journal article·2022-08-01

Calender barring review with experiences

JAKE ZWART

TAPPI Journal· Volume 21· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Excessive calender vibration affects all styles of calender stacks from single to multi-nip, all hard rolls, or a combination of hard and soft rolls. Calender vibration can be forced vibration or self-excited vibration. Forced vibration occurs at the first few harmonics of the calender roll rotational speeds and is caused by imbalance, misalignment, eccentricity, etc. Self-excited vibration, the focus of this paper, occurs at higher frequencies. Feedback paths for self-excited vibration must be understood in order to ameliorate the problem. This is presented in the context of the historical development of the theory of self-excited feedback mechanisms, followed by a survey of self-excited feedback mechanisms in various types of calender stacks. Methodology to determine which feedback path is present and techniques to control or eliminate the resulting vibration follow. To obtain a flavor of the types of problems faced and practical remedial actions, a variety of experiences with barring issues are provided.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties · Granular flow and fluidized beds

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Brown, D.L., “Grinding dynamics,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 1976.
2. Comak, A., “Mechanics, dynamics and stability of turn-milling oper-ations”, Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 2018.
3. Anon., “Delay differential equation,” Wikipedia page, Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Available [Online] https://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Delay_differential_equation <14July2022>.
4. Bercel, E., Tappi 62(11): 93(197).
5. Wahlstrom, P.B., Larsson, K.O., and Asklof, C.A., “Calender barring, its mechanism and possible elimination,” Pulp Pap. Mag. Can. 64(4): T205(1963).
6. Pye, I.T., Pulp Pap. Mag. Can. 64(4): T194(1963).
7. Howe, B.I. and Cosgrove, J.C., Pulp Pap. Mag. Can. 64(6): T259(1963).
8. Davidson, R.W., “A study of calender barring through analog simu-lation,” MASc thesis, University of Maine, Orono, 1966.
9. Parker, J.R. and Epton, J.B.A., Pulp Pap. Can. 76(10): T308(1975).
10. Cotgrove, L.B., “Calender barring – causes and cures,” Pulp and Paper Mill Equipment, February 1988.
11. Browne, T.C., “Viscoelastic properties of paper in a calender nip,” Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, August, 1994.
12. Shelley, S., Zwart, J., and Fournier, A., “New insights into calender barring prevention,” Annu. Meet. - Can. Pulp Pap. Assoc., Tech. Sect., 83rd, CPPA, Montreal, 1997.
13. Melnick, R.M., Zwart, J., Zu, J.W., et al., “Comprehensive model-ling of a calender stack for prediction of offsets,” Annu. Meet. - Can. Pulp Pap. Assoc., Tech. Sect., 83rd, CPPA, Montreal, 1997.
14. Chinn, F., Pulp Paper Can. 100(1): 11(1999).
15. Karttunen, A.T and von Hertzen, R., J. Sound Vib. 330(16):3959(2011).10.1016/j.jsv.2011.03.016 ↗
16. Zaoralek, M., “Improved high temperature calender roll,” Prepr. Pap., Annu. Meet. - Can. Pulp Pap. Assoc., Tech. Sect., 1991, Preprints B, p. 107.
17. Anon., “Tapio PMA & TS Profiler,” Tapio Technologies, Espoo, Finland. Available [Online] https://tapiotechnologies.com/tapio_ pma_ts_profiler/ <14July2022>.
18. Kiviluoma, P., “Method and device for in situ runout measurement of calender thermo rolls,” Ph.D. dissertation, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, 2009.
19. Schwarz, B., Richardson, S., Tyler, J., et al., “Post-processing ODS data from a vibration video,” IMAC XXXVIII, Society for Experimental Mechanics, Bethel, CT, USA, 2020.
20. Hay, J., “Motion amplification: A new way to visualize and mea-sure dynamic systems and structures utilizing video cameras,” IMAC XXXVIII, Society for Experimental Mechanics, Bethel, CT, USA, 2020.
21. Parker, J.R., Pap. Technol. 6(1): T1(1965).
22. Cotgrove, L.B., “The B.T.S. electronic curvature gauge,” personal communication, 28 November 1989.
23. Parent, F. and Hamel, J., “Calender residual barring correction dur-ing roll grinding,” TAPPI PaperCon, TAPPI Press, Atlanta, 2010.
24. Crotogino, R.H., Hussain, S.M., and McDonald, J.D., J. Pulp Pap. Sci. 9(11): TR128(1983).
25. Anon., “Industrial damper systems,” Xcite Systems, Cincinnati. Available [Online] https://xcitesystems.com/industrialdampersys-tems-2/ <14July2022>.
26. Cameron, D., Voith Appleton, personal communication, 15 July 2022.
27. Anon., “Voith winder upgrades,” Voith, Heidenheim, Germany. Available [Online] https://voith.com/corp-en/papermaking/winder-upgrades.html <14July2022>.
28. Anon., “Integral squeeze film damper,” Waukesha Bearings, Waukeshaw, WI, USA. Available [Online] https://www.waukbear-ing.com/en/products/fluid-film-bearings/integral-squeeze-film-damper.html <14July2022>.10.1016/s0301-679x(97)00041-8 ↗
29. Morgan, B. and Charron, J., “Irving Paper PM1 speed increase,” Annu. Meet. - Pulp Pap. Tech. Assoc. Can., 103rd, PAPTAC, Montreal, 2017.