Lusti, H.R., Adv. Mater. 13(21): 1641(2001). https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4095(200111)13:21<1641::AID-ADMA1641>3.0.CO;2-P.10.1002/1521-4095(200111)13:21<1641::AID-ADMA1641>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
10. Mesic, B., Kugge, C., and Järnström, L., TAPPI J. 9(11): 33(2010). https://doi.org/10.32964/TJ911.33.10.32964/tj911.33 ↗
11. Rissa, K., Lepistö, T., Vähä-Nissi, M., et al., Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 15(5): 357(2000). https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2000-15-05-p357-361.10.3183/npprj-2000-15-05-p357-361 ↗
12. Vähä-Nissi, M., Savolainen, A., Talja, M., et al., TAPPI J. 82(1): 253(1999).
13. Mesic, B., Järnström, L., and Johnston, J., Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 3(2): 350(2015). https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2015-30-02-p350-360.10.3183/npprj-2015-30-02-p350-360 ↗
14. Mesic, B., Cairns, M., Järnström, L., et al., Prog. Org. Coat. 129: 43(2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2018.12.025.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2018.12.025 ↗
15. Stöber, W., Fink, A., and Bohn, E., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 26(1):62(1968). https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(68)90272-5.10.1016/0021-9797(68)90272-5 ↗
16. Findening, G., Leimgruber, S., Kargl, R., et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 4(6): 3199(2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/am300542h.10.1021/am300542h ↗
17. Cairns, M.J., Mesic, B., Johnston, J.H., et al., Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 34(3): 334(2018). https://doi.org/10.1515/npprj-2018-0066.10.1515/npprj-2018-0066 ↗
18. Bourke, P., “Image filtering in frequency domain,” paulbourke.net, June 1998. Available [Online] http://paulbourke.net/miscellaneous/imagefilter/ <31Oct2023>.
19. Wieland, M., Hänggi, P., Hotz, W., et al., Wear 237(2): 231(2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(99)00347-6.10.1016/S0043-1648(99)00347-6 ↗